组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自我 > 健康 > 疾病
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:128 题号:22155583

Humans work hard to avoid viruses. Sick people are isolated, diseased animals are killed and fields of infected crops are fired up. Reviving(复活)an ancient virus would surely be a disaster.

But a new study led by Fiddamanfrom Oxford, challenges this conventional wisdom. It shows how the revival of an ancient virus can unlock the secrets of its evolution.

The virus in the study is Marek’s disease virus(MDV), killing more than 90% of chickens. Yet when it was discovered in 1907, MDV rarely caused death.

Dr Fiddaman wondered whether its new-found virulence(毒性)was a result of large structural changes. To find out, he and his colleagues got their hands on nearly 1,000 chicken bones from ancient times across Europe and Asia, some of them up to 2000 years old. Sections of DNA from these remains were mapped on to the ones of today’s virus.

As the authors pieced together the sets of genes of ancient MDV, however, they noticed that the genes were arranged identically to those in modern species. It suggests that the increased virulence resulted not from large structural changes, but from point mutations(突变). In particular, changes had occurred in the arrangement of a gene called MEQ, which has an essential role in tumour(肿瘤)formation.

This discovery suggests that the ancient MDV may not have been able to cause tumours. To test this assumption, Dr Fiddaman followed up with a daring experiment. He made the ancient form of the MEQ gene and shoot it into living chicken cells. It did not turn on any of the genes associated with tumour formation. In comparison, a modern MEQ gene quickly showed its tendency to cause tumours.

By combining ancient and modern genetic biology, the methods pioneered in the paper reveal how, and more importantly why, any virus mutates. That could help scientists tackle other viruses that pull on the purse-strings of farmers —by designing new vaccines(疫苗), for instance— or even to work out how to prevent another global pandemic.

1. What is widely acknowledged about the revival of an ancient virus?
A.It is a challenging task.B.It reveals the virus evolution.
C.It means a disaster for humans.D.It helps people fight diseases.
2. What caused the virulence change of MDV?
A.Point mutations in MEQ.B.The occurrance of a new gene.
C.The reproduction of the ancient MDV.D.Large structural changes in modern species.
3. How did Dr Fiddaman test the assumption?
A.By investigating a typical case.B.By conducting a field survey.
C.By studying the related theories.D.By doing a comparative experiment.
4. What can we infer from the last paragraph?
A.Viruses weaken gradually when they mutate.
B.The finding throws light on handling other viruses.
C.A global pandemic requires a world effort to end it.
D.Farmers will face more complex challenges than before.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】I wished I had known earlier the fact that I was a low achiever because there was a reason beyond my control. Then I needn’t have worked so hard in my late twenties and early thirties. But I just didn’t know that. I was writing and writing. I was working for no other reason than to hear people praise me.

Most people who go through university read at least twice as fast as I do. I can never tell my left from my right. I avoid dialing a telephone if I can help it, because I sometimes have to try three times before getting the number right. I hear that recording “The number you have reached is not in service” more than any man on earth.

Despite my weaknesses I view my dyslexia (difficulty in reading) as a gift, not a curse(诅咒). Many dyslexics are good at right brain, namely abstract thought, and that is what my key of creative writing is. I’m starting with nothing and coming up with something that didn’t exist before. That’s my strong point. I owe my career to Ralph Salisbury, my writing instructor at the University of Oregon, who looked past my misspellings and gave me encouragement and hope. I just carried on and never looked back. I’m also very “visual”. This means nothing in school, but when I write books or scripts, I’m seeing everything in my imagination. I write quickly. I go like the wind and can get up to 15 pages a day. Writing is not the problem. I have no problem downloading; it is inputting where things get messed up.

The real fear I have for dyslexics is not that they have to struggle with messy input, but that they will quit on themselves before they finish school. Parents have to create victories whenever they can, whether it is music, sports or the arts. You want your dyslexic child to be able to say, “Yeah, reading is hard. But I have these other things I can do.”

1. From Paragraph 3 we can know that ______
A.The author was grateful to his writing instructor
B.The author often complained about his dyslexia
C.The author had trouble with both inputting and outputting.
D.Having problem in inputting, the author wrote slowly.
2. For dyslexics, the author thinks that_________.
A.they should work as hard as himself
B.they had better choose to drop out of school
C.they should be constantly encouraged
D.they should put their hearts into reading
3. Which of the following proverbs can best summarize the main idea of the passage?
A.He who laughs last laughs best.
B.Where there is a will, there is a way.
C.Reading enriches the mind.
D.When God closes a door, somewhere he opens a window.
4. What kind of man is the writer?
A.Open-minded and optimisticB.diligent and generous
C.clever but selfishD.kind but useless
2018-09-21更新 | 132次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】Researchers have found depression is linked to areas of the brain shrinking in size but when depression is paired with anxiety one area of the brain becomes greatly larger.

A new study, published in the Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, looked at more than 10,000 people to find the effects of depression and anxiety on brain volume, The study shows depression has a pronounced impact on the hippocampus, the part of the brain linked to memory and learning, shrinking it.

In contrast, the study found that when depression and anxiety occur together, it leads to an increase in size of the part of the brain linked to emotions, the amygdala, “Many studies looking at the effects of depression on brain do not account for the fact that people who have depression often experience anxiety too,” study lead and Ph.D. researcher Ms. Daniela Oyarce said.

Depression is considered a serious medical condition worldwide, and one in six Ausualians currently experience depression, anxiety, or both, “We found people who have depression alone have lower brain volumes in many areas of the brain, and in particular the hippocampus,” Ms. Daniela Oyarce said. “This becomes even more relevant later in life because a smaller hippocampus is a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease and may speed the development of dementia.”

A particularly important finding of this research is that people who had both depression and anxiety had less shrinkage in many brain areas and even an increase in the amygdala. This indicates that the true effects of depression on the brain has been underestimated because of an opposite effect in the amygdala. “Anxiety lowers the effects of depression on brain volume sizes by three percent on average—somewhat hiding the true shrinking effects of depression,” Ms. Daniela Oyarce said.

“More research is needed into how anxiety lowers the effects of depression, but for the amygdala, perhaps anxiety leads to overactivity,” Ms. Daniela Oyarce added.

1. Which aspect of the brain is affected by depression?
A.SurfaceB.FunctionC.Shape.D.Volume.
2. What function is the amygdala related to?
A.Repair.B.Emotions.C.Learning.D.Language.
3. What is paragraph 4 mainly about?
A.The risk caused by depression.
B.The symptoms of depression.
C.The current situation of patients with depression.
D.The relationship between depression and anxiety.
4. What will happen when depression is paired with anxiety?
A.The amygdala will shrink.B.The amygdala will increase.
C.The hippocampus will increase.D.The brain volumes will shrink.
2021-05-17更新 | 100次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约410词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐3】For a wide range of diseases, diagnosis comes later in life for women than for men, according to a large Danish study. Researchers don’t know whether the later diagnoses are due to genetics, the environment, possible biases in the healthcare system - or some combination of reasons.

The study of health data from 6.9 million Danish people found that across hundreds of diseases, women on average were diagnosed when they were about four years older than the age at which the conditions were recognized in men. “We’re not just looking at one disease here, we’re looking at all diseases and we are looking at an entire population, from cradle to grave,” lead author Soren Brunak from the University of Copenhagen told Reuters Health by phone. On average, women received cancer diagnoses 2.5 years after men. They received diagnoses for metabolic diseases like diabetes 4.5 years later. “This actually surprised us quite a lot,” Brunak said. “Men generally have a tendency to get to the doctor later. So presumably the difference in onset is even larger.”

Brunak and his team considered incidence rates of diseases in the 18 broad categories of the ICD-10 diagnosis system managed by the World Health Organization. The study wasn’t designed to explain the causes of the differences. Another limitation is that researchers only looked at diagnoses made in hospitalized patients.

Dr. Noel Bairey Merz, director of the Barbra Streisand Women’s Heart Center at the Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, who was not involved in the study, pointed out to Reuters Health that the study therefore lacks information on age at diagnosis for people who didn't require hospitalization. “On the other hand,” she said, “being hospitalized is a sign of a serious illness, so that adds significance to the diagnosis and supports that disease onset may be later in women.”

Brunak’s study, published in Nature Communications, showed that the bone-thinning disease osteoporosis was a notable exception to the trend. Here, women were typically diagnosed before they suffered a fracture, while the opposite was true for men.

“I am fascinated by this study, which generally confirms all that I present in my Stanford course on Sex and Gender in Human Physiology and Disease,”said Marcia Stefanick, Director of Stanford University’s Women’s Health and Sex Differences in Medicine Center.

1. What can we know from the research?
A.Women were diagnosed four years later than men for any diseases.
B.Only the adults were involved in the research.
C.On average, women were diagnosed later than men for the same disease.
D.Women tend to go to the doctor later than men.
2. What does the underlined word “onset” in Paragraph 2 probably mean?
A.spreadB.beginning
C.symptomD.ending
3. What can we infer from the fourth paragraph?
A.Dr. Merz made proper comments on the research.
B.Dr. Merz was not willing to participate in the research.
C.Dr. Merz didn’t think much of the research.
D.Being hospitalized is a sign of getting a serious illness.
4. What’s Marcia Stefanick’s attitude towards the research?
A.criticalB.uninterested
C.favourableD.indifferent
2021-01-17更新 | 25次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般