A.The weather. | B.Driving lessons. | C.The man’s work. |
1. How does the speaker think about rainy days as a child?
A.Excited. | B.Bored. | C.Indifferent. |
A.He didn’t have any brothers or sisters. |
B.He was often left alone at home. |
C.He preferred reading to playing outside. |
A.Lying on the sand. | B.Watching TV. | C.Walking on the beach. |
A.It makes the weather cooler. |
B.He knows it won’t last long. |
C.He doesn’t have any summer holidays any longer. |
3 . For nearly as long as the modern computer has existed, it has been used to forecast the weather. First used during World War II to simulate (模拟) nuclear weapons, computers were soon adopted to simulate the future state of the atmosphere, creating the modern discipline of weather prediction. Although that discipline has grown ever more complicated and now produces reliable forecasts several weeks in advance, its approach remains the same: using large amounts of calculating power to solve equations (方程).
Over the past year, artificial intelligence (AI) has begun to change that. Tech companies including Google and Nvidia have trained AI models to predict the weather up to 10 days in advance, with an accuracy equaling or even topping traditional models — and with far less calculation overhead. Rather than solving equations, these AI models predict the near future based on patterns learned through training on 40 years of past weather, which is recorded by the traditional model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), the world’s top weather agency. Once trained, the AI models can work out a forecast on a computer in 1 minute rather than taking 2 hours to run on a supercomputer.
ECMWF has already begun to produce its own AI forecast, and other weather agencies are eager to catch up. The new models aren’t perfect. They struggle to predict certain essential features—hurricane intensity, for example. But AI forecasters will only improve as they begin to learn from direct weather observations collected by sensors, not just data already passed through existing models. Besides, their speed could allow agencies to run them over and over, as they capture in the atmosphere the full spread of uncertainty, be it necessary or unnecessary for weather prediction.
No one expects traditional weather prediction to disappear. Another branch, climate models, an extension of weather forecasting, for example, rely on equation solving just as traditional weather models do. But in the long term, the output of climate models may itself become training data for a climate forecasting AI, which might ultimately do a better job than the traditional models.
1. How do AI models predict weather?A.By running on a supercomputer. | B.By recording traditional models. |
C.By working on the existing data. | D.By making massive calculations. |
A.They may be overly operated. | B.They may be slow to respond. |
C.They may confuse natural disasters. | D.They may bring unfair competitions. |
A.They lack accurate data. | B.They need intensive training. |
C.They work in a traditional way. | D.They determine weather forecasting. |
A.How Can AI Aid Atmosphere Study? |
B.Should We Trust AI to Predict Hurricanes? |
C.Weather Forecast Is Having an AI Moment |
D.Tech Giants Are Competing in Data Collection |
4 . Joshua trees — some of the most unusual and famous plants of the American Southwest — have survived as a species for some 2.5 million years in the Mojave Desert. Now, they may face extinction due to climate change.
In a new study published in the journal Ecosphere, researchers and volunteer scientists surveyed nearly 4,000 trees in southern California’s Joshua Tree National Park to figure out where the oldest trees grew the best during historic periods of extreme heat and drought. Then, the researchers estimated (估算) how many of these Joshua safe areas would survive to the end of the century based on a range of climate change predictions.
The study authors found that if greenhouse gas emissions (排放物) are seriously limited and summer temperatures are limited to an increase of 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, about 19% of the park’s Joshua tree habitat (栖息地) would survive after the year 2070. If no action is taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and summer temperatures rise by 9 degrees Fahrenheit or more, however, only 0.02% of the tree’s habitat would survive to the end of the century, leaving the tree close to extinction.
One way to save the Joshua trees from extinction is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, even if the habitats survive, these trees will still be in danger because of wildfires, which have also been happening more often as the climate warms. According to the researchers, fewer than 10% of Joshua trees survive when wildfires rush through their habitats.
“Removing grass is a way park rangers (护林员) are helping to protect the area from fire today,” Sweet, a plant ecologist at the University of California, said. “By protecting the trees, they’re protecting a host of other native insects and animals that depend on them as well.”
1. Why did the researchers survey some Joshua trees?A.To predict the number of Joshua trees. |
B.To know their past and predict their future. |
C.To make sure they will be safe from disasters. |
D.To set up more nature reserves for Joshua trees. |
A.Their future is in humans’ hand. |
B.Their numbers are dropping greatly. |
C.They may adapt to rising temperatures. |
D.They are suffering most from climate change. |
A.Another way to save Joshua trees. |
B.Another threat Joshua trees may face. |
C.The importance of Joshua trees’ habitats. |
D.The chance of fire happening to Joshua trees. |
A.Skilled. | B.Challenging. |
C.Creative. | D.Worthwhile. |
5 . Germany’s top court (法院) has ruled that parts of the country’s 2019 climate action law must be changed because they don’t do a good job of protecting young people. Nine young people aged 15 to 24 took the government to court over the law. They said that the government’s failure to plan carefully was putting their future lives in danger.
The judges (法官) of Germany’s highest court said climate change will influence young people far more than adults. That’s because climate change will become more serious over time. As young people become adults, they’ll be left to deal with any problems that today’s adults don’t deal with.
In 2019, Germany passed a new law, promising that the country would be producing no more CO2 than the forest can take in by 2050. The law made a plan of action until 2030. But the law didn’t have any plans for climate actions that would be taken between 2031 and 2050.
The court has asked the German government to fix the law by the end of 2022. The climate law will now need to have a plan for the actions that will be taken after 2030.
The German government has said that it will quickly begin working to make the needed changes. One important part of high court decisions like this is that they act as guides or examples for future decisions. This means that in the future, Germany’s lawmakers will be more likely to think about the climate future of young people as they create their laws.
1. Why did the judges make such a decision?A.They decided the new law made no sense. |
B.They wanted to give the young more rights. |
C.They focused more on the future of the young. |
D.They thought it’s hard to solve climate change. |
A.It failed to take action before 2030. |
B.It was producing more and more CO2. |
C.It refused to consider the young’s rights. |
D.It didn’t plan the climate actions after 2030. |
A.It will make more decisions on climate change. |
B.It will ask the young to help make climate laws. |
C.It will consider the young when making climate laws. |
D.It will encourage the young to protect the environment. |
A.They were brave and forward-looking enough. |
B.They couldn’t bear the present climate change. |
C.They wanted to take part in law-making. |
D.They planned to work in the government. |
1. What’s the weather like now?
A.Sunny. | B.Rainy. | C.Windy. |
A.Watch movies. | B.Play cards. | C.Play badminton. |
1. Which season is it now?
A.Summer. | B.Fall. | C.Winter. |
A.The northeast coast. | B.The northwest coast. | C.The southwest coast. |
A.Rain. | B.Snow | C.Wind. |
A.In the west of Ireland. |
B.In the north of Scotland. |
C.In the south of America. |
8 . Amphibians are animals that can live both on land and in water. A new global assessment has found that 41% of amphibian species that scientists have studied are threatened with extinction. That’s up from 39% reported in the last assessment in 2004.
The study, published on Wednesday in the journal Nature, found that the loss of habitat from the legal and illegal expansion of farming and ranching (放牧) contributes most to the extinction risk of amphibians worldwide. But a growing percentage of amphibian species are now also pushed to the edge of extinction by novel diseases and climate change, the study found.
Amphibians have distinct life stages that each often require separate habitats, so they can be disturbed by changes in either water or land environments, said University of Texas biologist Michael Ryan, who was not involved in the study. They are also at risk because of their delicate skin. Most amphibians absorb oxygen to breathe through their skin, and so they do not have scales (鳞), feathers or fur to protect them. Chemical pollution, bacteria and fungal (真菌的) infections impact them quickly, as do heightened swings in temperature and dampness levels due to climate change.
For example, frogs are active usually at night. If it’s too hot, they won’t come out even at night because they would lose too much water through their skin, said co-author and researcher Patricia Burrowes. But remaining in sheltered resting places limits frogs’ ability to eat and to produce.
Juan Manuel Guayasamin, a frog biologist at the University San Francisco of Quito, Ecuador, said that advances in technology to track animals and climate variations allowed the new study to use much more precise data than the 2004 assessment. “We have a much better understanding of some risks,” said Guayasamin.
The study identified the greatest concentrations of threatened amphibian species in several biodiversity hot spots, including the Caribbean islands, the tropical Andes, Madagascar and Sri Lanka. Other locations with large numbers of threatened amphibians include Brazil’s Atlantic Forest, southern China and the southeastern United States.
1. What has the new study found?A.Amphibian populations are now extinct. |
B.The number of amphibians is rising slightly. |
C.The extinction risk of amphibians has declined. |
D.More amphibian species are endangered than before. |
A.Habitat loss. | B.Illegal hunting. | C.Novel diseases. | D.Climate change. |
A.The unusual living habits of frogs. | B.The unique features of the frog skin. |
C.The effect of climate change on amphibians. | D.The urgency of protecting amphibians’ habitats. |
A.Its methods are debatable. | B.Its findings are more reliable. |
C.It needs to be better organized. | D.It covers wide geographical areas. |
1. Where is the weather forecast mainly about?
A.The United States and Britain. |
B.The United States and Canada. |
C.Columbia and San Francisco. |
A.58. | B.68. | C.78. |
A.Sunny and warm. | B.Sunny and windy. | C.Cloudy and windy. |
A.In the morning. | B.In the afternoon. | C.In the evening. |
10 . It’s a few weeks since both the United States and the European Union confirmed the hottest average global temperature ever recorded. Intense and unusual heat waves, along with fires, storms, and other extreme weather events, seemed to make 2023 the year when climate change became more disturbing.
Of course, climate change is more complicated than things simply getting hotter, but the overall warming of the earth is perhaps the most direct consequence of the carbon dioxide we have released (释放) into the atmosphere since the 19th century. What to do about this problem is the subject of this month’s cover story, in which writer Sam Howe Verhovek and photographer Davide Monteleone take a closer look at carbon removal.
Ideas for how to remove carbon from the atmosphere and store or use it in some way have been around for a long time, but we’ve made little progress. Now we may be at the point where urgency, combined with technological advances, market demands, and creative vision, is making carbon removal a better choice for helping us manage the climate crisis.
Many environmentalists argue that carbon removal is a red herring (鲱鱼) that take our attention away from the need to dramatically reduce our emissions(排放). The first industrial revolution got us into this mess; maybe a second one can assist us with getting out of it.
1. What makes the year of 2023 more disturbing?A.The wildfire led to heavy forest loss. |
B.Various types of climate disaters occured frequently. |
C.The global temperature broke the historical record. |
D.Extreme weather caused a large number of death↵. |
A.The rise of average global temperature. |
B.The technology of global carbon removal. |
C.The emission of carbon dioxide for a long time. |
D.The changes of complicate c climate in the late years. |
A.Unsatisfied. | B.Unclear. | C.Thrilled. | D.Approving. |
A.Making carbon removal. | B.Reducing carbon emission. |
C.Slowing down the industrial development. | D.Enhancing the second industrial revolution. |