1 . Twenty-five years ago, I was a fairly new school administrator. I was
As Armstrong sees it, joy
Throughout my years as a school administrator, I’ve held fast to Armstrong’s
A.admired | B.acknowledged | C.inspired | D.advertised |
A.In terms of | B.With regard to | C.Apart from | D.Instead of |
A.refreshing | B.widespread | C.conventional | D.unpredictable |
A.talent | B.definition | C.example | D.standard |
A.explained | B.challenged | C.proved | D.fueled |
A.introducing | B.sharpening | C.assessing | D.exchanging |
A.primary | B.normal | C.cultural | D.flexible |
A.tested | B.supported | C.reserved | D.practised |
A.values | B.sense | C.origin | D.scenes |
A.approach | B.belief | C.promise | D.story |
A.learn | B.translate | C.add | D.investigate |
A.move on | B.put off | C.stand by | D.hold back |
A.conveyed | B.illustrated | C.polished | D.felt |
A.writers | B.parents | C.educators | D.pioneers |
A.skillfully | B.importantly | C.positively | D.surprisingly |
2 . Here’s something that’s surprisingly common: people who strongly advocate moral or noble ideals, but regularly use them to justify attacking and mistreating others — something which is surely neither moral nor noble.
Isn’t this inconsistent? How can someone loudly insist they’re a good person while behaving in ways that totally contradict this, without mentally short-circuiting in some way?
The answer is that there are many psychological and neurological (神经的) processes that allow people to engage in this behaviour that, for want of a better label, we’ll call ‘virtue bullying’.
A lot of virtue bullying could be seen as virtual bullying, which is to say it’s a lot easier online. We’ve all seen Facebook posts that make some simple, morally solid claim, such as “I support victims of [the latest disaster]”, which are then followed by something like “Share if you agree. I bet 97 per cent of you won’t.” Such posts are basically saying, “I’m a good, moral person ... and I’ll criticise you until you agree.” This isn’t the behaviour of a good person.
But it’s not internet-specific. Wanting to protect children is a good, moral aim, but consider all the books and shows banned or attacked in the US under the cover of protecting children. Indeed, throughout history, there have been many instances where individuals who considered themselves good and moral have committed terrible acts.
But why do good people treat others badly? Our brains work hard to enhance our self-esteem (自尊). A 2011 study found that an effective way to strengthen our self-esteem is to attack others, so our status (地位) becomes relatively higher. So, thinking you’re good while attacking others can be a very instinctive (本能的) process, sadly.
For humans, our morals are a key aspect of our identity and an important factor in our decision-making. We’re naturally protective of our identities and decision-making. If these things are rooted in morals and beliefs, we’ll be defensive towards anyone who poses a threat to them. This can lead to what seems to be inconsistent behaviours.
Ultimately, for all the explanations offered here, it should be acknowledged that some people are just not nice. How you deal with such people is up to you.
1. Why does the author raise questions in paragraph 2?A.To express his doubts. | B.To present an assumption. |
C.To display a phenomenon. | D.To introduce points for discussion. |
A.Advocating for noble causes online. |
B.Using moral ideals to justify mistreating others. |
C.Forcing others to agree with one’s moral claims. |
D.Attacking people who disagree with one’s moral beliefs. |
A.Attacking others boosts self-esteem. |
B.Self-esteem is linked with social status. |
C.People with higher social status attack others more often. |
D.Boosting self-esteem reduces the desire to attack others. |
A.Morals vary with them. | B.Morals threaten them. |
C.Morals shape them. | D.Morals assess them. |
3 . Are you an open book, your face broadcasting every passing emotion, or more of a poker face, not showing what you are feeling? Scientists at Nottingham Trent University say that wearing your heart on your face, could actually give you a significant social advantage.
The study, led by Eithne Kavanagh, a research fellow at NTU’s School of Social Sciences, involving over 1,300 participants, noticed striking variations in how much people moved their faces during conversations. Importantly, this expressiveness emerged as a stable individual quality. People displayed similar levels of facial expressiveness across different contexts, with different social partners, and even over time periods up to four months.
The researchers say that facial expressiveness is linked to personality, with more agreeable individuals displaying more lively faces. Facial expressiveness can also translate into concrete social benefits. In a negotiation task, more expressive individuals are more likely to secure a larger slice of a reward. The researchers suggest that for agreeable folks, dynamic facial expressions may serve as a tool for building good relationship and smoothing over conflicts. Across the board, the results point to facial expressiveness serving an“ affiliative (亲和) function,” or a social glue that develops liking and smoother interactions.
Expressiveness is also linked to being seen as more “readable,” suggesting that a lively face makes one’s intentions and mental states easier for others to decipher. Beyond frequency of facial movements, people who employ facial expressions more strategically to suit social goals, such as looking friendly in a greeting, are also more well- liked.
The findings challenge the “poker face” common belief that a still and unemotional appearance is always most advantageous. Instead, they suggest that for most people, allowing one’s face to mirror inner states and intentions can invite warmer reactions. As the researchers conclude, “Being facially expressive is socially advantageous.” So, the next time you catch yourself making lines on your forehead, or flashing a smile, know that your face just might be working overtime on your behalf.
1. What does Paragraph 2 mainly talk about concerning the study?A.Its impact. | B.Its findings. | C.Its limitations. | D.Its significance. |
A.A way to frighten competitors. |
B.A method to hide personalities. |
C.A tool to show personal quality. |
D.A strategy to settle disagreement. |
A.Copy. | B.Overlook. | C.Remember | D.Interpret. |
A.Always wearing a still face. | B.Learning to be an open book. |
C.Speaking out inner emotions. | D.Forcing a smile through tears. |
After a busy week, Lucy and her parents planned a mountain picnic to appreciate the beauty of nature and spend some quality time together. Little did they know, their trip was going to have some surprises.
Upon reaching the mountain’s foot, they came across a house where Jack and his dad were securing a boat onto their truck. Lucy, curious about the best picnic spot, approached them for advice. Jack, familiar with the mountain, recommended a spot about a two-hour hike away.“ It’s truly a sight to pay attention to,” he promised.
They parked next to Jack’s truck, gathered their picnic supplies, and set foot on the scenic path. Thick trees lined one side of the road, while a gentle stream flowed on the other, guiding them to an impressive grassland
As they were wrapping up their meal and looking forward
The rain finally stopped, and it felt as if they had been waiting for a century. Lucy and her parents quickly packed up, eager to head back. Their relief didn’t last; the stream had grown into a huge, rushing flood, blocking their way. With no cell phone signal, they were cut off from the outside world. Adding to their dilemma, night was fast approaching, casting a shadow over their situation.
Despite the challenges, they gathered close together, using the tent as a temporary shelter against the approaching darkness. As they sat there, they realized that this unexpected event had brought them even closer as a family, turning a simple picnic into a memorable adventure they would never forget.
注意:1.续写词数应为150左右;
2. 请按如下格式在答题卡的相应位置作答。
Suddenly, they heard a truck noise coming from the other side of the river.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Lucy and her parents got on Jack’s boat and crossed the river safely.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________5 . Light is a vital part of life and without it plants would not grow or produce oxygen that people need to breathe. But light, it turns out, does so much more. Light therapy (治疗) appears to improve healing in the brains of people who suffered significant brain injuries, according to a study published in Radiology.
This recent study is one of the more influential studies that have been done in the light therapy field. It was a double- blind study. Neither the participants nor the researchers were aware of who received the treatment and who received a placebo (安慰剂).
Researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) gathered 38 patients who had suffered moderate brain injuries. 17 of the patients received light therapy through a helm et (头盔) that gives off near- infrared light within 72 hours of their injury, while 21 of the patients wore the helmet without any light being given off.
The researchers then used medical images to view the patients’ brain in its resting state. What they found is that the patients who received the treatment had more changes in their brain connectivity. The regions in their brains that showed more connectivity included ones related to sensory processing, cognitive function, and motor control.
All of this seems like very good news. And yet, strangely enough, the researchers found that the light treatment had no long- term effect on the patients. “We were unable to detect differences in connectivity between the two treatment groups in the long term, so although the treatment appears to increase the brain connectivity initially, its long- term effects are still to be determined,” Dr. Nathaniel Mercardo, a statistician at MGH and a co- author of the study said in the news release.
Still, as PsyPost point s out, even though the study is not 100 percent conclusive. in terms of the benefits of light therapy in the long term, it is a good start. More research obviously needs to be done to determine whether this potentially life- changing treatment can stand up well to closer inspection.
1. What do we know about the study?A.It explained the importance of light in life. |
B.All participants received the same treatment. |
C.It explored the potential of light therapy. |
D.The researchers were familiar with the participants. |
A.The advanced medical image technology. |
B.The increased connections within the brain. |
C.The rare se |
D.The differences of participants’ nature. |
A.To confirm the reliability of the result. |
B.To comment the significance of the treatment. |
C.To highlight his contribution to the statistics analysis. |
D.To explain the long- term effect of the treatment is not fully known. |
A.Skeptical. | B.Objective. | C.Critical. | D.Subjective. |
The Duan inkstone,
The stones
The procedure to make a Duan Inkstone includes four steps: stone picking, selection, carving and box matching, among
Throughout history, Duan inkstone has been
7 . One inconvenient truth for the clean energy industry is the undeniable fact that wind turbines (涡轮机) kill birds. Researchers say smarter turbines could dramatically cut the toll.
The American Bird Conservancy claims that at least one million bird deaths as a result of wind turbines a year in the US alone is likely to be an underestimate. That’s substantially less than the estimated 980 million birds a year that die crashing into buildings, or the 1.4 to 3.7 billion per year killed by domestic cats. But it’s still an unacceptable number, and a problem that needs to be addressed— because a fully green energy network will need more and more turbines over the coming decades.
Researchers at SINTEF and the Norwegian Centre believe they have an idea that could help in a lot of cases. The idea — known as SKARV— is fairly simple: each turbine will have cameras fitted, capable of spotting birds flying directly into the path of the rotors (螺旋桨). Software will automatically calculate their predicted path, and if it looks like they’re in danger of being hit, the system will send control signals to slow the rotors down.
In simulations (模拟), the system is able to avoid the vast majority of crashes. This, of course, doesn’t describe all situations. For example, if a young, inexperienced bird approaches a turbine displaying irregular flight behavior, it will not be possible to predict exactly where it will be a few seconds later. Prediction is also more difficult if several birds approach at the same time.
Some researchers argue that birds are learning to avoid turbines voluntarily. But if more than a million birds a year haven’t got the memo yet, it’s still a problem worth solving. We look forward to hearing how trials progress.
1. What does the underlined phrase “cut the toll” in paragraph I probably mean?A.Maximize efficiency. | B.Reduce deaths. |
C.Lower costs. | D.Prevent errors. |
A.It tops the list of bird deaths. | B.It calls for immediate action. |
C.It has been properly solved. | D.It shows progress in technology. |
A.By keeping a constant speed. | B.By recording birds’ behavior. |
C.By predicting potential danger. | D.By sending warnings to birds. |
A.Challenges presented in simulations. | B.Features of birds’ flying patterns. |
C.Examples of SKARV’s application | D.Approaches to crash avoidance. |
1. How old is the speaker now?
A.12 years old. | B.15 years old. | C.17 years old. |
A.She had to study. | B.She had watched the movie. | C.She had to see another friend. |
A.They hardly see each other. |
B.They remain to be good friends. |
C.They have fewer friends. |
1. How many aspects (方面) of the United Kingdom does the man refer to?
A.Two. | B.Three. | C.Four. |
A.Windsor Castle. | B.The Tower of London. | C.The National Gallery. |
A.James Bond | B.Star Wars. | C.Harry Potter. |
A.Badminton. | B.Basketball. | C.Golf |
10 . Top-down processing is the process of using context or general knowledge to understand what we perceive (感知). In 1970, psychologist Richard Gregory introduced the concept. He claimed that perception is constructive.
The processing plays an important role in our interactions with our environment. Our five senses are constantly taking in information. At any given time, we are experiencing different sights, sounds, tastes, smells, and ways things feel when we touch them. If we paid attention to each one of our senses all the time, we’d never do anything else. It enables us to simplify the process by relying on context and our pre-existing knowledge to understand what we notice. If our brains didn’t employ top-down processing our senses would overwhelm us.
Top-down processing helps us understand what our senses are perceiving in our daily lives. For example, suppose you receive an important letter but a few drops of water have ruined part of the text. A few letters in different words are now just smudges (污迹). Yet, you’re still able to read the letter in its entirety using top-down processing. You use the context of the words and sentences in which the smudges appear and your knowledge of reading to comprehend the meaning of the letter’s message. See a word LO*E, with one letter knocked down, yet you are still able to quickly recognize the word as LOVE.
On the one hand, top-down processing serves a positive function by simplifying the way we comprehend our sensory perceptions. It enables us to shortcut the cognitive path between our perceptions and their meaning. On the other hand, patterns can also prevent us from perceiving things in unique ways. So we may understand the pattern of how to use a mobile phone, but if the manufacturer comes out with a new phone that employs completely unique interaction patterns, we may not be able to figure out how to use it. Besides, as our knowledge is limited and biased (片面的) in certain ways, it can lead to perceptual errors.
1. What is the author’s purpose in writing paragraph 2?A.To explain main reasons. | B.To give practical examples. |
C.To draw specific conclusions. | D.To analyse theoretical frameworks. |
A.Pre-existing knowledge. | B.Active interactions. |
C.Five physical senses. | D.Lessons from mistakes |
A.Seeing is believing. | B.Practice makes perfect. |
C.Every coin has two sides. | D.Experience is the best teacher. |
A.Introduce a reading method. | B.Deepen underlying meanings. |
C.Illustrate a cognitive strategy. | D.Clarify a producing process. |