1 . Up to one fifth of the Amazon rainforest is emitting more carbon dioxide (CO2), than it absorbs, new research suggests. Results from a decade-long study of greenhouse gases over the Amazon rainforest appear to show around 20% of the total area has become a net source of CO2 in the atmosphere. One of the main causes is deforestation. While trees are growing, they absorb CO2 from the atmosphere; dead trees release it again. However, the fact is that millions of trees have been lost to logging and fires in recent years.
The results of the study, which have not yet been published, have implications for the effort to combat climate change. They suggest that the Amazon rainforest, a vital carbon “store”, or “sink”, that slows the pace of global warming may be turning into a carbon source faster than previously thought. Every two weeks for the past 10 years, a team of scientists led by Professor Luciana Gatti, a researcher at Brazil’s National Institute for Space Research (INPE), has been measuring greenhouse gases by flying aircraft fitted with sensors over different parts of the Amazon basin. What the group found was startling: while most of the rainforest still retains its ability to absorb large quantities of CO2 — especially in wetter years — one portion of the forest, which is especially heavily deforested, appears to have lost that capacity.
Gatti’s research suggests this south-eastern part of the forest, about 20% of the total area, has become a carbon source. “Each year is worse,” she told Newsnight. “We observed that this area in the south-east is an important source of carbon. And it doesn’t matter whether it is a wet year or a dry year. 2017 was a wet year, but it didn’t make any difference.”
A forest can become a source of carbon rather than a “store”, or “sink”, when trees die and emit carbon into the atmosphere. Areas of deforestation also contribute to the Amazon’s inability to absorb carbon.
Carlos Nobre, who co-authored Prof Gatti’s study, called the observation “very worrying” because “it could be showing the beginnings of a major tipping point”. He believes the new findings suggest that in the next 30 years, more than half of the Amazon could transform from rainforest into savanna (稀树草原).
1. Which of the following might Professor Luciana Gatti agree with?A.Most of the Amazon rainforest absorbs more CO2 in wetter years. |
B.The Amazon rainforest is on its way to becoming the biggest source of carbon. |
C.Deforested areas tend to perform better in terms of absorbing carbon in dry years. |
D.The Amazon rainforest has completely lost its ability to slow the pace of global warming. |
A.Striking. | B.Convincing. | C.Confusing. | D.Disgusting. |
A.Northeastern. | B.Southwestern. | C.Southeastern. | D.Northwestern. |
A.Other worrying phenomena about the Amazon. |
B.More explanations for the “Amazon tipping point”. |
C.Other peopled opinions on effects of deforestation. |
D.Comparison between old findings and new ones. |
增加:在缺词处加一个漏字符号(∧),并在其下面写出该加的词。
删除:把多余的词用斜线(\)划掉。
修改:在错的词下划一横线,并在该词下面写出修改后的词。
注意:1.每处错误及其修改均仅限一词;
2.只允许修改10处,多者(从第11处起)不计分。
As is known by us, our government is trying to make our city the National Civilized City at present. We hope we can also do our best to help realize this goal.
First of all, we should mind our words and deeds and become civilized citizens. Always remember to say “Please” and “Thanks” and don’t talk and laugh loudly in public. Seen people in trouble, we might as well to lend them a helping hand. In addition, be civilized pedestrians. We must observe traffic rules and never cross the streets before the traffic lights are red. At same time, keeping our environment cleanly is also advisable, it means we shouldn’t litter or spit in public places. Only by starting with the little things around us we make a great difference to our city image.
Let’s take measure now and make joint efforts to make our city more civilized.
3 . In July 2017, Hoh Xil became a world heritage (遗产) site and there live more than 70, 000 Tibetanantelopes. Every year, pregnant (怀孕的) Tibetan antelopes migrate (迁徙) to Hoh Xil between the end of May and early June to give birth and leave with their children around August. Zonag Lake at the heart of Hoh Xil is known as the “delivery room” for the species.
About 40 female Tibetan antelopes with three young were spotted crossing the Qinghai-Tibet Railway Saturday. Experts say that in recent years, the number of young Tibetan antelopes among the migrating groups consisted of between a fifth and quarter of the population.
“In the early stage of migration, Tibetan antelopes face a high risk of falling prey to predators (盗猎者) so the number of young Tibetan antelopes is relatively small, and there may even be none,” said Lian Xinming, an associate research fellow at Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
According to research, the number of Tibetan antelopes that migrate back has been rising. A total of 5, 952 Tibetan antelopes were spotted migrating in 2020, and 233 more in 2021. “This year’s migration season is expected to finish in early September. The population is expected to continue to increase,” Lian said.
Tibetan antelopes are mostly found in Tibet autonomous region, Qinghai province, and Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region. The species is under first-class state protection in China.
In the 1980s, the Tibetan antelope population declined sharply from 200, 000 to 20. 000, due to illegal hunting. It has recovered thanks to the country’s efforts to improve its habitat and crack down on poaching (盗猎).
To make sure the species go back to their habitats safe and sound, the reserve’s management bureau has staff monitor their migration. When they come over in large groups, they temporarily close some sections of the road to make way for the animals and prevent them from having interactions with humans.
1. What can we learn from the text?A.Tibetan antelopes migrate to Hoh Xil to find mates. |
B.Baby Tibetan antelopes are born in Zonag Lake. |
C.Female Tibetan antelopes made up a fifth of the population. |
D.Migrating Tibetan antelopes’ number is 6,185 in 2021. |
A.Promising. | B.Concerning. | C.Perfect. | D.Unpredictable. |
A.To offer delivery place. |
B.To catch unlawful predators. |
C.To stop poaching Tibetan antelopes. |
D.To avoid animals meeting people. |
A.The Habitats of Tibetan Antelopes |
B.The Migration of Tibetan Antelopes |
C.The Methods to Stop Poaching Tibetan Antelopes |
D.The Measures of Protecting Tibetan Antelopes |
4 . Wolves once ranged over most of North America. But they were nearly wiped out by the early 20th century in the neighbor U. S. by widespread hunting and trapping. Much of them were funded by government , and only a small population were hanging on in the Great Lakes region. They were put on the Endangered Species List in the 1970s, and in 1995 and 1996 the federal government reintroduced wolves to Yellowstone National Park and Idaho. But wolves still don’t have stable numbers in Colorado. Voters narrowly(勉强地)approved a proposal, giving the way for gray wolves to be reintroduced into Colorado, where they nearly died out by the 1940s.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife will lead the effort to establish a sustainable (可持续的)population of the animals in the western part of the state, beginning in 2022 or 2023. The Southern Rocky Mountains contain millions of acres of suitable habitat land that could support several hundred wolves or more, biologists say.
Those who were against the proposal admitted they lost, but the vote was close. As of Thursday afternoon, with 90 percent of the votes in, there were 1,495,523 votes for and 1,475,235 against. “Reintroducing wolves will help thin out sick animals, keeping healthy populations of deer, and thus protecting the grass and reducing erosion (土壤侵蚀). ”says Jonathan Proctor.
People in rural areas are against the reintroduction proposal, including farmers, who worry that wolves will kill their cattle. Many don’t agree to leave the question of reintroduction to voters.
Supporters point to the successful reintroduction of wolves to the Northern Rockies in the 1990s, where only one in 10, 000 cattle in wolf-occupied counties is killed by the hunters, Proctor says. The Colorado proposal will also fund a program to make up for the farm animals being killed.
1. What’s the function of Paragraph 1?A.Finding typical examples. |
B.Introducing wildlife research. |
C.Giving the reason for the proposal. |
D.Discussing the numbers about migration. |
A.kill their cattle | B.cause erosion |
C.thin out sick animals | D.protect the grass |
A.To increase the farmers’ interests. |
B.To keep Colorado’s natural balance. |
C.To contribute to gradual soil erosion. |
D.To cause concern about the climate change. |
A.Suggestions from biologists. |
B.Extra fund for losing farm animals. |
C.Knowledge of raising farm animals. |
D.The right to reclaim their valuable land. |
社团名称 | 低碳生活社 |
社团宗旨 | 低碳生活,从我做起 |
成员义务 | 衣:衣着朴素,收集旧衣赠灾区人民 食:在饭堂吃饭时按量取食,吃天然或简单包装食品 住:少用空调,使用节能灯,循环用水、纸张等 行:步行、骑自行车或使用公共交通工具 玩:选择能源消耗少的娱乐,如爬山、游泳、打球等 |
2.词数不少于100(开头已给出,但不计入总词数)。
Dear Jack,
How have you been? I’m glad to tell you that I have recently joined the “Low-carbon Living Club” in our school.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Truly,
Li Hua
A material can be really special when it was named after the place where it
Nowadays, the
All the four artists gave white porcelain a model style, each in their own way. And this is what the exhibition’s theme comes from. It’s a dialogue between the past
增加:在缺词处加一个漏字符号(∧),并在其下面写出该加的词。
删除:把多余的词用斜线(\)划掉。
修改:在错的词下划一横线,并在该词下面写出修改后的词。
注意:1.每处错误及其修改均仅限一词;
2.只允许修改10处,多者(从第11处起)不计分。
Last Thursday, we have had a class meeting to discuss where to go for our autumn trip. We came up with several choices such as going boating, climbing a mountain, and going to park. Finally, we decided to go mountain climbing. The next day, we left to the mountain early in the morning. While climbing the mountain, we enjoyed the warm sunshine and the beautiful sceneries. However, when we reached the top, we were shocking to see rubbish here and there, such as bottles and banana peels. We felt sadly that many tourists didn’t take good care of nature. Soon, they started to pick them up. With all the rubbish putting in the rubbish bin, the place looked many more beautiful than before. When we came back, it was 5:30 in the afternoon. We were tired and happy.
Scientists in Antarctica have made a surprising and welcome
The researchers have been exploring the region hoping
The beautiful Li River is one of the
Water quality in the Li River had suffered
Finally, a series of urgent steps were taken
10 . A leaked IPCC draft reports, “Widespread use across millions of square kilometers globally of tree-planting and bioenergy crops could have potentially serious consequences for food security and land degradation (退化).” In other words, more massive monocultures (单种栽培) and more bioenergy crops, fueled by more fertilizers, could damage the structure of the environmental soil and its capacity to absorb carbon.
Everyone knows that to help ease the increasing climate crisis, we need to plant new trees. It’s said that the earth could support an additional 9,000,000 square kilometers of forest, potentially hosting 500 billion trees capable of capturing more than 200 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide at maturity. It would be a serious help to the environment.
Bioenergy now holds a 50 percent share of the world’s renewables consumption—as much as hydro, wind, solar and all others combined. It’s good news, but not entirely. If we consider that increasing desertification and rising ocean levels will take away more arable (可耕种的) land, we arrive at a crucial “trilemma”(三难困境). Should we use our spare soil for agriculture, reforestation or bioenergy?
Such a question would make sense in a multilateral, harmonious world, not on a planet where the richest country cancels an environment-saving agreement, thus encouraging the most tropically-forested nation to set about cutting trees.
Last year, 36,000 square kilometers of forest was cut down. Wouldn’t it be better to start by stopping deforestation altogether? Animal farming takes up 77 percent of the world’s arable land and provides us with 18 percent of the calories. Shouldn’t we cut back on global meat consumption? Modern bioenergy is already available. Shouldn’t we get rid of first-generation biofuels, which are produced from food crops?
1. What’s the IPCC’s attitude to the widespread planting?A.Ambiguous | B.Positive | C.Disapproving | D.Uncaring |
A.Add some background information. | B.Summarize the previous paragraphs. |
C.Provide some advice for the readers. | D.Introduce a new topic for discussion. |
A.There is less sustainable energy for use. |
B.No more land is available for bioenergy. |
C.More trees are cut in the richest country. |
D.Bioenergy can cause more climate problems. |
A.Developing farmland as much as possible. |
B.Planting trees to prevent global warming. |
C.Using bioenergy to reduce environmental pollution. |
D.Protecting present resources instead of developing new ones. |