This debate is related to increasing challenges from rising climatic change, population growth, urbanization(城镇化), and natural resource consumption. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization, food production needs to increase by 60 percent by 2050 in order to feed 9 billion people. Scientists and policymakers are searching for effective ways to gain nutritious food, for today and future. Unlike previous agricultural methods (such as the Green Revolution), GM crops are to fight food safety and poverty challenges.
The great expansion of GM crop varieties over the last two decades can be seen easily. The total area devoted to GM crops has increased 100 times from 1.7 million hectares in 1996 to 170 million hectares in 2012. Developing countries now grow more GM crops than developed countries (in terms of area), largely driven by Brazil’s rapid adoption of GM crops. China is home to about 4 percent of the total global area devoted to GM crops. Beans, corn, and cotton are main global GM crops, while China’s focus is on cotton, papaya, and poplar.
Recently, a scientific study shows that GM crops are safe for people and the environment. According to a 2010 report on the safety of GM crops by the EU, “the main conclusion to be drawn from the efforts of more than 130 research projects, covering a period of more than 25 years of research, and involving more than 500 research groups, is that biology methods, are not more risky than traditional planting technologies, for example.” Other international and national scientific bodies, such as the World Health Organization, have reached the same conclusion.
1. Nowadays, people are developing GM foods mainly to fight against______.
A.urbanization |
B.population growth |
C.rising climatic change |
D.natural resource consumption |
A.Food production. | B.Food nutrition. |
C.Food safety. | D.Food variety. |
A.More GM crops in developing countries. |
B.Less GM crops in developed countries. |
C.Rapid adoption of GM crops in Brazil. |
D.The expansion of GM crop varieties of the world. |
A.traditional planting technologies are more risky |
B.the safety of GM crops has been proved in many ways |
C.the safety of GM crops was reported by the EU in 2010 |
D.present GM crops are safe for people and the environment |
A.Supportive. | B.Opposed. |
C.Unknown. | D.Indifferent. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】It was an autumn day, and I was standing in the kitchen, hanging my head over the counter and trying to figure out how many calories were in a bowl of homemade yogurt and fruit. And I felt annoyed.
I was 16, and my best friend and I had gone to our first Weight Watchers meeting. It was the trend in the mid-1980s, and even though I was an athlete, like many teen girls, I didn't necessarily like what I saw in the mirror. But after a week or so of recording every meal and snack and calculating the calories, I had had enough. I went back to my routine of chewing whatever I wanted, running and skiing, and let that be that. And it's still pretty much what I do;as long as the workouts are regular and the food is whole and balanced, my body's set point hasn't varied for years.
The weight loss trend of three decades ago—full of scales and counting calories—has fallen away. Now fasting (禁食) is popular. The ways to keep fit vary: on the 5:2 diet a person eats for five days and fasts for two days each week, while the 18:6 refers to fasting for 18 hours and then eating within a six-hour window each day.
In this issue, associate editor Mark Barna tries to understand the science behind the fasting plans. Researchers have found that animals like monkeys age more slowly after years of eating less, and in the lab in humans, they saw improvements in a number of signs that indicated the risk of some diseases hard to cure. The hope for healthy weight loss isn't over yet, but at least now the calculators don't have to be on at every meal.
1. What made the author annoyed?A.Her body was not as strong as an athlete's. |
B.There were too many calories in the yogurt and fruit. |
C.The Weight Watchers meeting was not necessary for her. |
D.She had to work out the calories in every meal and snack. |
A.Eating. | B.Doing. | C.Cooking. | D.Choosing. |
A.They limit the calories they take in. | B.They lose weight only. |
C.They fast daily or weekly. | D.They eat enough every day. |
A.People age more slowly if they eat less. | B.People are healthier if they eat less. |
C.People have stopped losing weight now. | D.People calculate the calories of every meal. |
【推荐2】Genetically Modified (GM) food is unfortunately becoming more popular among farmers and food processors. Crops are being genetically modified to resist insects, plant diseases, insecticides(杀虫剂). Plants are also modified to look bigger and better. Unfortunately the end goal isn’t providing nutrition for people, it’s to increase profit margins and to make food look better. In fact many modern fruits and vegetables are twice the size of what they used to be while having far less vitamins, and not tasting good either. Now research is showing that genetically modified food might even be bad for you.
GM organisms are organisms that have genes inserted into their DNA in order to offer certain characteristics. In this way you can make it better, or make it last longer.
Jeffrey M. Smith has published a study about the dangers of GM food. It was discovered that when GM soy was fed to female rats they found that all their young died within 3 weeks compared to a natural 10% death rate. Their young were also born smaller and they later had problems becoming pregnant. A study of pigs found that they also became infertile(不育) after eating GM corn.
Many people are eating GM food without even realizing it. The solution to this problem is simple. Human beings existed in their current form for hundreds of thousands of years. For most of that time we ate a diet consisting of meat, fruit, vegetable, fish, eggs and nuts. This is our optimal diet which leads us to live a healthy and long life. But over the last 30 years North America has experienced diabetes, cancer and heart disease. All due to the misinformation provided by groups who work on behalf of the manufacturers of GM food. The way to avoid obesity, heart disease and cancer is by eating like our stone-age ancestors.
1. According to the author, what ultimately inspired the popularity of GM crops?A.Rich nutrition. | B.Unique taste. |
C.High profits. | D.Energy saving. |
A.Eat more fruit. | B.Be vegetarians. |
C.Eat more grains. | D.Keep traditional diet. |
A.time and events | B.cause and effect |
C.reasoning and argument | D.contrast and comparison |
A.scientists who give out false information because of carelessness |
B.doctors who try to profit from patients who suffer from unhealthy food |
C.workers who try to cheat customers for the benefits of food producers |
D.agricultural technicians who are responsible for promoting new product |
【推荐3】If you really want to go green, here’s good news: eating green is good for you. The very foods with a high carbon cost — meat, pork, dairy products, processed snacks — also tend to be filled with fat and calories. A green diet would be mostly vegetables and fruits, whole grains, fish and lean meats like chicken — a diet that’s eco- and waistline-friendly. Eating green can be healthier and beneficial to the climate.
It may be hard to believe that a meal at McDonald’s produces more carbon than your trip to a far away place. More than 37% of the world’s land is used for agriculture, much of which was once forested. Deforestation (砍伐森林) is a major source of carbon. The fertilizer (化肥) and machinery needed on a modern farm also have a large carbon footprint, as does the network of ships and trucks that brings the food from the farm to your plate.
The most efficient way to reduce the carbon footprint of your menu is to eat less meat, especially beef. Raising cattle takes a lot more energy than growing the equivalent (相等的) amount of grains, fruits or vegetables. What’s more, the majority of cattle in the U.S. are fed on grain and loads of it — 670 million tons in 2002 — and the fertilizer used to feed that creates separate environmental problems.
Focus on eating lower on the food chain, with more plants and fruits and less meat and dairy. It’s simple. We can change today what goes into our bodies for the health of our planet and ourselves.
1. According to the passage, eating green will_____.A.protect the animals from being killed |
B.promote the development of agriculture |
C.help us lose weight and keep self-confidence |
D.be good for our health and make a change for the climate |
A.Deforestation. | B.Fertilizer. |
C.Machinery. | D.Grains. |
A.eat more vegetables than meat |
B.stop raising the cattle |
C.plant more grains |
D.use less fertilizer |
A.The benefits of eating green. |
B.How to reduce the carbon. |
C.The change of our menu. |
D.The ways of keeping healthy. |
【推荐1】Art researchers have found a hidden painting of a man under one of Pablo Picasso’s masterpieces, The Blue Room. By using infrared (红外线的) imagery they discovered that the hidden man under the painting was a man with his face resting on his hand. Now the question that scientists at The Phillips Col-lection hope to answer is simple.Who is he?
The finding of the hidden man in The Blue Room leads to new research about the 1901 painting, which was created by Picasso in Paris at the start of his blue period of unhappiness. Researchers discovered that the hidden man was painted in a reworked composition by Picasso. They are sure that it is not a self-portrait. They think it might be the Paris art dealer Ambrose Villard who hosted Picasso’s first show in 1901, but there’s no record or evidence to prove this, so the research continues.
Hidden pictures have been found under other important Picasso paintings, such as La Vie and Woman Ironing. A technical analysis of La Vie at the Cleveland Museum of Art also found that Picasso reworked the painting’s composition. And scientists found a portrait of a man under Picasso’s painting Woman Ironing at the Guggenheim Museum in Manhattan.
Dorothy Kosinski,director of The Phillips Collection,said more new knowledge about Picasso’s paintings can be discovered through high-tech cooperation among museums. “Our audiences are curious about the high-tech research because it can help them know more about the paintings. It’s giving them a doorway to make them understand Picasso’s paintings more,” she said. “The more we can understand, the greater our appreciation of the paintings will be.”
1. From Paragraph 1, researchers foundA.a man is hiding behind The Blue Room |
B.a painting of a man is hidden under The Blue Room |
C.The Blue Room is one of Pablo Picasso’s masterpieces |
D.a man is taking a rest in The Blue Room of Pablo Picasso |
A.He first showed up in 1901. |
B.He is Ambrose Villard from Paris. |
C.Nobody knows for sure who he is. |
D.He was not painted by Pablo Picasso. |
A.They are painted by Dorothy Kosinski. |
B.They have a hidden picture under them. |
C.They are exhibited at the same museum. |
D.They have a hidden self-portrait in them. |
A.audiences are curious about the doorway of the museums |
B.the research on Picasso’s works can add mystery to him |
C.more people will be crazy about researching Picasso’s life |
D.the high-tech research can help people know more about Picasso’s paintings |
【推荐2】A new concept vehicle, Pod was introduced by Toyota and Sony at the Tokyo motor show. The car is intended as a four-wheeled friend. It aims to provide affection, sympathy and encouragement. Like a dog welcoming its master, the car sits up, wags its tail and acknowledges its owner’s presence using hydraulics(液压装置) and a multi-coloured LED display panel(引擎) across the front.
While on the road, the car constantly monitors the driver’s mood with pulse and sweat sensors on the joystick(操纵杆). Cameras focused on the eyes keep watch for any sigh of drowsiness. If a driver appears to be losing his or her cool, Pod will display warnings, play soft music and blow cold air at the face. Drivers are shaken awake with loud music and a shaking chair.
To improve driving skills, Pod uses a comparison to score drivers, offer advice and rank all Pod owners. Toyota claims that the car will eventually be able to learn its owner’s likes and dislikes by monitoring passenger conversations. If the car hears a favorite song being discussed, it will download the track from the Internet and play it without being asked. It will also recommend restaurants that might suit the driver’s taste and take photographs of passengers when they sound particularly happy.
In keeping with the moodiness that is the car’s main selling point, Pod expresses a form of road anger. If a driver brakes or swerves(急转弯) suddenly, the LED panel shows an angry red and the tail rises at the back.
Anger is one of the car’s ten “emotional states”. Another is sadness — a blue front with tear-shaped lights seemingly dropping from headlights — which appears after a flat tire or when gas is low.
“We wanted to show that the cars can be cheerful and entertaining,” said Yasunori Sakamoto, part of the Toyota design team. Mr Sakamoto said Toyota has no plans to put Pod on the market. Sad, really.
1. The underlined word “drowsiness” in Paragraph 2 means ________.A.fear | B.boredom | C.excitement | D.sleepiness |
A.rank the restaurant nearby | B.recommend a song to passenger |
C.have a conversation with drivers | D.assess the driver's driving skills |
A.Supportive. | B.Doubtful. | C.Pessimistic. | D.Tolerant. |
【推荐3】Scientists have come up with a new way of identifying animals in an area — by testing DNA sucked out of the air. The researchers believe their new method could help scientists keep track of animals that are hard to spot, including endangered animals.
Two teams of scientists — one in Denmark and one in the United Kingdom — came up with the same question at about the same time: Could they identify the animals in an area from DNA that was simply floating in the air?
Testing for eDNA (“environmental” DNA) isn’t a new idea,but most of the time,scientists look for eDNA in water. DNA in the air is usually so small that it would take a microscope to see it. The scientists didn’t have high hopes for their experiment.
Neither team knew that the other group was working on a similar experiment. One collected samples from different locations at Denmark’s Copenhagen Zoo, and the other at Hamerton Zoo Park in the UK. The scientists used slightly different methods to collect their samples. But basically,both teams used vacuums (真空装置) and fans to collect extremely tiny bits of DNA onto very high quality filters (过滤器).
In the laboratory, they got the DNA from the filters and made copies of it to study. By comparing their samples with examples of DNA from different animals, the scientists were able to identify many different animals at the zoos.
The researchers in Denmark identified 49 different kinds of animals. The team in the UK identified 25 different kinds of animals. They even identified DNA from animals that were inside sealed buildings
Each team only discovered the other experiment after they had written a paper about their own results. Instead of competing, the two decided to combine their results and publish a paper together.
Both teams are excited about the ways this new method could be used in the wild. Scientists have been looking for better ways to track endangered animals without interfering with them. If researchers know where animals live, they can do a better job of protecting them. “The next step is to figure out how to take this method into nature,” says Dr. Bohmann.
1. What was the scientists’ attitude towards their experiment initially?A.Hopeful. | B.Skeptical. | C.Disappointed. | D.Satisfied. |
A.They knew each other very well before. |
B.Both of them are from the same country. |
C.Their research methods were not exactly the same. |
D.They identified DNA from nearly 70 kinds of animals in total. |
A.It increases human interaction with wildlife. |
B.It enables the two teams to compete in science. |
C.It could help people escape from dangerous animals. |
D.It could help protect endangered animals in a better way. |
A.A Groundbreaking Way to Test DNA |
B.DNA of Animals in the UK and Denmark |
C.Scientists Identify Animals by DNA in the Air |
D.Two Experimental Teams Doing the Same Thing |
【推荐1】The first people in Canada crossed the Bering Strait from Asia.In the north the Inuit lived by hunting seals,walruses (海象) and whales.They also hunted caribou (北美驯鹿).On the west coast people hunted deer,bear and beaver (河狸).They also fished.On the plains people lived by hunting buffalo.In the east people grew crops of beans,squash (南瓜),maize (玉米) and sunflower seeds.
The first Europeans to reach Canada were the Vikings.In 986 a Viking called Bjarni Herjolfsson was blown off course by a storm and he spotted a new land.However he sailed away without landing.In 1001 a man named Leif Eriksson landed in the new land,which he named Vinland (it was part of Canada).However Eriksson did not stay permanently.Later the Vikings did establish a colony (殖民地) in North America but they abandoned it because of conflict with the natives.
However,after the Vikings,Canada was forgotten until the end of the 15th century.In 1497 the English King Henry Ⅶ sent an Italian named John Cabot on an expedition across the Atlantic to Newfoundland.Cabot discovered rich fishing waters off the coast of Canada.
Then in 1534 and in 1535-1536 a Frenchman named Jacques Cartier (1491-1557) sailed on two expeditions to Canada.On 10 August 1535 (St Lawrence's Day) he sailed into the St Lawrence River,which he named after the saint.
However no permanent European settlements were made in Canada until the early 17th century.In 1603 a Frenchman named Samuel de Champlain (1567-1635) sailed up the St Lawrence River.In 1604 he founded Port Royal in Acadia (Nova Scotia).In 1608 Samuel de Champlain founded Quebec.(The name Quebec is believed to be an Algonquin word meaning a narrow part of a river).In 1642 the French founded Montreal.The new colony in Canada was called New France.By 1685 the population of New France was about 10,000.By 1740 it was 48,000.
1. Who was the first European to reach Canada?A.Leif Eriksson. | B.Bjarni Herjolfsson. |
C.John Cabot. | D.Samuel de Champlain. |
A.Europeans set foot on Canada. |
B.Europeans started expeditions. |
C.Europeans fought against the natives. |
D.Europeans began to make permanent settlements. |
A.The early history of Canada |
B.The languages of Canada |
C.Europeans started expeditions |
D.The war between Europeans and Canadians |
A.In the north. | B.In the east. |
C.On the west coast. | D.On the plains. |
【推荐2】In a strawberry field surrounded by strawberry fields on the outskirts of Santa Maria, a pair of robots have been picking berries all summer.
Each robot, made by a Colorado company called Tortuga AgTech, rolls in the field on wheels, then stops in front of a plant. A mechanical arm operates its sensor among the leaves; machine vision software scans the sensor data in search of ripe berries. If an unripe berry is in the way, the robot repositions for a better angle. A nipper-grabber (夹爪) mounted in the middle of the sensors stretches to cut the berry’s stem (茎), and then cautiously places it in a waiting plastic container at the robot’s base.
Tortuga’s robots are designed to pick strawberries from plants grown on hydroponic (水培的) tabletops, not the ground strawberries. The tabletop system enables Tortuga’s strawberry robots to work by making berries easier to be poked up with robotic arms and protecting the robots from direct exposure to the elements.
Since hitting this field last spring, the robots are on their way to picking nearly as many berries as human pickers, and with 95% accuracy, according to Tortuga. Unlike a human, the Tortuga robots don’t need breaks, can’t get sick, are always ready to work and can pick all day and into the night. With wages making up so much of a grower’s expense, the allure of robots increased reliability and potential to become more cost-efficient over time is hard to resist.
I do think the best humans are going to be able to outperform robots at these judgment-driven tasks,” said Eric Adamson, Tortuga’s cofounder and chief executive. “But that’s OK. It doesn’t have to be better than every human; it just has to be better than enough people.”
Meanwhile, the team behind Tortuga sees agricultural robots as more than labor-saving devices. They see them as the only way that an industry facing climate change, land use and chemical regulation can adapt and survive.
1. How can the robot detect ripe strawberries?A.By analyzing the sensor data. | B.By observing their positions. |
C.By monitoring their stems. | D.By testing them in containers. |
A.Add some relevant information. | B.Provide some advice for growers. |
C.Summarize the previous paragraphs. | D.Introduce a new topic for discussion. |
A.Pressure. | B.Appeal. | C.Impact. | D.Expansion. |
A.Robots replacing human labor. |
B.Urgent need for agricultural robots. |
C.Robots shaping the future of strawberry. |
D.Great challenges of future robots. |
【推荐3】Do you forget to turn off the lights and heaters when you go out of a room? In 2040 it will not matter. They will turn themselves off--and on again when you return. You will choose the temperature for each room, the lighting and the humidity. A sensor will find the presence of a human (and, with luck, ignore the dog!) and turn the systems on, and when the humans leave it will turn them off again.
The sensors will work through the central home computer, and they will do much more than just turn the fires and lights on and off for you. They will find faulty electrical appliances, plugs or switches, separate them so that they cannot harm anyone, and then warn you that they need repair. They will detect fire and if you are out of the house, the computer will call the fire station. It will not be too difficult because the locks on the outside doors will be electronic. You will open them using your personal card--the one you use for shopping--maybe using a number known only to you.
It will be impossible to lose the key, and a housebreaker will have to tamper (拨弄) with the lock or with a window. It is not very difficult to make such tampering send a signal to the computer.
The computer will be more than a fireman-policeman-servant. It will be an entertainer, and most of your entertainment will come right into your home. It does now, of course, but by 2040 “entertainment” will mean much more. For one thing, you will be able to take part actively, rather than just watching.
1. Which of the following statements is NOT true?A.The sensor is multi-functional. |
B.Without a computer, the sensor cannot do much. |
C.The sensor will detect fire and make an emergency call. |
D.You can be considered an intruder if you tamper with the lock or with a window. |
A.will free us from the keys we use today | B.will turn everything into sensors |
C.Will make the locks out of date | D.will get rid of all crimes |
A.will have no entertainment outside | B.will replace TV with computers |
C.will be controlled by computers | D.will have more fun at home |
A.Sensors and Computers |
B.Life at Home in the Year 2040 |
C.The Development of Science and Technology |
D.Lights and Heaters in the Year 2040 |