组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:35 题号:22762735

Imagine this: You’re at a movie theater food stand loading up on snacks. You have a choice of a small, medium or large soda. The small is $3.50 and the large is $5.50. It’s a tough decision: The small size may not last you through the whole movie, but $5.50 for some sugary drink seems unreasonable. But there’s a third option (选择), a medium soda for $5.25. The medium might be just right for you, but the large only cost a quarter more. If you’re like the majority of people, you end up buying the large.

If you’re wondering who would purchase the medium soda, the answer is almost no one. Actually, there’s a good chance that the marketing department purposely priced the medium soda as a decoy (诱饵), making you more likely to buy the large soda rather than the small.

I have written about this unique human nature previously with my friend Dan Ariely, who, after noticing pricing for subscription (订阅) to The Economist, studied this phenomenon extensively. The digital subscription was $59, the print subscription was $125, and the print plus digital subscription was also $125. No one in their right mind would buy the print subscription when you could get digital as well for the same price, so why was it even an option? Ariely ran an experiment and found that when only the two “real” choices were offered, more people chose the less-expensive digital subscription. However, the bad option increased people’s likelihood of selecting the expensive print plus digital option.

Brain scientists call this effect “asymmetric dominance” and it means that people are attracted to the option that is closest to an obviously inferior (较差的) option. Marketing professors call it the decoy effect, which is certainly easier to remember. It works because of the way our brain assigns value when making choices. Value is rarely absolute; rather, we decide an object’s value relative to other choices. If more options are introduced, the value equation (方程) changes.

1. Why do the shops give the third option — the medium soda?
A.To offer people more choices.B.To give people the right size of soda.
C.To help people save some money.D.To earn more money.
2. What do we learn from Dan Ariely’s experiment?
A.The Economist’s print edition turns out to sell the best.
B.More readers choose the digital over the print edition.
C.Lower-priced goods attract more customers.
D.The Economist’s promotional strategy works.
3. From which website would you most probably find this text?
A.https://www.lifestyle.com/healthB.https://www.science.com/local
C.https://www.consumers.com/moneyD.https://www.education.com/science
4. How do we often assess the value of a product according to the text?
A.By considering its usefulness.B.By comparing it with other choices.
C.By examining its former value.D.By taking its low quality into account.
【知识点】 科普知识 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约490词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了什么是情商及情商的阴暗面。

【推荐1】When you hear “I have a dream…”, one of the most famous speeches in human history you’ll never have the idea how the audience on the scene were fueled by emotional intelligence. When Martin Luther King. Jr. presented his dream, he chose language that would stir the hearts of his audience. Delivering this electrifying (震撼性的) message required emotional intelligence — the ability to recognize, understand, and manage emotions.

Emotional intelligence has been highly recommended by leaders, policymakers, and educators as the solution to a wide range of social problems. Emotional intelligence is important, but the uncontrolled enthusiasm has obscured (掩盖) a dark side. New evidence shows that when people sharpen their emotional skills, they become better at controlling others. When you’re good at controlling your own emotions, you can hide your true feelings. When you know what others are feeling, you can motivate them to act against their own best interests.

Social scientists have begun to document this dark side of emotional intelligence. In a research led by University of Toronto professor Jochen Menges, when a leader gave an inspiring speech filled with emotion, the audience was less likely to scrutinize (细察) the message and remembered the content. Ironically (讽刺的是), audience members were so moved by the speech that they claimed to recall more of it.

The authors call this the awestruck effect,but it might just as easily be described as the dumbstruck effect. One observer reflected that Hitler’s persuasive impact came from his ability to strategically express emotions — he would “tear open his heart” — and these emotions affected his followers to the point that they would “stop thinking critically and just emote.”

Leaders who master emotions can rob us of our abilities to reason. If their values are out of step with our own, the results can be destructive. New evidence suggests that when people have self-serving motives, emotional intelligence becomes a weapon for controlling others.

Throwing light on this dark side of emotional intelligence is one mission of a research team led by University College London professor Martin Kilduff. According to these experts, emotional intelligence helps people disguise (伪装) one set of emotions while expressing another for personal gain. Professor Kilduff’s team writes, “The strategic disguise of one’s own emotions and the controlling of others’ emotions for strategic ends are behaviors evident not only on Shakespeare’s stage but also in the offices and corridors where power and influence are traded.”

Of course, people aren’t always using emotional intelligence for nefarious ends. More often than not high EQ is helpful in most aspects of our life. Emotional intelligence — like any skill — can be used for good or evil. So whether it is a gift or a curse lies in your hand.

1. Why does the author mention Martin Luther King, Jr?
A.To honor the great leader for his courage.
B.To recommend his speech to other leaders.
C.To introduce the major topic to readers.
D.To advocate a society with fewer problems.
2. What is the dumbstruck effect of Hitler’s emotional intelligence?
A.His followers would tear open their hearts to him.
B.His followers would express emotions strategically.
C.His followers would lose the ability to reason properly.
D.His followers would develop the self-serving motives.
3. How do people use their emotional intelligence for personal gain?
A.They disguise their true emotions and show another one.
B.They help their colleagues to buildup confidence.
C.They present their strategic behaviors on the stage.
D.They lower their own dignity to gain popularity.
4. Which may mean the same as the underlined word in the last paragraph?
A.Immoral.B.Unimportant.C.Illegal.D.Uncontrollable.
2024-03-24更新 | 37次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约410词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要讲述了新的发现认为人们运动后的疲劳是由大脑控制的,而不是“运动极限理论”所认为的是因为肌肉达到了极限造成的。

【推荐2】For more than one hundred years, a great number of scientists have believed that tiredness in athletes originates in the muscles(肌肉). Precise explanations have varied, but all have been based on the “Limitations Theory”. In other words, muscles tire because they hit a physical limit—they either run out of fuel or oxygen or they drown in harmful by-products(副产品).

In the past few years, however, Timothy Noakes from the University of Cape Town, South Africa, has examined this standard theory. Tiredness, he argues, is caused not by signals springing from overtaxed muscles, but is an emotional response which begins in the brain. The fundamental nature of his new theory is that the brain paces the muscles to keep them well back from the edge of tiredness. When the brain decides it’s time to quit, it creates unbearable muscle tiredness. This “Central Governor” theory remains controversial, but it does explain many puzzling aspects of athletic performance.

A recent discovery that Noakes calls the “lactic acid paradox” made him start researching this area seriously. Lactic acid is a by-product of exercise, and the increase of it is often mentioned as a cause of tiredness. But when research subjects exercise in certain conditions created artificially, they become tired even though lactic acid levels remain low. Nor has the oxygen content of their blood fallen too low for them to keep going. Obviously, something else was making them tire before they hit either of these physiological limits.

Noakes conducted an experiment with seven cyclists. It has long been known that during exercise, the body never uses 100% of the available muscle fibres(纤维). The amount used varies, but in some tasks such as this cycling test the body calls on about 30%. His team found that as tiredness set in, the electrical activity in cyclist’s legs declined—even when they were making a great effort to cycle as fast as they could.

To Noakes, this was strong evidence that the old theory was wrong. “The cyclists may have felt completely exhausted,” he says, “but their bodies actually had considerable reserves that they could theoretically tap by using a greater amount of the resting fibres.” This, he believes, is the proof that the brain is regulating the pace of the workout to hold the cyclists well back from the point of extreme tiredness.

1. Why do athletes feel tired according to “Limitations Theory”?
A.Because the muscles run out all energy.
B.Because the brain protects the muscles.
C.Because the scientists performed researches.
D.Because Noakes examined standard theory.
2. What has Noakes has found out?
A.Muscle fibres control athletes’ movements.
B.Lactic acid levels remain high in cycling tests.
C.Mental processes control the symptoms of tiredness
D.Different exercises use different amount of muscle fibres
3. What does “lactic acid paradox” have in common with Noakes?
A.The energy in human bodies can be balanced
B.Tiredness is a harmful by-product of exercise.
C.Lactic acid will not caused tiredness necessarily.
D.The oxygen content will rise after taking exercise.
4. Which is the most suitable title of the text?
A.Muscles or Brains?——Which brings athletes tiredness?
B.Lactic acid or Oxygen content——Which is vital for athletes?
C.Working out or Being relaxed——Which will better our health?
D.Common belief or New discovery——Which should we believe?
2024-03-03更新 | 34次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐3】This week Xingliang Zhang of Northwest University in China reports in Science the discovery of a new site full of soft-bodied animals that have never been seen before.

For soft-bodied animals to be preserved, something disastrous must take place. In the case of the world's two most famous Cambrian(寒武纪)sites, the Burgess Shale accumulation in Canada and the Chengjiang site, this disaster was a series of storms that dunked vast quantities of mud upon a community of animals, burying them alive.

The new site that Dr Zhang is reporting, known as Qingjiang, is similar to the others in that the animals seem to have been killed by a sudden mud burial. However, that is where the similarities end.

Qingjiang has produced over 20, 000 specimens(样本)thus far. Of these, 4, 351 have been properly analysed and are thought to represent around 100 groups of creatures. Dr Zhang and his colleagues estimate that 54 of these groups have never been seen before.

There are some familiar animals like cnidarians(刺细胞动物),but these also raise quite a lot of questions. Cnidarians exist widely in modern oceans and have simplistic bodies that suggest they evolved early during the rise of animal life. Given this, it was expected that cnidarians would be common in the sedimentary layers when the Burgess Shale and Chengjiang sites were first unearthed. But precisely the opposite proved true.

Qingjiang surprised Dr Zhang by being loaded with spectacularly well-preserved members of this soft-bodied group. Containing everything from delicate comb jellies to the medusae(水 母),Qingjiang reveals that these animals were well established at the time and rapidly multiplying in some environments. Precisely what these environmental differences were though, remains the subject of considerable inquiry. Anyway, the discovery of the fossils could make clear the diversity of extinct creatures as well as their connection with animals in modern times, said Zhao Fangchen, a researcher of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

1. What is the most probable reason of those soft-bodied animals' being so well-preserved?
A.Existing widely in some environments.
B.Being buried alive by a sudden mud.
C.Being abandoned during evolution.
D.Being well-established at the time.
2. In what way is Qingjiang site different from others?
A.100 groups of creatures were found in Qingjiang site for the first time.
B.Cnidarians were common in Burgess Shale and Chengjiang sites.
C.Cnidarians existed in large numbers in Qingjiang site.
D.The animals were killed by something disastrous.
3. What can we learn about cnidarians from the passage?
A.They became extinct because of sudden mud burials.
B.The environmental differences of their existence are clear now.
C.Their bodies are so simplistic that they can be easily wiped out.
D.They developed at the beginning of the appearance of animal life.
4. What is the main purpose of this passage?
A.To bring us some knowledge about Qingjiang site.
B.To display the diversity of extinct water creatures.
C.To illustrate the significance of archaeology.
D.To distinguish Qingjiang site from others.
2021-02-21更新 | 98次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般