组卷网 > 知识点选题 > 意外事故
更多: | 只看新题 精选材料新、考法新、题型新的试题
解析
| 共计 19 道试题
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中(0.65) |
名校
文章大意:这是一篇记叙文。主要讲述了29岁的杰森·沃诺克(Jason Warnock)在汽车事故中英勇救人的故事。

1 . In a close-up (特写), one man is pulling the other with all his strength through the window of an SUV, a type of vehicle, which is stuck dangerously on a cliff (悬崖) 30 feet above a busy roadway.

Jason Warnock, then 29, is the man performing the life-saving action. He was driving in Lewiston, Idaho, in April 2015 when he came upon a fallen tree in the middle of the road. “I was like, ‘What happened’?” he told a news website. Warnock stretched out his neck to stare up the side of a cliff. At the very top, where the tree should have been, was an SUV swinging on the edge, held back from falling to the road by a delicate, heavily damaged chain-link fence. Looking inside the car, Warnock could see a panicked Matthew Sitko, 23, beating on the passenger-side window.

That’s when Warnock sprang into action. He crossed a nearby footbridge, and climbed up the cliff to get to the vehicle. When Warnock got to the car, he tried breaking the window with a tool he had on him, only to realize that his cracking was shaking the car and might cause it to slip down the hill. He stopped and turned to calming Sitko enough to get him to open the window. “Give me your hand,” Warnock said. “If this thing goes, I want to have a hold of you so I can at least get you out of there.” Before reaching for the lifeline, Sitko had one request: “Can I grab my phone?” Soon enough, Warnock had freed both man and his machine.

According to the Lewiston police chief, the accident was caused when Sitko, who suffered only minor injuries, lost control of his car. For his part, Warnock insisted he came to Sitko’s aid for one simple reason: “I just did what anyone would do.”

1. Where was Matthew Sitko’s SUV when spotted?
A.On a cliff.B.By a river.
C.On the road.D.Under a tree.
2. Why did Warnock stop breaking the window?
A.His strength ran up.
B.His tool stopped functioning.
C.He worried about his own safety.
D.He realized the possible consequence.
3. What is the cause of the accident?
A.The SUV was beyond repair.B.The SUV was out of control.
C.Sitko was severely injured.D.Sitko was sleepy and tired.
4. Which of the following can best describe Warnock?
A.Calm but stubborn.B.Daring but anxious.
C.Caring and decisive.D.Optimistic and strong.
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中(0.65) |
文章大意:本文是一篇记叙文。 Connor 在一次交通事故中失去了生命, Connor 的父亲David化悲痛为力量,为大学设立奖学金并宣传安全驾驶知识。

2 . Coming of age is that time in each of our lives when we begin to see the possibilities. The world opens up in ways that mature our vision and give us a sense of responsibility and gratefulness. Connor had just started college and loved being at that stage in his life where he could eat all the pizza he wanted, yet engage in adult conversations with his parents about the responsibility to make life better for others. Connor’s optimism was infectious. There was so much he could do, and so much he could become.

But it all ended one night when Connor was distracted while driving on a Colorado highway. A young man, who gave off so much light, suddenly went dark.

Connor’s father, David, took it particularly hard.A father sees more than his own traits(性格) in his son; he sees greater possibilities than he achieved. Taking that hope away left David feeling at a loss. But Connor ‘s optimism was one of those traits passed on to him by his father. So, David got to work.

First, he established the Honor Connor Scholarship Fund to reward students who served in the community, Next, he went to work creating a research-based curriculum that educates University of Colorado Boulder students and their families about the dangers of texting while driving. It includes a very simple three part promise: Do not text or use social media while driving, speak out if riding with a driver who is distracted and encourage friends and family to drive phone-free.

David now works with lecturers at various colleges’ and high schools, ensuring young minds understand how statistically at risk they are when they text while driving. He’s become a passionate advocate for preparing young people to drive safely and not reach for their phones while they’re at the wheel. “I just don’t want other parents to go through what I did when I lost Connor,” says David. “It’s just so preventable.”

1. What’s the purpose of paragraph 1?
A.To give the background of a funny story.
B.To explain why David chose to volunteer.
C.To set off David’s great pain of losing his son.
D.To sing high praise for Connor’s healthy growth.
2. What happened to Connor on a Colorado highway?
A.The headlight of his car went wrong.
B.He drove carelessly and died in an accident.
C.He suffered an accident for his father’s fault.
D.He died from another driver’s careless driving.
3. From whom did Connor get the positive attitude towards life?
A.His coach.B.His grandfather.C.His teacher.D.His father.
4. Why did David work with lecturers under a research-based curriculum?
A.He wanted to take a job in a college.
B.He took the classes that Connor hadn’t finished.
C.He wanted to prevent similar sad stories repeating.
D.He honored Connor for what he had done in the community.
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 较难(0.4) |
名校

3 . As 17-year-old Torri’ell Norwood drove through Florida, last February, the laughter and chatter from the four teenage girls inside her car quickly gave way to screams. As they approached an intersection, another car T-boned them, sending their car sailing into the yard of a nearby home, coming to a stop only when it crashed into a tree.

As smoke rose from the car, a bystander shouted, “It’s about to blow up! Get out!” Shaken, but otherwise OK, Norwood crawled out through the window as the driver’s side door couldn’t be opened. Along with two of her friends, who’d also managed to free themselves, she ran for her life. But halfway down the street, she realized that her best friend, Simmons, wasn’t with them. Norwood ran back and found Simmons unconscious in the back seat. She threw open the back door and pulled her friend out. She dragged Simmons a few feet to safety and laid her on the ground. After checking her pulse and found there was no sign of life, she started CPR.

Had the accident happened a few weeks earlier, she might not have known what to do. But just the day before, Norwood, who wanted to pursue a career in medicine, had earned her CPR certificate by learning on her own. Kneeling on the lawn and looking down at her dying friend, Norwood knew she had precious little time to practice what she’d learned.

She started pumping Simmons’s chest with her interlocked fingers and breathing into her friend's mouth in hopes of filling her lungs with the kiss of life. After quite a while, Simmons began coughing and taking quick deep breaths for air. The CPR had worked! Soon, the ambulance arrived and rushed Simmons to the hospital. And then she heard how her best friend had saved her life. “I wasn't shocked,” Simmons told others. “She will always help any way she can.”

1. What caused the car crash?
A.Another car hit Norwood’s car near the intersection.
B.Norwood drove the car too quickly that day.
C.Norwood’s car crashed into a tree in a yard.
D.The girls were too excited to notice another car.
2. What’s Norwood’s immediate reaction after hearing the bystander’s warning?
A.She crawled out through the window and ran without stopping.
B.She dragged her friends out and performed CPR at once.
C.She ran for her life but turned back to save her friend.
D.She opened the driver’s side door and pulled her friend out.
3. Why did Norwood know how to perform CPR?
A.She had learned CPR in school classes.B.She pursued a career in medicine.
C.The bystander told her how to do it.D.She just earned her CPR certificate.
4. What’s the best title of the passage?
A.Breath of Life.B.A Frightening Night.
C.Power of Knowledge.D.An Admirable Girl.

4 . As reported in JAMA Surgery, the researchers discovered that e-scooter (电动摩托车) injury rates had increased dramatically in just four years, rising from 6 per 100,000 in the population to 19 per 100,000. Of the estimated 14,651 e-scooter-related injuries in 2018, 4,658, or 32%, involved the head. “While most people recover from head injuries, there is going to be a subset with long-term disability and life changes,” said Dr. Benjamin Breyer.

Dr. Benjamin Breyer of the University of California, Los Angeles, pointed to a 2019 analysis of the data from two hospitals in Southern California, which found just 4.8% of injured e-scooter riders were wearing helmets.

Dr. Joann Elmore, a professor of medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, believed that most e-scooter users are probably unaware of the risks. To make the point, she described a photo taken by a colleague. “There were two riders on an e-scooter,” she said. “No one had shoes on. There were no helmets. And the woman in front had a baby in a baby carrier.”

The new report highlights the need for more research on new technologies, said Dr. Guohua Li, a professor of epidemiology (流行病学).

“Just as there is a global network of experts working on infectious diseases, there needs to be a similar program devoted to the surveillance (监视) and prevention of injuries caused by merging technologies products and lifestyles, such as e-scooters, e-sports, etc.,” Li said in an email.

“The challenge for researchers and policymakers is to keep up with the ever-changing society and protect the public from unnecessary harm caused by new technologies and products without hindering innovation,” he added.

1. What can we know from the passage?
A.E-scooter injury rates had increased due to speeding.
B.32% of injured e-scooter riders weren’t wearing helmets.
C.There is a program devoted to the prevention of injuries caused by advanced technologies.
D.Both protection and innovation are of great importance.
2. What does the underlined word “hindering” probably mean?
A.Preventing.B.Limiting.
C.Developing.D.Making progress.
3. What’s the author’s main purpose of writing the passage?
A.To arouse people’s awareness of the risks and self-protection.
B.To introduce a new way of transport — e-scooters.
C.To ask people not to ride e-scooters any more.
D.To urge policymakers to make laws as soon as possible.
2021-03-05更新 | 49次组卷 | 1卷引用:福建省厦门双十中学2020-2021学年高二上学期期中考英语试题
智能选题,一键自动生成优质试卷~

5 . As reported in JAMA Surgery, the researchers discovered that e-scooter(电动摩托车) injury rates had increased dramatically in just four years, rising from 6 per 100,000 in the population to 19 per 100,000. Of the estimated 14,651 e-scooter-related injuries in 2018, 4,658, or 32%, involved the head. “While most people recover from head injuries, there is going to be a subset with long-term disability and life changes,” said Dr. Benjamin Breyer.

Dr. Benjamin Breyer of the University of California, Los Angeles, pointed to a 2019 analysis of the data from two hospitals in Southern California, which found just 4.8% of injured e-scooter riders were wearing helmets.

Dr. Joann Elmore, a professor of medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, believed that most e-scooter users are probably unaware of the risks. To make the point, she described a photo taken by a colleague. “There were two riders on an e-scooter,” she said. “No one had shoes on. There were no helmets. And the woman in front had a baby in a baby carrier.”

The new report highlights the need for more research on new technologies, said Dr. Guohua Li, a professor of epidemiology(流行病学).

“Just as there is a global network of experts working on infectious diseases, there needs to be a similar program devoted to the surveillance(监视,监察) and prevention of injuries caused by merging technologies products and lifestyles, such as e-scooters, e-sports, etc.,” Li said in an email.

“The challenge for researchers and policymakers is to keep up with the ever-changing society and protect the public from unnecessary harm caused by new technologies and products without hindering innovation,” he added.

1. What can we know from the passage?
A.E-scooter injury rates had increased due to speeding.
B.32% of injured e-scooter riders weren’t wearing helmets.
C.There is a program devoted to the prevention of injuries caused by advanced technologies.
D.Protection and innovation are of equal importance.
2. What can we infer from Dr. Joann Elmore’s comments?
A.She is an anti-scooter.
B.The woman in front was pregnant.
C.She is concerned about the e-scooter users.
D.Most e-scooter riders often drive at high speed.
3. What does the underlined word “hindering” probably mean?
A.Preventing.B.Limiting.
C.Developing.D.Making progress.
4. What’s the author’s main purpose of writing the passage?
A.To arouse people’s awareness of the risks and self-protection.
B.To introduce a new way of transport — e-scooters.
C.To ask people not to ride e-scooters any more.
D.To urge policymakers to make laws as soon as possible.
2020-11-06更新 | 307次组卷 | 4卷引用:福建省福州市四校联盟2021届高三上学期期中联考英语试题(含听力)

6 . Mount Hood is the highest mountain in Oregon, a state in the western United States. At 3,400 meters it is attractive (有吸引力的) to many people, some of whom, of course, run into trouble. Each year 25 to 50 people have accidents or get lost on Mount Hood and require rescue. Although most of these are understandable accidents, a few result from careless risk-taking.

In one recent case, three experienced climbers went hiking (远足) in the middle of a snowstorm in December. Most hikers climb Mount Hood in May or June when the weather conditions are favorable. But in December, the mountain is covered in snow and ice. Winds up to 135 kilometers per hour blow the snow around making it difficult to see. Temperatures can drop below freezing. As one rescue worker put it, “What were they thinking? They were just asking for it.”

During a rescue a few years ago, a helicopter full of rescue workers crashed (坠毁) and the rescue workers were almost killed. Linda Carle, who lives in the Mount Hood area, asks, “If someone made a poor decision, why should rescue teams have to risk their lives to save them? Why do people take unnecessary risks and do things that aren’t right if they know that they can get into trouble?”

Most of the Mount Hood rescue workers are either volunteers (志愿者) or part of the local sheriff’s department. There is no charge for these rescues. It is the taxpayers (纳税人) who pay the bill. Linda Carle suggests that people who take careless risks and require rescue should be charged for the rescue. She feels it is only fair that costs for things like damaged helicopters and medical care for rescuers be paid for by the people who took the risk. What would you do if you were the local sheriff at Mount Hood?

1. What can we learn about Mount Hood?
A.It lies in the south of the United States.
B.It is the highest mountain in the United States.
C.The best time to climb the mountain is in May or June.
D.Hundreds of people get lost in the mountain every year.
2. What Linda Carle says in the third paragraph shows a feeling of        .
A.peaceB.prideC.lonelinessD.anger
3. According to Linda Carle, risk-takers should        .
A.pay for all the costs neededB.learn to save themselves
C.be taxed at a higher rateD.work as volunteers
4. The author’s purpose in writing the text is to        .
A.ask the government to provide more rescuers
B.introduce Mount Hood to mountain climbers
C.advise climbers to think twice before they act
D.report some serious accidents in Mount Hood

7 . It was an amazing feeling to be acknowledged for the Pride Of Britain award at No 10 Downing Street.

The last thing you expect when doing something as ordinary as picking your son up from a sleepover is to end up saving three people’s lives in a plane crash—but that’s exactly what happened to me in May this year.

I think I was acting unconsciously. I jumped out, leaving Giacomo in the car.

The plane was upside down and flames were coming out of the driver’s seat and I could hear screaming. I think there must have been roughly half a minute between getting the first and last person out. Then another guy—who turned out to be Joel Snarr—arrived on the scene to help at just the right time. I don’t think I’d have been able to get the pilot out—he was a big guy. There is no way he would have survived if Joel hadn’t been there. I could tell straight away Joel had a military background by how he conducted himself. We’d just got all three of them to a safe distance when the aircraft was completely swallowed by the flames.

Giacomo and I stared at each other, almost laughing in relief.

The emergency services arrived pretty quickly, and we were at the scene for a couple of hours while they dealt with the fire and cleared the roads. Afterwards I spoke to the family,and that was the first time the emotion of the whole thing hit me.I kept randomly bursting into tears.

Thankfully, Stuart Moore, the pilot, and his nephew and niece Jack Moore, 19, and Billie Manley, 16, have all since made a full recovery. Jack and Billie were suffering a lot more than I was. Although they were safe, the memory of being inside that burning plane would have been more of an emotional scar.

1. What do we know about the author?
A.He prided himself on being helpful.
B.He regretted having saved the family.
C.He was overcome by fear and despair then.
D.He was well equipped with first-aid knowledge.
2. What is the fourth paragraph mainly about?
A.Joel Snarr’s character.B.The importance of teamwork.
C.The rescue process.D.An investigation of the air crash.
3. Why did the author and Giacomo laugh in relief?
A.It was a narrow escape.
B.They both appreciated Joel’s help.
C.They both survived the crashing plane.
D.The emergency services arrived in time.
4. What is the best title for the text?
A.An Unforgettable Award.B.A Crashing Plane.
C.A Thrilling Rescue.D.An Exciting Experience.
9-10高三·福建宁德·阶段练习
名校

8 . Mr. Peter Johnson, aged twenty-three, battled for half an hour to escape from his trapped car yesterday when it landed upside down in three feet of water. Mr. Johnson took the only escape route—through the boot(行李箱).

Mr. Johnson’s car had finished up in a ditch(沟渠) at Romney Marsin, Kent after skidding on ice and hitting a bank. “Fortunately, the water began to come in only slowly,” Mr. Johnson said. “I couldn’t force the doors because they were jammed against the walls of the ditch and dared not open the windows because I knew water would come flooding in.”

Mr. Johnson, a sweet salesman of Sitting Home, Kent, first tried to attract the attention of other motorists by sounding the horn and hammering on the roof and boot. Then he began his struggle to escape.

Later he said, “It was really a half penny that saved my life. It was the only coin I had in my pocket and I used it to unscrew the back seat to get into the boot. I hammered desperately with a hammer trying to make someone hear, but no help came.”

It took ten minutes to unscrew the seat, and a further five minutes to clear the sweet samples from the boot. Then Mr. Johnson found a wrench and began to work on the boot lock. Fifteen minutes passed by. “It was the only chance I had. Finally it gave, but as soon as I moved the boot lid, the water and mud poured in. I forced the lid down into the mud and scrambled clear as the car filled up.”

His hands and arms cut and bruised(擦伤), Mr. Johnson got to Beckett Farm nearby, where he was looked after by the farmer’s wife, Mrs. Lucy Bates. Huddled in a blanket, he said, “That thirty minutes seemed like hours.” Only the tips of the car wheels were visible, police said last night. The vehicle had sunk into two feet of mud at the bottom of the ditch.

1. What is the best title for this newspaper article?
A.The Story of Mr. Johnson, A Sweet Salesman
B.Car Boot Can Serve As The Best Escape Route
C.Driver Escapes Through Car Boot
D.The Driver Survived A Terrible Car Accident
2. Which of the following objects is the most important to Mr. Johnson?
A.The hammer.B.The coin.C.The screw.D.The horn.
3. Which statement is true according to the passage?
A.Mr. Johnson’s car stood on its boot as it fell down.
B.Mr. Johnson could not escape from the door because it was full of sweet jam.
C.Mr. Johnson’s car accident was partly due to the slippery road.
D.Mr. Johnson struggled in the pouring mud as he unscrewed the back seat.
4. “Finally it gave” (Paragraph 5) means that _______.
A.Luckily the door was torn away in the endB.At last the wrench went broken
C.The lock came open after all his effortsD.The chance was lost at the last minute
5. It may be inferred from the passage that _______.
A.the ditch was along a quiet country roadB.the accident happened on a clear warm day
C.the police helped Mr. Johnson get out of the ditchD.Mr. Johnson had a tender wife and was well attended
2020-08-29更新 | 95次组卷 | 6卷引用:福建省宁德三县市一中2010届高三第二次联考(英语)

9 . On Christmas Day, 2003, a woman named Nancy Sue Brown took her daughter and grandchildren to see a movie at an AMC theater. When the movie was over, the crowd made for the exits. A theater employee had just finished mopping the hallway and dutifully placed the “wet floor” sign in the slippery area. No one slipped due to the wet conditions, but someone did manage to knock over the sign. And by the time Ms. Brown got to the area, the sign was lying on the floor. And shortly thereafter, so was she. Her foot got caught in the sign, in a bad way, and she fell. Unfortunately Ms. Brown had undergone a back operation, and the fall caused more damage than it otherwise would have. So she and her husband accused AMC.

AMC argued that the entire point of the “wet floor” sign above was to warn of danger, and therefore, courts should encourage the use by not allowing Brown’s case to proceed(继续进行). AMC referred to a case about a December,1998 incident where a “wet floor” sign, not in use, fell to the floor causing another trip-and-fall. In that case, Georgia’s Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the store, but didn’t go so far as to say that “wet floor” signs couldn’t give rise to legal responsibility in trip-and-fall accidents. In the Brown case, the Supreme Court therefore rejected AMC’s argument that the former case applied.

But the Browns argued something surprising that the “wet floor” sign was, itself. dangerous, because “using this type of sign in areas passed by lots of customers creates an unreasonable risk of foreseeable harm to the public in the form of tripping risks.” That’s right- the safety sign, used in the way it was designed, was itself dangerous. The court thankfully didn’t accept that argument, at least not entirely. But it did conclude that Browns case could continue to a jury(陪审团)-“a merchant’s selection and use of equipment designed to warn customers of one danger that has the potential to expose them to a different one”.

1. According to the text, Ms. Brown___________.
A.slipped on the wet floorB.tripped over a warning sign
C.knocked over warning signD.was knocked down by the crowd
2. AMC mentioned the 1998 case in order to__________.
A.accept its legal responsibility for Ms. Brown’s loss
B.prove Ms. Brown had some physical problems
C.stress that it had no legal responsibility for the accident
D.prove other customers were responsible for the accident
3. What can we learn about the Brown’s case from the last paragraph?
A.It would be judged by jury.
B.It would not be allowed to proceed.
C.The court would rule in favor of AMC.
D.The court accepted all the arguments of the Browns.
4. The underlined word “one” in the last paragraph refers to “_______”.
A.dangerB.customer
C.business ownerD.equipment in public places

10 . A loud sound woke Dan at 8:15 in the morning. Looking out of his bedroom window, he spied a tree in smoke about 500 yards away. A car was stuck around the tree’s base, its engine on fire.

“I grabbed buckets of water.” Dan told the reporter. Then he and his girlfriend ran to the crash site. The car was divided nearly in two, and the tree was where the driver’s seat ought to have been, as if planted there. There was 16-year-old Thompson, his terrified face pressed against the driver’s side window, in great pain. Dan tried putting out the fire with his buckets of water with no success. “When the flames got into the front seats, I realized I had to get him out of there.” he told WAGM-TV.

“I feel like I just did what had to be done.” said Dan. Regardless of his own safety, Dan opened the car’s back door and crawled in. Thompson was struggling to get free. Dan said, “That’s when I noticed how bad his legs were.” Using a pocket knife, he cut off Thompson’s seat belt. Dan pulled him out of the window of the vehicle, and then dragged him to safety before the entire car was engulfed in flames. Although Thompson suffered serious injuries in his legs, he looked great, smiling. Dan thought about that day often. “There was a voice deep down telling me to act at once.” He said.

1. What do we know from the text?
A.Dan put out the fire with water at once.
B.Dan saved Thompson from the car accident.
C.Thompson and his girlfriend were trapped in the car.
D.Thompson got free from the seat with a knife by himself.
2. Which of the following best explains “engulf” underlined in the last paragraph?
A.Swallowed.B.Exposed.
C.Affected.D.Polluted.
3. Which of the following words can best describe Dan?
A.Enthusiastic and talented.
B.Courageous and calm.
C.Cooperative and generous.
D.Ambitious and professional.
2020-05-21更新 | 36次组卷 | 1卷引用:福建省宁德市2019-2020学年高二上学期期末考试英语试题
共计 平均难度:一般