组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自我 > 日常活动 > 日常生活
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:130 题号:7302917

A Common Habit Leads to Shocking Harm

Crossing your legs is an extremely common habit; most people don’t even notice that they’re doing it when they sit down. While you may find it comfortable to sit with one knee crossed over the other, it might be causing health problems that you are not aware of.

A study published in Blood Pressure Monitoring stated that sitting with your legs crossed can increase your blood pressure. The reason this happens is because the blood in your legs has to work against gravity to be pumped back to your heart, crossing one leg over the other increases resistance, making it even harder for the blood to circulate. This causes your body to increase your blood pressure to push the blood back to the heart. You won’t feel any immediate effects, but if you sit for long periods of time it’s important that you take note of how long you have your legs crossed for. You shouldn’t have your legs crossed for more than 15 minutes, and it’s important that you get up and walk around at least once every hour.

Crossing your legs can also lead to neck and back pain. Ideally, it’s best for our bodies to sit with our feet planted flat, hip width apart, on the floor, but it’s not easy to maintain perfect posture all day at the office. When you sit with your legs crossed your hips are in a twisted position, which can cause one of your pelvic bones to rotate. Since your pelvic bone supports your neck and spine, this can cause pressure on your lower and middle back and neck.

You also might notice that when you sit with your legs crossed for long periods of time your feet and legs get tingly or have the feeling of being asleep. This is because when one leg sits on top of the other it causes pressure on the veins and nerves in your legs and feet. It can cause numbness or temporary paralysis in the legs, ankles, or feet. While the feeling of discomfort may only last a minute or two, repeatedly crossing your legs until they feel numb can cause permanent nerve damage.

So next time you sit down, try to get yourself in the habit of sitting with both of your feet on the floor. Not only will it help your posture and stability, but it will also save your health in the long run.

1. According to the passage, which is not the problem caused by sitting with your legs crossed?
A.Increase blood pressure
B.Cause neck and back pain
C.Lead to numbness or temporary paralysis
D.Keep in a twisted position
2. What’s the best explanation of the underlined word “circulate”?
A.Go straight
B.Move around
C.Fall down
D.Work against gravity
3. Which of the following statement is true?
A.Once you cross your legs while sitting, you’ll feel immediate effects.
B.The numbness in the legs ,ankles or feet won’t cause permanent nerve damage.
C.The perfect posture for sitting is to sit with your feet planted flat and hip width apart.
D.As long as you cross your legs for less than 15 minutes, it won’t do harm to your health.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐1】For a long time in history,numerous scholars have asked the question:what is beauty?As designers update the latest fashions and artists create their masterpieces,what is considered beautiful changes at an alarming pace.Fifty years ago,the full-figured American actress Marilyn Monroe was a symbol of the American aesthetic(美学的)value; today,many Hollywood actresses different in appearance from Marilyns have taken her taken per place.However, aesthetic values not only differ from generation to generation,but do so along cultural lines as well.Often,what is   considered hating one civilization is just the aesthetic appeal in another.Thus it is difficult to give an absolute definition of beauty.

As fundamental physicists,my colleagues and I like to believe that we are involved in a search for a beauty that affects definition.The beauty that we search for is not what is set up through the work of people and subject to the tastes,but rather what has been laid down by nature Physics allows its students to look past outer appearance,into a deeper beauty.As a human being,I am attracted by the visual appeal of a wave crashing on the beach.As a physicist, however I am able to see the deeper beauty of the physical laws that govern such a phenomenon.

In truth,since Albert Einstein put forward the idea that there might be one main physical theory that governs the universe,aesthetics,have become a driving force in modern physics.Einstein and other later physicists have discovered that:Nature,as its most fundamental level,is beautifully constructed.The extraordinary simplicity of the laws that govern the universes is really breathtaking.As Einstein said, it would seem more likely that we should find ourselves living in a "disorderly world,in no way apprehensible through thinking".Yet we are now closer than ever to a full understanding of the universe's beautiful clockwork.As new discoveries and technologies allow us to examine the physical world on deeper and deeper levels, we find that the beauty itself becomes much deeper.

1. The reference to" Marilyn Monroe" in paragraph 2 mainly serves to      .
A.show there is no fixed definition of aesthetics
B.provide an example of today's beauty standards
C.compare traditions of the East to the west
D.discuss her abilities as an actress
2. When appreciating a wave crashing on the beach,a physicist sees the beauty of      .
A.the visual attractionB.the powerful sounds
C.the lovely creaturesD.the physical laws behind
3. Why are Albert Einstein's words mentioned in paragraph 3 ?
A.To detail the functions of physical laws.
B.To highlight the range of Einstein's influence.
C.To stress the very simplicity of the laws of the universe
D.To show that Einstein doubted the beauty of physics.
4. the passage is mainly to      .
A.emphasize the influence of physics
B.present a special way of seeing beauty
C.discuss the awareness of across-culture
D.argue the traditional ideas on value
2017-05-10更新 | 127次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐2】“Sugar, alcohol and tobacco,” economist Adam Smith once wrote, “are commodities which are necessaries of life, which have become objects of almost universal consumption, and which are, therefore, extremely popular subjects of taxation.”

Two and a half centuries on, most countries impose sort of tax on alcohol and tobacco. With obesity levels putting increasing pressure on public health systems, governments around the world have begun to toy with the idea of taxing sugar as well.

Whether such taxes work is a matter of debate. A review of Mexico’s taxation found a fall in purchases of taxed drinks as well as a rise in sales of untaxed and healthier drinks. By contrast, a Danish tax on foods high in fats was abandoned a year after its introduction, during claims that consumers were avoiding it by crossing the border to Germany to satisfy their desire for cheaper, fattier foods.

The food industry has, in general, been firmly opposed to such direct government action. Nonetheless, the renewed focus on waistlines means that industry groups are under pressure to demonstrate their products are healthy as well as tasty.

Over the past three decades, the industry has made some efforts to improve the quality of its offerings. For example, some drink manufactures have cut the amount of sugar in their beverages.

Many of the reductions over the past 30 years have been achieved either by reducing the amount of sugar, salt or fat in a product, or by finding an alternative ingredient. More recently, however, some companies have been investing money in a more ambitious undertaking: learning how to adjust the fundamental make-up of the food they sell. For example, having salt on the outside, but none on the inside, reduces the salt content without changing the taste.

While reformulating recipes is one way to improve public health, it should be part of a multisided approach. The key is to remember that there is not just one solution. To deal with obesity, a mixture of approaches-including reformulation, taxation and adjusting portion sizes-will be needed. There is no silver bullet.

1. According to Adam Smith, sugar, alcohol and tobacco were       .
A.profitable to manufacture
B.in ever-increasing demand
C.no longer considered necessities of life
D.subjects of taxation almost everywhere
2. What do we learn about Danish taxation on fat-rich foods?
A.It brought a lot of problems on the border.
B.It did not work out as well as it was expected.
C.It could not succeed without German cooperation.
D.It met with firm opposition from the food industry.
3. What does the underlined part “silver bullet” in the last paragraph mean?
A.A successful but complex solution.
B.An effective and hopeful solution.
C.A single easy quick way.
D.A long way.
4. What’s the main idea of the passage?
A.Efforts to make sugar healthy and tasty.
B.Approaches to adapting to consumers’ needs.
C.Different ways to cope with health problems.
D.Government taxation on sugar, alcohol and tobacco.
2017-12-07更新 | 84次组卷
阅读理解-六选四(约300词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是说明文。文章阐述自动驾驶技术的伦理问题,文章还讲述了一个网站收集的公众对此问题的观点。

【推荐3】A selection from the trolley

The trolley problem used to be a popular question in philosophical ethics(伦理学).It runs as follows: a trolley, or a train, is speeding down a track towards a junction(三叉路口). Some evildoer has tied five people to the track ahead, and another person to the branch line. You are standing next to a lever(操纵杆) that controls the junction. Do nothing, and the five people will be killed. Pull the lever, and only one person dies. What is the ethical course of action?

    1     A truly self-driving car, after all, will have to be given ethical instructions of some sort by its human programmers. That has led to a boom for the world’s professional ethicists, who suddenly find themselves in hot demand.

In a paper just published in Nature, a team of psychologists and computer scientists, led by Edmond Awad of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), describe a different approach.     2    

They created a website which presents visitors with a series of choices about whom to save and whom to kill. The website proved a hit. In the end it gathered nearly 40m decisions.

The strongest preferences, expressed by respondents from all over the world, were for saving human lives over animal ones, preferring to save many rather than few and prioritising children over the old.     3    

Iyad Rahwan, a computer scientist at MIT and one of the paper’s authors, says that many people dismiss the trolley problem as pointless as it is unlikely to arise in real life. He is unconvinced. The specific situations described by the website may hardly ever occur, he says.     4     He gives the example of overtaking cyclists: “If you stay relatively near to the cycle lane, you’re increasing the chance of hitting a cyclist, but reducing the chance of hitting another car in the next lane over,” he says.

A.But all sorts of choices made by the firms producing self-driving cars will affect who lives and who dies in indirect ways.
B.Rather than asking philosophers for their thoughts, they decided instead to ask the public.
C.That seems to conflict with most people’s moral preferences.
D.The preference for saving women, for instance, was stronger in places with higher levels of gender equality.
E.There were weaker preferences for saving women over men, pedestrians over passengers in the car and for taking action rather than doing nothing.
F.The excitement around self-driving cars, though, has made the problem famous.
2022-09-29更新 | 369次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般