1. Where is the speaker now?
A.In a hospital. | B.In a college. | C.In a pet school. |
A.It cures the patients. | B.It makes patients feel better. | C.It helps do a lot of things. |
A.Play with patients and their children. |
B.Accompany patients to their hospital rooms. |
C.Be familiar with the hospital and pick up things. |
A.In a hotel. | B.In the classroom. | C.In a hospital. |
3 . Cooking or baking has become a common cure for stress or feeling down, but there might actually be some science behind it. A study conducted by researchers followed 658 people for two weeks and found that a little creativity each day can go a long way towards happiness and satisfaction in daily life.
“There is growing recognition in psychology research that creativity is associated with emotional functioning,” Tamlin Conner, lead author on the study, explained. “However, most of this work focuses on how emotions benefit or prevent creativity, not whether creativity benefits or hampers (妨碍) emotional well-being.” By following detailed diaries kept by the study subjects, Conner found that in addition to feeling happier, people who worked on little creative projects every day also felt they were “flourishing”—a psychological term that describes the feeling of personal growth.
This isn’t the first time researchers have drawn a line connecting making food with positive feelings. In recent years, psychologists have started spending more time exploring cooking and baking as a therapeutic (治疗的) tool to help people dealing with things like depression and anxiety.
“When I’m in the kitchen, measuring the amount of sugar or butter I need for a recipe—I am in control,” baker John Whaite, who won “The Great British Bake Off” in 2012, told BBC.
For people like Whaite, who is suffering from manic depression, baking can help their mood by providing small tasks to focus on in a manner similar to meditation (冥想). In order to put together a good meal, cooks have to be constantly in the moment, adding ingredients, adjusting the heat of the stove and tasting their food—all of which can be helpful techniques in treating some forms of mental illness.
“A lot of us turn to baking when we’re feeling low.” Melanie Denyer, the founder of the Depressed Cake Shop, a bakery designed to draw awareness to mental health conditions, says. “Some of us even started baking because they were ill and needed something simple as a focus. And there is genuinely something very therapeutic about baking.”
Baking may not be a be-all and end-all cure for mental illness, but anyone in need of lifted spirits should consider pulling out the flour and warming up the oven.
1. What is the focus of most psychology research on creativity and emotions?A.The benefits of creative projects on emotions. |
B.The impacts of emotion on creativity. |
C.The harm of creativity to emotional well-being. |
D.The effects of creativity on emotional well-being. |
A.To provide an alternative form of meditation. |
B.To promote healthy and balanced eating habits. |
C.To assist individuals in handling mental problems. |
D.To help people with serious physical illnesses. |
A.It won him “The Great British Bake Off”. |
B.It helped him gain a sense of control. |
C.It cured his depression through meditation. |
D.It enabled him to become more creative. |
A.Cooking and baking are creative activities. |
B.Baking is a complete cure for mental illness. |
C.Small creative tasks lead to improved emotional well-being. |
D.Following recipes leads to personal growth in creativity. |
4 . Speaking to The Guardian at the Third International Conference on Human genetic editing, Prof Jennifer Doudna, a 2020 Nobel chemistry prize winner, said, “We’ll definitely be seeing genetic therapies (治疗;疗法) for heart diseases, brain diseases, and eye conditions.” But she warned, “One of the riskiest and most realistic potentials is that trials of gene editing in embryos (胚胎) will probably follow.”
The technology can and will smooth the way for therapies for enhancing healthy humans, to make them faster, smarter, stronger, or more resistant to diseases, though enhancement would be more difficult than mending single faulty genes. According to the experts at the conference, including geneticists, public health researchers and philosophers, a wave of gene editing therapies were expected to reach clinics in the next five years or so. The therapies will correct disease-causing disorders in tissues and organs and become mature as researchers work out how to make multiple edits at once and reach difficult areas such as parts of the brain.
However, Doudna and the other experts also expressed their concern that the next generation of advanced genetic therapies raises serious issues that must be tackled to ensure the technology benefits patients and society. Prof Françoise Baylis, a philosopher at Dalhousie University in Canada, was worried that in addition to the sure sign of genetic enhancement coming, the cost of the new therapies would be too high for much of the global population. Prof Mayana Zatz, at the University of São Paulo, Brazil, said she was against editing genes for improvement but added, “There will always be people ready to pay for it in private clinics and it will be difficult to stop.”
One conclusion almost all experts shared was that while all these potential problems and risks did exist, a future full of promise would definitely be witnessed. After all, it is not technology itself but ways in which people employ it that decide the result.
1. Which is not considered as beneficial by Prof Jennifer Doudna?A.Gene editing for diseases in heart. |
B.Gene editing for diseases in brain. |
C.Gene editing for diseases in embryos. |
D.Gene editing for diseases in eyes. |
A.Genetic therapies are more difficult than mending. |
B.Society will benefit from genetic therapies entirely. |
C.Genetic therapies have already reached some clinics. |
D.All disorders can’t be corrected by genetic therapies. |
A.Editing genes for improvement is unavoidable. |
B.Editing genes for improvement is promising. |
C.The cost of the new therapies would be too high. |
D.Editing genes for improvement should carry on. |
A.Objective. | B.Negative. | C.Supportive. | D.Unconcerned. |
5 . Every day on the respiratory (呼吸道) ward at one of Kyrgyzstan’s biggest hospitals, Aidai Temiraly kyzy, a 24-year-old nurse, puts on the music and leads her patients in the Kara Jorgo, the national dance of the central Asian country.
This involves a range of body movements and leaves everyone smiling — but Temiraly kyzy is not doing it for fun. The session is part of a treatment programme offered to people with COPD — a common, preventable and treatable lung condition.
COPD develops from midlife onwards; symptoms include breathlessness, a chronic cough, and tiredness. It is one of the top three causes of death worldwide, and 90% of deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Globally, there are 3 million deaths a year from COPD but this number is expected to rise to 5.4 million by 2060.
Treatment for COPD in many countries involves prescribing (开处方) oxygen, inhalers and antibiotics (抗生素), which patients have to buy. In Kyrgyzstan this can cost more than a monthly salary. Sooronbaev, director of the National Centre of Cardiology and his team started experimenting with pulmonary rehabilitation, a physical exercise programme designed in 2016 for people with lung conditions.
Over the years, the programme has expanded and now it is already in place in three hospitals. Added to lectures and patient support groups is a regime (体系) of physical exercise incorporating (融合) elements of volleyball, walking, cycling on exercise bikes and dance.
Dr. Azamat Akylbekov, a pulmonologist in Bishkek, has seen the transformative effect. “I remember one woman who was 63,” he says. “She cried because she had severe shortness of breath, coughed all the time and took a lot of strong antibiotics and inhalers. She was really depressed.”
She was invited to take part in the programme and the results surprised him. “Afterwards, she was like a flower — she smiled and her body language was more active. That sticks in my mind.”
Sooronbaev wants pulmonary rehabilitation to be available throughout the country from this year. Patients who have undergone the programme are being trained to teach others, and Sooronbaev and colleagues are due to speak at medical conferences to inform other healthcare professionals about their progress with the programme.
1. Why does the author mention Temiraly kyzy’s story?A.To show the hardship of being a nurse. | B.To stress the significance of happiness. |
C.To call on patients to dance to music. | D.To introduce a new approach to COPD. |
A.The causes of COPD. | B.The severity of COPD. |
C.The distribution of COPD cases. | D.The various symptoms of COPD. |
A.It has proved to be effective. | B.It needs more tests on patients. |
C.It is a heavy cost to COPD patients. | D.It is widely practiced in Kyrgyzstan. |
A.The programme will be extended. |
B.The programme will be difficult to practice. |
C.The programme is being taught in schools. |
D.The programme lacks professional support. |
A.At home. | B.In a car. | C.In a hospital. |
Did you ever imagine that one day we could enjoy the benefits of Traditional Chinese Medicine in a cup of coffee?
Traditional Chinese Medicine, or TCM, is
But if you ask younger generations of Chinese, few visit TCM shops nowadays, let alone brew these time-tested remedies for
The concept of combining TCM herbs
As Traditional Chinese Medicine becomes more
8 . Hospice (临终安养院) services benefit only about one person in three who dies in the US. “There are still over one million Americans who die each year without receiving hospice services,” according to a report produced in 2003. And for most who do get hospice care, their time in hospice is so short that staff members often lack the opportunity to provide the best care for their physical and emotional needs.
There are several reasons that more patients do not go into hospice care earlier. One is that Medicare (医疗保险) doesn’t cover the cost of patients’ life-extending treatment if they enter hospice. Medicare also requires that the doctor referring someone for hospice care must declare that the patient is expected to die within six months. As a result, some doctors hesitate about making an early referral to avoid being accused of cheating. Finally, there are simply not enough hospice centers and services available to meet the needs of dying patients throughout the country.
Many patients still have some concern over how hospice works. The philosophy of hospice is to neither accelerate nor postpone death. As Dr. Matt Kestenbaum, a hospice director, put it: “We let nature take its course, and we give patients all the things they need to be comfortable.”
Dying “naturally” in hospice does not deny patients the treatment for common diseases like blood clots. Hospice expenses are automatically covered by Medicare and most insurers provide hospice coverage as well.
Choosing hospice care does not mean patients lose the services of their personal doctors. They can return to regular insurance benefits when they leave hospice care because their condition improves or they want a therapy the hospice does not provide.
One thing bothering doctors is that patients will lose hope if they go into hospice. But the goal should be to refocus hope on what might be realistically achieved in the time remaining. A patient who enters hospice can have the opportunity to spend quality time with family and friends and settle unfinished business.
1. Why don’t many patients go to hospice earlier?A.Because patients have to stay in hospice for a long time. |
B.Because Medicare requirements aren’t in favor of hospice. |
C.Because doctors can’t predict how long patients will live. |
D.Because most hospice services are far away from patients. |
A.To extend patients’ life. | B.To ease patients’ sufferings. |
C.To reduce patients’ costs. | D.To settle patients’ business. |
A.They will lose treatment for common diseases. |
B.Hospice can’t provide the treatment they need. |
C.Doctors may give them unrealistic hope. |
D.They will be separated from their family. |
A.To criticize America’s Medicare system. |
B.To explain why hospice is unpopular. |
C.To introduce the way hospice works. |
D.To popularize hospice services. |
9 . A cancer treatment no longer means what it used to be. Just a few decades ago, the survival rate beyond five years was less than 50%. Now, nearly 70% of those who get cancer survive that long, and that rate is set to rise. Why? Because, more than ever, chemotherapy (化疗) and radiation, once the only ways of cancer treatment, are being paired with or replaced by varieties of new drugs and treatments.
For example, the first medication for what was previously considered an “undruggable” lung cancer was recently approved in the United States, Canada, Europe and the U.K. And a brand-new precise chemotherapy drug delivered directly to breast cancer cells is giving hope to patients with the HER 2-positive form of the disease.
Another discovery has been the promise of a treatment called immunotherapy, as researchers around the world have discovered ways to use the body’s own immune (免疫) system to battle cancer cells.
Also driving hope is a focus on prevention. Decades of research and public education have led to greater awareness of how lifestyle changes can reduce our risk of developing cancer. According to an article from the journal Pharmaceutical Research and published by the National Institutes of Health, 90% to 95% of cancers can be owed to environment and lifestyle, rather than to genetic (基因的) factors.
Employing vaccines (疫苗) is another effective way of prevention. Take the mRNA cancer vaccines for example. The speedy development of COVID-19 vaccines was thanks to foundations already laid by researchers who had been working for years to create mRNA vaccines to fight cancer. These vaccines use a specially programmed molecule (分子) to activate an immune response in the body’s cells. Unlike the COVID-19 vaccines designed to help protect billions of people, each cancer mRNA vaccine is tailored to treat a single patient’s cancer.
In fact, this personalized approach can be made for everyone, and for every cancer.
1. Why is the survival rate beyond five years rising now?A.Because new drugs and treatments have come out. |
B.Because chemotherapy and radiation get advanced. |
C.Because new drugs have been paired with old ones. |
D.Because new treatments have replaced the old ones. |
A.All the cancers are not related to genetic factors. |
B.Most cancers have no relationship with lifestyle. |
C.A focus on prevention is our only hope to deal with cancer. |
D.All cancers have relationship with environment and lifestyle. |
A.The COVID-19 vaccines can be used to fight some cancers. |
B.One cancer mRNA vaccine can’t be used for another cancer. |
C.One cancer mRNA vaccine can be used to treat patients of the same cancer. |
D.The COVID-19 vaccines were created from previous cancer mRNA vaccines. |
A.A diary entry. | B.A news report. |
C.A book review. | D.A science fiction. |
10 . On January 7th, 2022, David Bennett became the first person to have a heart transplanted successfully into him from a pig. On that occasion, mere operation success was the goal. This operation is a milestone for xenotransplantation (异种移植)— the transfer of organs from other species to human patients.
For decades, researchers have attempted to deal with xenotransplantation’s basic problem. This is that the human body, when it recognizes foreign tissue, tends to turn against it. In the case of pigs, the most important marker of foreignness is a sugar molecule (分子) called alpha-Gal. While this molecule does not exist in humans, antibodies to kill it do. So no transplant from a pig with alpha-Gal would last more than a couple of minutes in a human body. In 2003 pigs were produced with a changed genome so as to prevent the enzyme (酶) responsible for making alpha-Gal. This was a step in the right direction, but other barriers popped up.
The pig for David’s operation had a genome changed in ten ways to increase the chances of success. Three genes had been removed to reduce the risk of a human antibody rejecting the organ. A fourth, a growth gene, had also been knocked out, to ensure the heart did not enlarge after transplantation. And six human genes had been added to promote acceptance.
There are other concerns. One is any unknown rejection mechanism. Another is the possibility that the organ may pass viruses to its new host. The pig in question was raised where there was no virus to reduce the chance of that, but it remains a possibility.
In theory, pigs can be raised to provide humans with any solid organ, but some will be more complex than others. Moreover, even if these barriers can be overcome, most researchers still acknowledge that increasing xenotransplantation to meet the world’s demand for organs may take decades. After this news, however, the chances that it will happen eventually have increased.
1. What is the basic problem of xenotransplantation?A.The human body lacks alpha-Gal. |
B.The human body resists foreign tissues. |
C.The life of the transplanted organ is too short. |
D.The enzyme is prevented from making alpha-Gal. |
A.Because it would change David’s genome. |
B.Because it would lead to heart enlargement. |
C.Because it would make the heart more acceptable. |
D.Because it would be recognized by David’s antibodies. |
A.It saved the patient’s life perfectly. |
B.It had a decreased number of genes. |
C.It had an unknown rejection mechanism. |
D.It was raised in a virus-free environment. |
A.Optimistic. | B.Indifferent. | C.Disturbed. | D.Uncertain. |