组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自我 > 健康 > 医疗
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:135 题号:19071176

Speaking to The Guardian at the Third International Conference on Human genetic editing, Prof Jennifer Doudna, a 2020 Nobel chemistry prize winner, said, “We’ll definitely be seeing genetic therapies (治疗;疗法) for heart diseases, brain diseases, and eye conditions.” But she warned, “One of the riskiest and most realistic potentials is that trials of gene editing in embryos (胚胎) will probably follow.”

The technology can and will smooth the way for therapies for enhancing healthy humans, to make them faster, smarter, stronger, or more resistant to diseases, though enhancement would be more difficult than mending single faulty genes. According to the experts at the conference, including geneticists, public health researchers and philosophers, a wave of gene editing therapies were expected to reach clinics in the next five years or so. The therapies will correct disease-causing disorders in tissues and organs and become mature as researchers work out how to make multiple edits at once and reach difficult areas such as parts of the brain.

However, Doudna and the other experts also expressed their concern that the next generation of advanced genetic therapies raises serious issues that must be tackled to ensure the technology benefits patients and society. Prof Françoise Baylis, a philosopher at Dalhousie University in Canada, was worried that in addition to the sure sign of genetic enhancement coming, the cost of the new therapies would be too high for much of the global population. Prof Mayana Zatz, at the University of São Paulo, Brazil, said she was against editing genes for improvement but added, “There will always be people ready to pay for it in private clinics and it will be difficult to stop.”

One conclusion almost all experts shared was that while all these potential problems and risks did exist, a future full of promise would definitely be witnessed. After all, it is not technology itself but ways in which people employ it that decide the result.

1. Which is not considered as beneficial by Prof Jennifer Doudna?
A.Gene editing for diseases in heart.
B.Gene editing for diseases in brain.
C.Gene editing for diseases in embryos.
D.Gene editing for diseases in eyes.
2. What can we infer in paragraph 2?
A.Genetic therapies are more difficult than mending.
B.Society will benefit from genetic therapies entirely.
C.Genetic therapies have already reached some clinics.
D.All disorders can’t be corrected by genetic therapies.
3. What did Prof Françoise Baylis and Prof Mayana Zatz agree on?
A.Editing genes for improvement is unavoidable.
B.Editing genes for improvement is promising.
C.The cost of the new therapies would be too high.
D.Editing genes for improvement should carry on.
4. What is the attitude of most experts towards genetic therapies in the text?
A.Objective.B.Negative.C.Supportive.D.Unconcerned.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐1】Jenny was driving her six-year-old son, Tony, to his piano lesson. They were late, and Jenny was beginning to think she should have given it up. There was always so much to do, and Jenny recently helped with an operation. She was tired. The storm and ice roads added to her tension. Maybe she should turn the car around.

“Mom!” Tony cried. “Look!” Just ahead a car had lost control on the patch of ice. As Jenny tapped the brakes, the other car wildly rolled over; then crashed sideways into a telephone pole.

Jenny pulled over, stopped and threw open her door. Thank goodness she knew her job well—she might be able to help these unfortunate passengers. Then she paused. What about Tony? She couldn’t take him with her. Little boys shouldn’t see scenes like that. But was it safe to leave him alone? What if their car were hit from behind? For a brief moment Jenny considered going on her way.

She asked Tony to stay in the car and ran, slipping and sliding, toward the crash site. It was worse than she’s feared. Two girls of high school age in the car. One was killed. The driver, however, was still breathing. Jenny quickly applied pressure to the wound in the teenager’s head while her practiced eye checked the other injuries. A broken leg, maybe two, along with probable internal bleeding. But if help came soon, the girl would live.

A trucker had pulled up and was calling for help on his cellphone. Soon ambulance and rescue workers came. “Good job,” one said while examining the wounds. “You probably saved her life!” Later the families of the victims came to meet Jenny, expressing their gratitude for the help she had offered.

1. What was Jenny doing when the accident happened?
A.She was helping with an operation.
B.She was driving for her son’s lesson.
C.She was driving home with her son.
D.She was making a telephone for help.
2. What does Jenny do according to the passage?
A.A taxi-driver.B.A firefighter.
C.A nurse.D.A teacher.
3. The car accident was caused by ________.
A.the tiredness of the driver
B.the truck who was telephoning while driving
C.the students’ careless driving
D.the bad weather and terrible road conditions
4. Before going to rescue the wounded, Jenny worried a lot about ________.
A.her poor skills of saving people
B.her little son’s safety in the car
C.her little son’s piano lesson
D.the students killed in the accident
5. We can infer from the passage that ________.
A.the driver was saved thanks to Jenny’s timely help
B.there were at least two deaths in the car accident
C.Jenny was to blame for the terrible car accident
D.Jenny was late for his piano lessons for this accident
2019-08-09更新 | 269次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐2】If some parts of a body are very sick or damaged, then doctors might need to remove them. Another way doctors can help is to grow new tissue to replace what is sick or damaged. This is called regenerative medicine (再生医学).

Regenerative medicine sounds like something from a science fiction movie but it is not a new idea. Inside our bones, we have something called ‘marrow’, which makes our blood and keeps us healthy. Doctors have been giving sick people the bone marrow from other healthy people for the last 30 or 40 years, and this is a kind of regenerative medicine.

Newer developments in regenerative medicine include growing new skin in a laboratory and using it to help people who have been hurt in fires or accidents. Another example of regenerative medicine is a technique developed from studying frogs and mice. When cells are old, like in adults, they can’t change what they do in our bodies. For example, a skin cell can’t change into an eye cell. But when cells are very young, they can become any cell type. These young cells are called stem cells, and doctors can use them to grow any type of tissue, such as skin, heart or eye. John Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka won the 2012 Nobel Prize for their studies in this area.

Professor Fiona Watt, from the Centre of Regenerative Medicine at King’s College, London, believes that regenerative medicine is so exciting because many different kinds of experts need to work together. 3D printers may be used to print new bones by experts, who need to work closely with university scientists and the surgeons who do the operations in hospitals.

We can not yet grow new arms or legs for people, but the science fiction dream of regenerative medicine may be closer than we think. Perhaps in the future, doctors will be able to grow whole new bodies for us.

1. What’s the main idea of the passage?
A.How to help very sick or damaged people.
B.Regenerative medicine and science fiction.
C.We can grow our new bodies in the future.
D.Regenerative medicine and its development.
2. Which of the following is right according to this passage?
A.Marrow can help grow new bones.
B.Stem cell can be used to grow any type of tissue.
C.Surgeons now use 3D printers to print new bones.
D.Regenerative medicine is a new science in medicine.
3. What’s the writer’s attitude to the development in regenerative medicine?
A.Pessimistic.B.Optimistic.
C.Doubtful.D.Indifferent.
2018-04-03更新 | 116次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐3】The U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a debatable Alzheimer's treatment, the first that promises to slow the disease's destruction in the brain.

The drug, aducanumab, is also the first new Alzheimer's treatment approved since 2003.However, in 2019, aducanumab was nearly abandoned after it appeared unlikely to succeed in two clinical trials. But after reanalyzing more data, the drug's developer Biogen saw signs indicating the drug might work, and decided to pursue FDA approval.

Still, today's decision concerns some doctors and scientists because they aren't convinced that the drug actually works. Approving a drug that's not effective would offer patients false hope, those experts argue. “This is a great day for Biogen but a dark day for the field of Alzheimer's research,” says Michael Greicius, a neurologist at Stanford. Pushing forward on the “illusion of progress,” he says, “will come at a cost to genuine progress in finding an effective treatment for this destructive disease.”

Others disagree that the evidence is slim, and are excited about having a new tool to fight a disease that has escaped an effective treatment for so long. “We have been waiting decades for this,” says Maria Carrillo, an expert at the Alzheimer's Association. A drug that delays decline due to Alzheimer's promises patients “to sustain independence and to hold onto memories longer,” she says.

The drug targets the sticky protein—A-beta(淀粉样蛋白). Some researchers suspect that in Alzheimer's, A-beta confuses connections between nerve cells and damages brain tissue, ultimately causing Alzheimer's symptoms. But that idea is still unsettled. Brain scans reveal that aducanumab is effective at reducing A-beta in the brain. What's less clear is whether this reduction comes with consistent improvements in people's quality of life.

1. What does paragraph 2 mainly tell us about aducanumab?
A.Its bitter failure in clinical trials.
B.Its tough path to getting recognized.
C.Its medical value in treating Alzheimer's.
D.Its challenging process of being produced.
2. What does the underlined word “illusion” in paragraph 3 mean?
A.Proof.B.Significance.C.Prospect.D.Misunderstanding.
3. What is Maria Carrillo's attitude toward aducanumab?
A.Unconcerned.B.Doubtful.C.Positive.D.Intolerant.
4. What can we infer from the last paragraph?
A.A-beta in human body should be removed.
B.Aducanumab has potentially serious side effects.
C.A-beta's decrease improves people's quality of life.
D.Further tests on aducanumab need to be carried out.
2021-07-11更新 | 246次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般