组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科学技术
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:95 题号:12792400

In an economy where data is changing how companies create value — and compete — experts predict that using artificial intelligence (Al) at a larger scale will add as much as $I5.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030. As Al is changing how companies work, many believe that who does this work will change, too — and that organizations will begin to replace human employees with intelligent machines. This is already happening: intelligent systems are displacing humans in manufacturing, service delivery, recruitment, and the financial industry, consequently moving human workers towards lower-paid jobs or making them unemployed. This trend has led some to conclude that in 2040 our workforce may be totally unrecognizable.

Are humans and machine really in competition with each other though? The history of work—particularly since the Industrial Revolution—is the history of people transferring their labor to machines. While that began with rote, repetitive physical tasks like weaving, machines have evolved to the point where they can now do what we might think of as complex cognitive work, such as math equations, recognizing language and speech, and writing. Machines thus seem ready to reproduce the work of our minds, and not just our bodies. In the 21st century, Al is evolving to be superior to humans in many tasks, which makes that we seem ready to transfer our intelligence to technology. With this latest trend, it seems like there's nothing that can't soon be automated, meaning that no job is safe from being offloaded to machines.

This vision of the future of work has taken the shape of a zero-sum game, in which there can only be one winner.

We believe, however, that this view of the role Al will play in the workplace is wrong. The question of whether Al will replace human workers assumes that Al and humans have the same qualities and abilities — but, in reality, they don't. Al — based machines are fast, more accurate, and consistently rational, but they aren't intuitive, emotional, or culturally sensitive. And, it's exactly these abilities that humans possess and which make us effective.

1. How does Al influence human life according to Paragraph 1?
A.It increases huge economic costs.B.It dominates company's future.
C.It makes workforce totally unnecessary.D.It changes traditional working ways.
2. What point have machines evolved to today?
A.Doing repetitive work.B.Doing physical tasks.
C.Doing translation work.D.Doing reproducing tasks.
3. Which sides are involved in the zero-sum game?
A.Al-based machine and humans.B.Minds and bodies.
C.Future and past.D.Imagination and Reality.
4. What is the last paragraph mainly about?
A.Al plays a vital role in the workplace.B.Human has its own advantages over Al.
C.Al and humans have the same qualities.D.Al is sure to replace humans one day.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约260词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇应用文,文章介绍了上海科技馆推出的“美丽的新科幻世界”展览。

【推荐1】Children’s Sci-fi Art Predicts Extraordinary Future

More than 80 sci-fi artworks are on display at the Shanghai Science and Technology Museum, showing a beautiful yet puzzling future. The “Brave New Sci-Fi World” exhibition features paintings and art installations (设备) by students from Shanghai, Beijing, Chongqing and other cities. They imagine the future as a world where robots and human beings co-exist.

Ru Chen, from Shanghai New Putuo Primary School, has pictured a robot chameleon (变色龙) to be used in outer space to aid in the search and rescue of human beings in case of danger.

Li Jiaqi from Guangzhou Dongfeng East Road Primary School has painted a city where advanced technologies are everywhere, and even the city itself turns into a large robot.

Huang Yanrui from Beijing Shijingshan Gucheng No. 2 Primary School imagines his rubber, pencil box and such stationery (文具) becoming conscious robots, and beginning to design future human beings.

Wang Zhihan, from Shanghai Shangde Experimental School and her schoolmates, stick electronic components on stone faces as a metaphor (隐喻) for the increasingly unclear boundaries between the reality and virtual world. “We hope to remind people never lose yourself in a world with advanced technologies,” she said.

The exhibition will last till November 4.

Opening hours:

Tuesdays-Sundays 9: 00- 17: 15; legal holidays 8: 45- 18: 30.

Transportation Guide:

Metro: Metro Line 2: Shanghai Science and Technology Museum Station.

Metro Line 4, Metro Line 6 and Metro Line 9: change to Metro Line 2 at the Century Avenue Station.

Bus Routes: Bus 184, 640, 794, 983, 984, 987, 1023, 640 inter-zonal bus will take you there.

1. Whose artwork is related with space?
A.Ru Chen’s.B.Li Jiaqi’s.C.Huang Yanrui’s.D.Wang Zhihan’s.
2. Where does the student with an imagination of stationery robots come from?
A.Shanghai.B.Guangzhou.C.Chongqing.D.Beijing.
3. Which line can directly take you to the museum?
A.Metro Line 2.B.Metro Line 4.C.Metro Line 6.D.Metro Line 9.
2023-10-05更新 | 174次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】As cities around the world try to be smart, some have become stupid instead.

So, what is a “stupid city”? It is a city that gives in to urban sprawl( 扩张), with people moving from central areas to less-crowded communities, said Mr. Nicholas You, a director of the Guangzhou Institute for Urban Innovation in China. Such communities are heavily reliant on cars.

Another problem Mr. You stressed is that public administration bodies in “stupid cities’’ tend to work alone, refusing to share data that could help develop solutions to urban problems. He made the point during a discussion on urban transformation in Asia, saying, “A real smart city is one that looks at everything as a whole—you can’t look at water issues without looking at energy.”

A South Korean member, Mr. Jong Sung Hwang, suggested that some of the biggest barriers to creating a smart city are cultural. South Korean society is less forgiving of mistakes, noted Mr. Jong. For example, some in Seoul tried to push for an intelligent traffic system but were met with resistance from the police. He said, “We have ideas, data and even money, but we could not make it happen.”

India, however, is not adopting a one-size-fits-all approach to create smart cities for its 1.3 billion people, said a member from India.

In Singapore, which launched its Smart Nation initiative( 行 动 ) in 2014, the authorities fear that technology can worsen the divide between the haves and the have-nots, said Dr. Limin Hee, director for research at the Centre for Liveable Cities here. “Thankfully, many cities are considering such issues as how to make better use of data and technology to create smart cities,” she added.

1. What can we learn about a smart city?
A.It encourages urban expansion.
B.It has few people in its central areas.
C.It solves urban problems by sharing data.
D.It treats every issue as a separate unit.
2. Why is it impossible to push an intelligent traffic system in Seoul?
A.People are tolerant of mistakes.
B.The police are afraid of making mistakes.
C.The government is lacking enough money.
D.The traffic system in Seoul is very advanced.
3. What problem might India face when creating smart cities?
A.Its population is decreasing.
B.It has no examples to follow.
C.It fails to adopt a universally right system.
D.It lacks advanced technologies.
4. What do Singaporean authorities worry about the technology?
A.The disapproval of the public.
B.More money spent than expected.
C.The development of cities being limited.
D.The increasing gap between the rich and the poor.
2021-06-07更新 | 127次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约540词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】Online Learning’s Big Issue

Supporters of education technology have made remarkable promises over the past two decades that by 2019, hall of all secondary school courses would be online; videos and practice problems can let students learn mathematics at their own pace, or that typical students left alone with internet-connected computers can learn anything without the help of schools or teachers.

Then in 2020, people around the world were forced to turn to online learning as the coronavirus pandemic shut down schools serving more than 1 billion students. It was education technology’s big moment, but for many students and families, remote learning has been a disappointment. When the world needs it most, why has education technology seemed so dull?

Educational software has a long history, but throughout this history there have been two major challenges. The first is that most people depend on human connection to maintain their motivation. When a student closes their laptop in frustration in a classroom, someone can see it and respond. When the same thing happens while using an education technology product, human connections are shut down with it. Well-designed online learning environments can encourage meaningful relationships, but in practice, many online students struggle to stay focused.

The second challenge is that the mapping out of different courses are complex. On any given day in a school, one teacher may introduce a new sound-letter mapping in phonics, another finish a unit on plate tectonics (板块构造学), and a third facilitate a seminar on Hamlet. In a traditional classroom setting, a teacher could simply walk down the hall straight into a new classroom and teach an entirely different subject matter. But for every new curriculum area for education technology, new content, tools, resources and assessments need to be developed.

Assessments are also a thorny challenge. In some domains, like mathematics and computer science, education technology can instantly detect when a student solves a problem or creates a correctly functioning computer program. We can reward students for getting answers correct, push them towards resources when they get things wrong, and create the feedback loops of instruction, assessment and repetition that good learning requires.

Unfortunately, the same approach doesn’t work so well in other areas. We can ask students to calculate how far a tectonic plate might move given a certain speed and time and computers involved would easily be able to instantly evaluate a correct numerical answer. But if we ask students to write a paragraph that explains how plate tectonics work, computers can’t reliably identify correct, partially correct and incorrect responses. Computers cannot reliably evaluate how humans reason from evidence, and reasoning from evidence is the very core of schooling.

Education technology has long promised to transform education, but at best, the field has developed individual tools for inches of the curriculum. For large areas of school learning, we don’t have online tools or resources that are any better than a printed textbook. For most teachers, the road to more effective teaching with technology looks less like a transformation, and more like tinkering: a slow and steady process towards identifying the right tool or approach for particular students in a particular context.

1. The first two paragraphs indicate that ________.
A.education technology is advancing as fast as expected
B.online education is taking the place of conventional teaching
C.the predictions about the rise of education technology were overly optimistic
D.education technology has played an important role during coronavirus pandemic
2. Paragraph 4 mainly tells us that ________.
A.students are under pressure to learn all the subjects
B.education technology is not ready for all curriculum areas
C.teachers lack new tools and resources when teaching new content
D.a teacher can teach only one subject while education technology can teach many
3. So far, education technology has managed to ________.
A.overtake printed textbooks
B.offer flexible, large-scale teaching tools
C.provide individual tools in a particular field
D.evaluate reliably how humans reason from evidence
4. The author might agree that ________.
A.education technology may improve how we connect as humans
B.teachers should help develop tools and resources of education technology
C.education technology will soon bring about an educational transformation
D.teachers need to think carefully before they utilize technology in their teaching
2021-04-12更新 | 264次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般