1. How many aspects should a good interview process include?
A.2. | B.3. | C.4. |
A.A manager. | B.A reporter. | C.A writer. |
A.Some interviewees are too casual. |
B.Some interviewers are not professional. |
C.Some interviewees only focus on building a good relationship. |
2 . One side effect of globalization and the related phenomenon of greatly increased mobility (流动性) is that the traditional definition of “foreigner” has passed its “best-before date”.
Is a European who has lived in China longer than in his home country, becoming fluent in the language and knowing the culture well in the process, still a foreigner in China, or has he become more of a foreigner in his own hometown? What about a Beijinger who had her schooling in Canada and then lived and worked there for another 20 years while raising a family who has no intention of returning to China? Does she think and act like a foreigner? What do we mean by this label (标签)?
When I grew up in the suburbs of Chicago, the faces I would see during a walk through a local shopping mall back in the 1960s and 1970s included almost none of Asian descent (血统). Today the local malls are full of Asian faces, and a glance at the ranks of top-scoring students in local schools reveals lots of Asian surnames.
To some extent, this is no great surprise in the American context, because America is a land of immigrants, and a cultural melting pot. Apart from the native American Indians, Americans are (or were), in some way, all foreigners anyway. Absorbing a large number of immigrants is an established pattern in American history.
In most places, the traditional foreigners were people who didn’t speak or read the local languages well and were unfamiliar with local customs and lifestyles. But, nowadays, a foreigner walking down the street may have better SAT scores than you, or a higher degree from a better university.
The traditional role models are getting mixed up, and it looks like this is just the beginning of a new chapter. Today, the whole thing has totally changed. It’s not about where people are from or what color their skins are. It’s about who they are, what values and skills they bring, and how they think.
1. What can we learn from the first paragraph?A.The term “foreigner” should be redefined. |
B.The term “foreigner” should no longer be used. |
C.There are no more foreigners in the world today. |
D.The term “foreigner” is not proper to define people. |
A.It’s no longer proper to define foreigners according to their birthplaces. |
B.The label of foreigners can never be removed. |
C.Most foreigners can do well in learning languages. |
D.It’s impossible for a foreigner to get recognition abroad. |
A.In 1960s and 1970s, Asians didn’t shop in Chicago. |
B.Today, more and more Asian travellers like to shop in Chicago. |
C.There are more Asian people today than in the 1960s and 1970s in Chicago. |
D.Most Asian students do well academically in the schools in Chicago. |
A.Confused | B.Disappointed | C.Unconcerned | D.Positive |
3 . There are reasonable dependencies that are healthy for an individual’s development. However, other dependencies bring unhappiness.
Depending on other people’s opinions means letting your behavior, likes and desires be determined by the approval of those that surround you.
Few are able to tell apart their own tastes and style from the current fashion trends. Now, we’re not only talking about clothing or accessories here but about general preferences and even philosophies. That desire to hop on a train and be part of the majority sometimes leads to dependency. Some become truly concerned about not being “in style”.
When the individual begins associating their personal value with the amount of money they have, it becomes a problem. Relying on money sometimes means believing that happiness equals consumption.
A.It is associated with a deep dependency. |
B.Having money is vital to everyone’s life. |
C.These don’t contribute to your well-being. |
D.Therefore, their own sense of identity is lost. |
E.Some people take this too seriously to the point of addiction. |
F.Supposing that your value depends on your wealth is the key to unhappiness. |
G.You don’t really focus on believing yourself but getting acceptance from others. |
4 . Twelve-year-old Catherine has a lot of friends—632, actually, if you count up her online friends. And she spends a lot of time with them.
But is it possible that Catherine’s online friendships could be making her lonely? That’s what some experts believe. Connecting online is a great way to stay in touch, they say. However, some experts worry that many kids are so busy connecting online that they might be missing out on true friendships.
Could this be true? During your parents’ childhoods, connecting with friends usually meant spending time with them in the flesh. Kids played Scrabble around a table, not words with friends on their phones. When friends missed each other, they picked up the telephone. Friends might even write letters to each other.
Today, most communication takes place online. A typical teen sends 2,000 texts a month and spends more than 44 hours per week in front of a screen. Much of this time is spent on social media platform.
In fact, in many ways, online communication can make friendships stronger. “There’s definitely a positive influence. Kids can stay in constant contact, which means they can share more of their feelings with each other,” says Katie Davis, co-author of The App Generation.
Other experts, however, warn that too much online communication can get in the way of forming deep friendships. “If we are constantly checking in with our virtual world, we will have little time for our real-world friendships,” says Larry Rosen, a professor at California State University. Rosen also worries that today’s kids might mistake the “friends” on the social media for true friends in life. However, in tough times, you don’t need anyone to like your picture or share your blogs. You need someone who will keep your secrets and hold your hand. You would like to talk face to face.
1. What is the purpose of the first paragraph?A.To tell about true friends. | B.To start a discussion. |
C.To encourage online friendships. | D.To summarize(总结) the text. |
A.In any case. | B.In public. | C.In person. | D.In advance. |
A.Unconcerned. | B.Positive. | C.Worried. | D.Confused. |
A.Teenagers need to focus on real-world friendships. | B.It’s easier to develop friendships in real life. |
C.It’s wise to turn to friends online. | D.Social media help people stay closely connected. |
5 . If a traditional sport bores you, it’s time to try something new! Cycling, but outdoors on city roads; surfing, but on the land; playing frisbee (飞盘), but with a group of people... New sports have been refreshing our minds, bringing more joy to physical exercise.
National fitness has been part of the national strategy for many years, aiming to improve people’s overall physical health. With great attention paid in support of national fitness, new sports begin to develop. According to a study by Houlang Research Institute which attracted more than 1,200 young people to participate, more than 93 percent of people born after 2000are interested in urban (城市的) sports.
Why do young people favor new sports? Houlang’s report claims that apart from keeping fit as a type of exercise, many young people pick them up to socialize—allowing them to build up their social circles. “Players tend to have online group chats announcing their usual activities and simply sharing their lives. The new sports are also suitable for taking photos and are less limited by venues (场地),” the CEO of a tourism website in China told China News Service. Gathered together through social media, people can enjoy new sports at many places in the city, from parks to spacious sidewalks.
Qianjiang Evening News also comments that the new sport are easier for new players to start, unlike other traditional sports, such as soccer and basketball, which usually require strict and complex rules. Thus, the new sports are less competitive but could bring more fun. According to a website, people may opt for sports that are less challenging and can take place at local venues.
Urban sports have unlocked new lifestyles in China and prove that more people arc exposed to and willing to enjoy sports, according to China News Service.
1. Why do the young prefer urban sports?A.To help socialize. | B.To compete better. |
C.To have online chats. | D.To desert traditional sports. |
A.They are only suitable for the young. | B.They are easy to have access to. |
C.They are more competitive than traditional sports. | D.They need more strict rules. |
A.Spot. | B.Decide. | C.Support. | D.Choose. |
A.The entertainment activities in modern cities | B.A promising exercise for the young |
C.The rise of urban sports in China | D.The development of urban sports |
According to a recent survey, violence (暴力) did happen in schools. Students showed their fear and parents and teachers were also
The topic of school violence is
If I meet with school violence, I will not answer violence with violence, for it will lead
All in all, we students should be responsible for
7 . You might think people all over the United States have WiFi — wireless Internet service — and mobile phones. But there is no such service in Green Bank, West Virginia, a tiny town four hours from the US capital, Washington D. C. Fewer than 150 people live in Green Bank, which has two churches, an elementary school and a public library. It is also home to the largest radio telescope in the world.
There is a ban (禁令) on WiFi in Green Bank, along with anything else that can create electromagnetic (电磁的) waves. Officials say the waves could disturb the signals (信号) the telescope receives.
For many Americans, a visit to Green Bank is a little like returning to the 1950s. To get there, you must read road signs because there is no GPS service in the town. People can connect with the Internet through telephones, but wireless service is not allowed.
The observatory (天文台) is one of the largest employers in the area. The National Science Foundation (NSF) spends about $8.2 million a year to operate the observatory, telescope and educational center.
Jonah Bauserman is a technician. If he supposes there is a signal that is not allowed in the zone, he drives to the house where the signal is coming from and checks it. But once a week, when the device is cleaned, some banned devices are allowed near it.
People in the town respect the work of the scientists. And they say they are happy to live without WiFi and mobile phones. “You know, instead of sitting here with our phones and other devices we’re out fishing, hunting and going to each other’s houses.” Everyone knows each other and communication is almost always face to face.
1. What will you see when you pay a visit to Green Bank?A.GPS service. | B.Guide posts. | C.Cellphone towers. | D.Radiocontrolled toys. |
A.Following signals from cellphones. | B.Cleaning the telescope once a week. |
C.Listening for signals from outer space. | D.Protecting the telescope from being affected. |
A.Great wealth. | B.Many job chances. |
C.A healthier lifestyle. | D.Much difficulty in life. |
A.An American Town Without WiFi and Mobile Phones |
B.Good Relationships Between People in an American Town |
C.The Largest Radio Telescope in the World |
D.A Better Life Without Wireless Devices |
8 . A new study finds sales of sugary drinks obviously fell across several US cities, after they carried out soda taxes (汽水税) aiming those drinks — and those changes continued over time. Taxes ranged from 1 to 2 cents. For a 2-liter bottle of soda, that comes out to between 67 cents to $1.30 extra in taxes.
“While prior (先前的) studies have looked at the impact of soda taxes, they usually studied one city at a time. This new study looked at the overall effect of the taxes on several cities to get an idea of what might happen if these taxes were more widespread — or enlarged to the state or national level,” says Scott Kaplan, an economics professor and the study’s lead author.
Kaplan and his co-workers found that prices for sugary drinks went up by 33.1% and purchases (购买量) went down by basically the same amount. So when people had to pay more for sugary drinks, they reduced their purchases — the effect was large and continued.
As Kaplan notes, “Sugary drinks make up a quarter of all the added sugar we see in the average adult American diet. And that’s a really big amount.” Jennifer Pomeranz, a professor at the School of Public Health, says, “Taxes that aim sugary drinks are good public health policy because these drinks have no nutritional (营养的) value, but they are linked with diet-related diseases. Too much added sugar is linked to a host of poor health outcomes, including overweight and heart disease.” Last month, WHO called on countries to increase taxes on sugary drinks as a way to promote healthier diets.
Today, the sugary drink industry’s strategy of offering consumers more choices with less sugar is working, and nearly 60% of drinks sold have zero sugar. The calories that people get from drinks have decreased to the lowest level in decades.
1. What’s the difference between the new study and the prior ones?A.The range. | B.The challenge. | C.The expense. | D.The benefit. |
A.They bought them in overseas markets. |
B.They turned to the government for help. |
C.They cut down the drinks’ consumption. |
D.They added sugar to drinks by themselves. |
A.To better protect people’s health. |
B.To encourage research into drinks. |
C.To improve the nutrition of drinks. |
D.To make more money for the government. |
A.It is a short-sighted decision. |
B.It is a success story. |
C.It benefits sugary drinks industry. |
D.It upsets customers. |
9 . In the coming era of budget cuts to education, remote learning could become a common thing.
The appeal to those in charge of education budgets to trade teachers for technology is so strong that they tend to ignore the disadvantages of remote learning. School facilities are expensive to build and maintain, and teachers are expensive to employ. It’s true that online classes do not require buildings and each class can host hundreds of people, which can result in greater savings, but moving away from a traditional classroom in which a living, breathing human being teaches and interacts with students daily would be a disaster.
Physically attending school has hidden benefits: interacting with peers and communicating with teachers are important skills to cultivate(培养)in young people. Moreover, schools are more than simple places of traditional learning. They are also places that provide meals, places where students receive mental help and other support.
Those policy-makers are often fascinated by the latest technology in education and its potential to transform education overnight. But online education does not allow a teacher to keep a struggling student after class and offer help. Educational videos may deliver academic content, but they are unable to make eye contact or assess a student’s level of engagement. Distance education will never match the personal teaching in a traditional classroom. In their first 18 years of life. American children spend only 9% of their time in school. Yet teachers are expected to prepare them to be responsible citizens, cultivate their social skills, encourage successful time management, and improve their capacity to compete in a competitive job market. Given these expectations, schools should not become permanently “remote”.
The power of the classroom is rooted in the qualities of the people gathered in the same place, at the same time, including their nature, empathy, devotion and so on. Technology, no matter how advanced, should simply be a tool of a good teacher.
1. What is one possible benefit of students attending school physically?A.Transforming traditional teaching. |
B.Eating nutritionally-well-balanced-meals. |
C.Growing into living and breathing human beings. |
D.Developing relationships with peers and teachers. |
A.It may reduce face-to-face interaction. |
B.It may make many teachers jobless. |
C.It may add to student’s financial burden. |
D.It may revolutionize classroom teaching. |
A.complexity | B.inequality | C.responsibility | D.capability |
A.It lacks humanity. | B.It can‘t meet personal needs. |
C.It is still not advanced. | D.It can’t track students’ growth. |
10 . Recently it has dawned on the government that closing more than 1,000 of England’s railway station ticket offices would not be very smart politics.The transport secretary, Mark Harper, announced that train operators had been asked to withdraw the cost-cutting strategy, which the government itself had originally pushed on them. The writing was already on the wall in the summer,when public anger led to an extension of the consultation period on the proposed closures. By the time it ended, 750,000 responses had been recorded, 99% of them negative.
The public’s concerns were over future access to travel advice and information, assistance for disabled people, safety at understaffed stations, and consequences for the digitally excluded. But the passionate opposition also underlined a widespread sense that railway stations must be more than transit (交通) zones. Combined with a reformed ticketing system, that insight should now inform a positive approach to breathing life into England’s railways and attracting more people back on to trains.
As a report published this autumn by the Campaign for Better Transport sets out, there is an urgent case for fairer ticketing reform across the network. For over a decade, the relative cost of taking the train rather than the car has skyrocketed, as fares have risen while fuel duty has been frozen. Over a third of the public are confused by the numerous types of ticket available, and the complex regulations that apply to them. Why should an anytime return from Chelmsford to London cost &32.60, when to cover the same distance from Grays to London costs E 13.40?
The failed attempt to shut down ticket offices had its roots in a short-term ministerial response to falling revenues (收入). But as the country strives to achieve a challenging green transition, the government should work to establish a simpler, fairer ticketing system that offers imaginative rewards to take the train; and to develop an ambitious plan for our stations — one that reflects their important role in the lives of the travelling public.
1. What does the underlined words in the first paragraph probably mean?A.The public expressed their anger. |
B.The proposal was put up on a wall. |
C.Unfavorable outcome was expected. |
D.The government adopted the policy. |
A.They have expanded their services. |
B.They have undergone ticketing reform. |
C.They have included more transit zones. |
D.They have seen a decline in public favor. |
A.The popularity of car ownership. |
B.The development of ticketing reform. |
C.The problems of the ticketing system. |
D.The application of complex regulations. |
A.Rising Prices of Train Travel |
B.Urgent Calls for Rail Revival |
C.Failed Closure of Railway Stations |
D.Tough Route to Green Transit Initiatives |