Some of us are better at helping others than we are at looking after ourselves. Maybe you are like this. Maybe you know someone who is. These are people who-are easy to have Super-Helper Syndrome (综合征) where you feel it is a must to help others but don’t look after your own needs.
It may bring hate. It’s easy to say you don’t want anything in return, but the reality is that it’s hard going indefinitely if you get little reward. At least you deserve thanks and recognition.
It may bring exploitation(剥削). If you never express any needs, then it’s easy and convenient for other people to act as if you don’t have any.
It may bring self-criticism.
A.It may bring burnout |
B.It’s vital to spot the signs early |
C.It may result in serious diseases |
D.Helpers’ guilt typically operates on two levels |
E.You will feel angry about others if you receive none |
F.And it’s also convenient for other people to take advantage of your help |
G.It’s important to take care of your own mental health as well as helping others |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】How to Overcome Social Anxiety
Social anxiety is a common type of anxiety disorder.
A lot of people with social anxiety feel ashamed of getting help from a professional, but regular visits with a therapist(治疗专家) will help in so many ways. There are many therapists who specialize in dealing with social anxiety, so try to get help to properly deal with the anxiety attacks.
List down the things that stress you out
List down all your situations that can cause anxiety according to its levels you feel.
Create realistic and objective goals
Set a realistic and objective goal for every plan you make. Make sure that you are setting your goals correctly.
A.Seek professional help |
B.Try to hide yourself away from others |
C.Start off by exposing yourself to the easiest ones |
D.Above all, you'd better change the way you think |
E.Many people are suffering social anxiety nowadays |
F.Non-realistic targets may just bring you disappointment in the long run |
G.People with it fear the negative or even positive evaluation of others around them |
【推荐2】Measles (麻疹), which once killed 1450 children each year and disabled even more, was nearly wiped out in the United States 14 years ago by the universal use of the MMR vaccine (疫苗). But the disease is making a comeback, caused by a growing anti-vaccine movement and misinformation that is spreading quickly. Already this year, 115 measles cases have been reported in the USA, compared with 189 for all of last year.
The numbers might sound small, but they are the leading edge of a dangerous trend. When vaccination rates are very high, as they still are in the nation as a whole, everyone is protected. This is called “herd immunity”, which protects the people who get hurt easily, including those who can’t be vaccinated for medical reasons, babies too young to get vaccinated and people on whom the vaccine doesn’t work.
But herd immunity works only when nearly the whole herd joins in. When some refuse vaccination and seek a free ride, immunity breaks down and everyone is in even bigger danger.
That’s exactly what is happening in small neighborhoods around the country from Orange County, California, where 22 measles cases were reported this month, to Brooklyn, N.Y., where a 17-year-old caused an outbreak last year.
The resistance to vaccine has continued for decades, and it is driven by a real but very small risk. Those who refuse to take that risk selfishly make others suffer.
Making things worse are state laws that make it too easy to opt out (决定不参加) of what are supposed to be required vaccines for all children entering kindergarten. Seventeen states allow parents to get an exemption (豁免), sometimes just by signing a paper saying they personally object to a vaccine.
Now, several states are moving to tighten laws by adding new regulations for opting out. But no one does enough to limit exemptions.
Parents ought to be able to opt out only for limited medical or religious reasons. But personal opinions? Not good enough. Everyone enjoys the life-saving benefits vaccines provide, but they’ll exist only as long as everyone shares in the risks.
1. The first two paragraphs suggest that .A.a small number of measles cases can start a dangerous trend |
B.the outbreak of measles attracts the public attention |
C.anti-vaccine movement has its medical reasons |
D.information about measles spreads quickly |
A.exemptions are allowed | B.several vaccines are used together |
C.the whole neighborhood involved in | D.new regulations are added to the state laws |
A.To introduce the idea of exemption. | B.To discuss methods to cure measles. |
C.To stress the importance of vaccination. | D.To appeal for equal rights in medical treatment. |
【推荐3】Nowadays, children spend less time in the fresh air. Many of them are addicted to a screen either on a computer or a TV—they seem to be living in a virtual world. They have lost touch with nature.
But now 400 organizations in the UK, from playgroups to the National Health Service, are encouraging children to have some “wild time”. They want kids to swap at least 30 minutes of watching TV or playing computer games for time playing outside. Activities such as building dens, climbing trees, rummaging for conkers and playing hide and seek are just some of the things kids can do. Even if they live in a city, they can go on adventures in the garden or the park.
Children often need a helping hand from mum and dad. They need to be shown what to do and where to go. Andy Simpson from National Health Service says, “We want parents to see what this magical wonder product does for their kids’ development, independence and creativity, by giving wild time a go.”
So despite the complicated world that young people grow up in now, it seems that going back to basics and experiencing “nature’s playground” is what modern children need. David Bond from Project Wild Thing says, “We need to make more space for wild time in children’s daily routine, freeing this generation of kids to have the sort of experiences that many of us took for granted.”
This might sound a bit old-fashioned to you or maybe, like me, it’s made you think about sticking on your boots, getting outdoors and reliving your childhood. There’s no age limit on enjoying yourself!
1. What makes children lose touch with nature?A.Playing hide and seek. | B.Going on adventures in parks. |
C.Building dens frequently. | D.Being addicted to a screen. |
A.Teachers. | B.Parents. | C.Children. | D.Experts. |
A.What modern children need is spiritual satisfaction. |
B.Children always take it for granted to play outside. |
C.Children need more time to get close to nature. |
D.Parents should make larger rooms for kids to study. |
A.People at any age can enjoy wild time. | B.Watching TV is a good way to learn about nature. |
C.Everyone lives in a high-pressure world. | D.Adults all desire to go back to childhood. |
【推荐1】Dogs greet other dogs’ noses first, sniffing (嗅) each other from head to tail. People are not so open about the process of sniffing, but smell is important in human relations, too. There is also evidence that humans can infer relationship and emotional states and even discover disease through smell.
Now, Inbal Ravreby, Kobi Snitz and Noam Sobel of the Weizmann Institute of Science have gone a step further. As they report in Science Advances, the three researchers started their first experiment by testing the smells of 20 pairs of familiar and same-sex friends. They employed an electronic nose (e-nose) and two groups of human “smellers”.
The e-nose used a set of gas sensors to assess T-shirts worn by participants. One group of human smellers were given pairs of these shirts and asked to rate how similar they smelt. Those in the other group were asked to rate the smells of individual T-shirts on five dimensions (维度): pleasantness, intensity, attractiveness, competence and warmth. Both approaches produced the same result. The T-shirts of friends smelt more similar to each other than did the T-shirts of strangers.
Does friendship cause similarity of smell, or does similarity of smell cause friendship? The three researchers investigated whether there were positive interactions between strangers by using the e-nose measurement. They collected the smells of another 17 volunteers with e-nose, and then asked the participants to play a mirroring game.
That game involved silently mirroring another individual’s hand movements, Participants were paired up by chance and their reactions were recorded. After each interaction, they demonstrated how close they felt to their fellow gamer by overlapping two circles (one representing themselves, the other their partner). The more similar the two electronic smell signatures were, the greater the overlap. Participants also rated the quality of their interaction in the game along 12 dimensions of feelings that define friendship, Similar smells were consistent with positive ratings for nine of these dimensions. However, two participants smelling alike did not mean they were any more accurate at the mirroring game than others.
Why smell might play a role in forming friendships remains obscure. Other qualities related to being friends, including age, appearance, and education, are either immediately obvious or rapidly become so. But while some individuals have strong body smell, many do not. It is present. But it is subliminal (潜意识的). Dr Ravreby guesses that there may be “an evolutionary advantage in having friends that are genetically similar to us”. Body smell is known to be linked with genetic make-up. Smelling similar to others may thus allow subliminal inferences about genetic similarity to be drawn.
1. What can we learn from the first experiment?
A.Friends smell like one another. |
B.Friends tend to sniff each other. |
C.The smell can be judged on five dimensions. |
D.The T-shirts of friends smell the same to each other. |
A.enrich the dimensions that define friendship |
B.prove strangers smell more alike after positive interactions |
C.test whether strangers can develop friendship in the process |
D.explore the relationship between similarity of smell and friendship |
A.Unacceptable. | B.Unchanged. | C.Unclear. | D.Unrealistic. |
A.Body smells have effects on genetic make-up |
B.People who have similar smells may have similar genes. |
C.Body smells become similar after people becoming friends. |
D.Two participants smelling alike performed better in the game than others. |
【推荐2】While we may think it feels good to complain, complaining has some bad effects associated with it.
Why isn't complaining beneficial? Research shows that it connects our brain with negativity. The brain is designed to work efficiently. This means that when we repeat a thought, negative or positive, the nerve cells form a bridge between each other to pass information in a higher speed. Therefore, the next time we have a similar type of thought, it is more easily passed. This explains why certain thought patterns become habits.
Yet the harmful effects don't stop there. A study shows that complaining causes the hippocampus (海马区), which plays a vital role in problem-solving, to become smaller. In addition to causing brain damage, complaining also releases a stress hormone: cortisol, a kind of chemical the body produces when we meet with some danger. Constantly having a high level of cortisol results in high blood pressure, high blood sugar, and lower immunity.
The ill effects of our complaining aren't just limited to ourselves: they also involve those around us. We tend to mirror the moods of our friends. For this reason, we should be cautious about having stubborn complainers in our circle of acquaintances and companions.
The best way to deal with constant negativity is to develop a sense of gratitude. Just like complaining acts as a poison, gratitude acts as a medicine. Research shows it lowers cortisol levels by 23 percent, as well as reduces blood pressure and blood sugar. It also decreases tiredness and depression. Gratitude is the perfect cure for complaining, a behavior that steals our brain power, happiness and physical well-being.
What have you observed about the effects of complaining in your own life or in the lives of others? Have you noticed that when you are grateful, you feel better all over? Please share your thoughts in the comments section below.
1. What do paragraphs 2-3 mainly talk about?A.The bad effects of complaining on brain power. |
B.The decrease of a vital part of our brain. |
C.The diseases caused by complaining. |
D.The reason why certain thought patterns become habits. |
A.Gratitude functions as an effective cure for cortisol. |
B.Having a high level of cortisol can lead to many health problems. |
C.Our body produces cortisol when we feel excited. |
D.Cortisol is a chemical that can cause brain damage. |
A.Indifferent. | B.Neutral. | C.Skeptical. | D.Disapproving. |
A.To encourage readers to share ideas. |
B.To introduce different emotions. |
C.To analyze the reasons for complaining. |
D.To inform readers the effects of complaining. |
【推荐3】Three scientists who studied how cells sense and adapt to oxygen levels have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. William G. Kaelin, Jr. of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard University, Sir Peter J. Ratcliffe of Oxford University and the Francis Crick Institute, and Gregg L. Semenza of Johns Hopkins University were jointly awarded the prize.
“The meaningful discoveries by this year’s Nobel winners showed life’s most adaptive processes,” Randall Johnson, a member of the Nobel Assembly at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute said. “The three physicians found the molecular switch(分子开关)that regulates how our cells adapt when oxygen levels drop.”
“Cells and tissues are constantly experiencing changes in oxygen availability,” Johnson said. “As an embryo(胚胎) grows and develops, and as muscles work, the oxygen available changes as the tissues themselves change. Cells need a way to adjust to the amount of oxygen they have, while still doing their important jobs.”
The committee said that the discoveries are vital for physiology and could exploit new strategies to fight anemia, cancer and many other diseases.
Kaelin was born in New York and received an M. D. from Duke University. He did his specialist training in internal medicine and oncology at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, and at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
Ratcliffe was born in Lancashire, the United Kingdom, and studied medicine at Gonville and Caius College at Cambridge University and did his specialist training in nephrology at Oxford. He is the director of clinical research at the Francis Crick Institute in London and a member of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research.
Semenza was born in New York. He obtained a B. A. in biology from Harvard and his M. D. from the University of Pennsylvania. He did his specialist training in pediatrics at Duke University. He is the director of the Vascular Research Program at the Johns Hopkins Institute for Cell Engineering.
1. What can we know about the three scientists?A.They studied different fields. |
B.They shared one prize. |
C.They researched heart disease. |
D.They found the function of embryos. |
A.Important. | B.Meaningless. |
C.Interesting. | D.Disappointing. |
A.Develop. | B.Handle. | C.Stress. | D.Follow. |
A.The three scientists’ achievements. |
B.The influence of the discoveries. |
C.The example set by the three scientists. |
D.The introduction of the three scientists. |