1 . A man got depressed about life. In spite of all his
“Do you see that fern (蕨类植物) and bamboo there?” the farmer said, pointing towards two
“So, did the bamboo tree lie quietly for four years only to grow rapidly in the
“Did you know that you had been
A.advice | B.effort | C.fear | D.evidence |
A.surprised | B.motivated | C.defeated | D.relieved |
A.excitement | B.failure | C.knowledge | D.food |
A.farms | B.seeds | C.gardens | D.plants |
A.quickly | B.immediately | C.hardly | D.likely |
A.since | B.if | C.unless | D.although |
A.get down to | B.look forward to | C.give up on | D.go away with |
A.show | B.control | C.cut | D.water |
A.ground | B.imbalance | C.tree | D.disorder |
A.third | B.fourth | C.fifth | D.sixth |
A.obvious | B.right | C.wrong | D.complex |
A.clear | B.strong | C.early | D.close |
A.information | B.calmness | C.success | D.growth |
A.resting | B.waiting | C.struggling | D.smiling |
A.reported | B.realized | C.ignored | D.assessed |
2 . Plastic is everywhere in our modern world. Its toughness makes it an extremely useful material from household items to vehicle parts, but that same toughness makes it hard to break down for recycling or disposal (处理). However, Japanese scientists at the University of Tokyo have developed a new plastic material that can be broken down more easily and can self-heal and remember past shapes.
Based on a kind of plastic called an epoxy resin vitrimer, which is brittle (脆性的), the new plastic has a huge range of advantages. Once scratched (刮划) with a knife, it can completely patch itself up after being heated to 150 ℃ for just 60 seconds. When shaped into the shape of a crane, then flattened, it can fold itself back into the crane shape by being heated up. It does all of this much faster than others of its type.
The new plastic can also break down easier. Even if it’s thrown into the environment, it still has less of a problem than other kinds of plastic, which the team demonstrated by placing it in seawater for 30 days. It biodegraded (生物降解) by 25% and released something that is eatable for ocean life.
The new plastic is more resistant to breaking. It can also repair itself, and can recover its original memorized shape. It even biodegrades safely in a ocean environment, according to Shota Ando, a researcher of the study.
The material can be used in a variety of applications. “Building materials for roads and bridges are often composed of epoxy resins mixed with compounds (化合物) such as concrete and carbon,” said Ando. “By using the new plastic, these would be easier to maintain as they would be stronger and healable using heat. Unlike conventional epoxy resins, this new material is hard but flexible, so it could also be expected to strongly bond materials of different hardness and stretch.”
1. What is the author’s purpose in writing paragraph 1?A.To introduce the topic of the text. | B.To show the disadvantages of plastic. |
C.To highlight the importance of plastic. | D.To show his views on previous plastic. |
A.Change itself. | B.Destroy itself. | C.Repair itself. | D.Burn itself. |
A.It is safe for animals in the ocean. | B.It is made up of concrete and carbon. |
C.It can change its shape when frozen. | D.It is more brittle than previous plastic. |
A.How to Make a New Plastic | B.An Interesting Scientific Study |
C.The Widespread Application of Plastic | D.A New Environmentally Friendly Plastic |
3 . Imagine this: You’re at a movie theater food stand loading up on snacks. You have a choice of a small, medium or large soda. The small is $3.50 and the large is $5.50. It’s a tough decision: The small size may not last you through the whole movie, but $5.50 for some sugary drink seems unreasonable. But there’s a third option (选择), a medium soda for $5.25. The medium might be just right for you, but the large only cost a quarter more. If you’re like the majority of people, you end up buying the large.
If you’re wondering who would purchase the medium soda, the answer is almost no one. Actually, there’s a good chance that the marketing department purposely priced the medium soda as a decoy (诱饵), making you more likely to buy the large soda rather than the small.
I have written about this unique human nature previously with my friend Dan Ariely, who, after noticing pricing for subscription (订阅) to The Economist, studied this phenomenon extensively. The digital subscription was $59, the print subscription was $125, and the print plus digital subscription was also $125. No one in their right mind would buy the print subscription when you could get digital as well for the same price, so why was it even an option? Ariely ran an experiment and found that when only the two “real” choices were offered, more people chose the less-expensive digital subscription. However, the bad option increased people’s likelihood of selecting the expensive print plus digital option.
Brain scientists call this effect “asymmetric dominance” and it means that people are attracted to the option that is closest to an obviously inferior (较差的) option. Marketing professors call it the decoy effect, which is certainly easier to remember. It works because of the way our brain assigns value when making choices. Value is rarely absolute; rather, we decide an object’s value relative to other choices. If more options are introduced, the value equation (方程) changes.
1. Why do the shops give the third option — the medium soda?A.To offer people more choices. | B.To give people the right size of soda. |
C.To help people save some money. | D.To earn more money. |
A.The Economist’s print edition turns out to sell the best. |
B.More readers choose the digital over the print edition. |
C.Lower-priced goods attract more customers. |
D.The Economist’s promotional strategy works. |
A.https://www.lifestyle.com/health | B.https://www.science.com/local |
C.https://www.consumers.com/money | D.https://www.education.com/science |
A.By considering its usefulness. | B.By comparing it with other choices. |
C.By examining its former value. | D.By taking its low quality into account. |
4 . Growing up, I understood one thing about my dad: He knew everything. In my teen years, he taught me things I’d need to know to survive in the real world: how to drive a stick shift, how to check the car tyre’s (轮胎) pressure, and the correct knife to use to cut a cantaloupe.
When I moved out on my own, I called him at least once a week, usually when something broke in my apartment and I needed to know how to fix it: the toilet, the air-conditioning, the wall, once, when I threw a shoe at a terrifying spider.
But then, eventually, I needed him less. I got married, and my husband had most of the knowledge I lacked about gutter (排水沟) cleaning and water heaters and nondestructive insect removal. For everything else, we had Google. I didn’t know when it happened, but our conversations turned into six words when I called. Me: “Hi, Dad.” Him: “Hi, sweet. Here’s Mom.”
I loved my dad, of course, but I wondered at times if maybe he had already shared everything I needed to know. Maybe I’d heard all his stories. Maybe, after knowing a man for 40 years, there’s nothing left to say. Then, two summers ago, my husband, our four kids and I moved in with my parents for three weeks while our house was being painted. They owned a lake house, and my dad asked me to help him rebuild the bulkhead (舱壁). It was a hard and manual job. We got wet and sandy. But as we put the new bulkhead together piece by piece, my dad knew exactly what went where. I looked at him, “How do you know how to build a bulkhead?” “I spent a summer in college building it on the Jersey Shore.”
“You did?” I thought I knew everything about my dad, but I never knew this. I realized that maybe it’s not that there’s nothing left to say. Maybe it’s just that I’ve spent my life asking him the wrong questions. That day, my dad talked about what he had learned and what he could do excitedly. We chatted and chatted for a long time.
A few weeks later, after my family and I moved back into our painted house, I called my parents. “Hi, sweets,” he said. “Here’s Mom.” “Wait, Dad,” I said. “How are you?” We ended up talking about everything he was working on. To anyone else, it would sound like a normal conversation between a dad and his daughter. But to me, it was novel and a new beginning. I spent the first part of my life needing to talk to my dad. Now I talk to him because I want to.
1. Why did the author feel that she needed to call her dad before she got married?A.She called to make sure he was pleased. | B.She wanted to talk to him for knowledge. |
C.She knew her parents missed her so much. | D.She was asked to call him once a week. |
A.Her father was old and he didn’t keep up with the world. |
B.Her father always thought he was right in everything. |
C.She didn’t have more to learn from him than she thought. |
D.She spent her younger ages asking him too many questions. |
A.The author’s mother is answering the phone. | B.The author’s mother knows what has happened. |
C.He will give the phone to the author’s mother. | D.He finds the author’s mother sweet and kind. |
A.Creative and faithful. | B.Selfless and brave. |
C.Inspiring and generous. | D.Loving and experienced. |
1. 表示欢迎;
2. 推荐旅游城市;
3. 表达祝愿。
注意:1. 写作词数应为80个左右;
2. 请按如下格式在答题卡的相应位置作答。
Dear Adam,
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yours,
Li Hua
6 . Preet Chandi, an Asian woman, returned from a trek (徒步旅行) across Greenland last year. She hopes to
Preet Chandi
In the south pole, one may
When she returns, she plans to put aside some money to
A.apply | B.design | C.complete | D.introduce |
A.refreshing | B.extreme | C.bearable | D.slight |
A.falls down | B.checks out | C.sets off | D.turns up |
A.admits | B.doubts | C.hopes | D.prays |
A.working | B.adjustment | C.struggle | D.training |
A.buying | B.dragging | C.painting | D.collecting |
A.passers-by | B.explorers | C.visitors | D.cyclists |
A.activities | B.adventures | C.competitions | D.sports |
A.push | B.run | C.head | D.look |
A.control | B.ability | C.reach | D.knowledge |
A.make | B.taste | C.see | D.smell |
A.challenge | B.trouble | C.dilemma | D.success |
A.played | B.recorded | C.presented | D.taken |
A.remind | B.persuade | C.command | D.fund |
A.seldom | B.morally | C.legally | D.typically |
7 . Music exists almost every human culture on earth. The oldest discovered musical instruments date back over 40,000 years to the Stone Age.
In prehistoric times, music promoted tighter social bonding between group members. Singing and drumming together released chemicals like dopamine and endorphins, inducing positive emotions that strengthened social connections.
Early music likely aided communication too. Rhythmic drumbeats and calls organized the actions and movements of groups during hunts or battle. Singing while working made labor less boring. Mothers may have sung primitive tunes to children as an early form of emotional communication.
In all these ways, music increased survival chances in human evolution. Natural selection then embedded (嵌入) the capacity for music into our biology. Supporting this, scientists have discovered specific regions of the brain devoted to musical processing. Children have an inborn ability to detect musical patterns and different tonal pitches.
A.Music also strengthened defenses. |
B.Music can bring humans a lot of joy. |
C.Music also helped to win the battle. |
D.But scientists believe music itself could be much older than that. |
E.We connect with music now simply because we are born to do so. |
F.Even patients with severe dementia (痴呆) respond actively to their favorite childhood songs. |
G.This allowed groups to cooperate better in hunting, children-caring and protection against outside threats. |
8 . Some people travel because they want to go to warm places for winter vacations or because they want to visit art museums in Europe. But other people travel simply because they have a passion for it.
Luisa Yu, a 79-year-old woman, fell in love with travel as a young girl in the province of Leyte in the Philippines when she watched movies. “I saw the beautiful scenery, the rivers and the mountains, and that fascinated me,” Yu said. “That’s why I always thought someday I would go to these places and travel.”
At 23, as an exchange student studying medical technologies in the US, Yu decided that she wanted to visit all of the countries in the world, but visa restrictions (限制) didn’t allow her to travel outside of the country.
It took Yu 15years to get her admission allowing her to travel internationally and there were times when she worked three jobs to save money to travel. She eventually took a part-time job as a travel agent, which gave her many more opportunities to travel to new places around the globe.
For the past 50 years, Yu has been visiting countries across the world, even some that are very difficult to get into. She has tried dog meat when she visited the DPRK, explored the beaches of Somalia, and even skydived in Dubai when she was 73. “Everyone said, ‘Don’t go to Somalia, that’s dangerous,’” Yu said. “If I want to go somewhere, nobody can stop me. I want to do everything.”
Yu achieved her goal to visit all of the 193 countries that are recognized by the UN, in November 2023. To date, there have only been around 400 people who have set out to achieve this amazing cause.
Yu’s advice to people who love to travel is to just do it. “Don’t wait for anybody. If I keep on waiting, it will never happen, because the opportunity sometimes comes only once,” she said.
1. What inspired Luisa Yu’s passion for travel?A.The wonderful settings of the movies. | B.The desire to take a winter vacation abroad. |
C.The dream of visiting art museums in Europe. | D.The studying opportunities while taking trips. |
A.She searched for fortune through travel. | B.She longed to be a travel agent. |
C.She shot to fame by accident. | D.She was fond of challenges. |
A.Tough-minded and devoted. | B.Considerate and gifted. |
C.Humorous and knowledgeable. | D.Responsible and powerful. |
A.Meet Luisa Yu: One of 400 People Recognized by UN |
B.Follow Luisa Yu’s Example: Seeking Adventure on Traveling |
C.79-Year-Old Woman Has Traveled to 193 Countries Around the World |
D.Travel Agent Surprises the World with the Longest of Travel Experience |
9 . Taking between 9,000 and 10,000 steps per day appears to reduce the risk of an early death or heart-related event, adding reason to an idea that has been considered as unscientific.
The exact origin of the commonly held belief that people should aim for 10,000 steps a day is unclear, but it has been linked to a marketing plan promoting pedometers (计步器) in Japan. Now, a study by Matthew Ahmadi at the University of Sydney, Australia, and his colleagues suggests the figure could hold some truth.
The team studied more than 72,000 participants, with an average age of 61, in the UK Biobank study as they wore a movement-tracking accelerometer (加速度计) on their wrists for one week. “We were able to know their daily steps,” says Ahmadi. The participants were then tracked for an average of just under seven years.
During that time period, 1,633 people died and 6,190 heart-related events occurred. After adjusting other factors that could influence the risk of illness or death over that period—such as diet quality, smoking and doing other forms of exercise, the researchers found out that the best number of steps per day appears to be between 9,000-and 10,000, with the benefits then starting to tail off. Doing so was linked to a 39% lower risk of dying during the follow-up period and a 21% lower risk of a heart-related event. “It does appear to support the belief that the originally non-evidence based 10,000 steps target may indeed be about right,” says Dale Esliger at Loughborough University in the UK.
However, while the study was “extremely well designed” with “careful methods and statistical analysis”, Esliger says wrist-worn accelerometers aren’t always the best indicator of step count. The researchers also didn’t consider the number of steps taken per minute. “It’s possible that around 6,000 steps performed at a higher pace may be just as health protective as 10,000 slower steps,” says Esliger.
1. What’s the finding of the study?A.More than 10,000 steps a day do harm to the body. |
B.21% of the participants died of heart-related events. |
C.Walking 10,000 steps a day benefits physical health. |
D.Hitting the target of 10,000 steps a day makes no sense. |
A.How the study is carried out. |
B.Whether a previous belief is true. |
C.What is concluded about the study. |
D.Why other factors should be removed. |
A.Objective. | B.Unconcerned. | C.Favorable. | D.Doubtful. |
A.A science magazine. | B.A technology report. |
C.A history book. | D.An educational website. |
10 . Flaco the owl (猫头鹰) is gone, but his life had all the elements of a classic hero’s story, not soon forgotten. Flaco lived a dozen years in a comfortable cage in the Central Park Zoo where little happened and less was needed. His life was a safe existence without freedom. Then, a year ago, someone released him.
On Friday, when he died of injury, perhaps from a collision (碰撞) with a Manhattan apartment building’s glass windows, his death offered us a chance to reckon with the question at the heart of many a hero’s journey: Can we put a price on freedom?
Flaco’s liberation from his cage came at a cost — he spent the final year of his life free, but threatened from all sides by a booming city. Was it worth it?
Almost from the moment he was released, Flaco became a symbol of hope for many of the people who followed his story and recognized parts of themselves in him. Some saw him as the symbol of the American dream, an outsider who had come to Manhattan and made a life for himself here, like millions of others who arrived penniless and unconnected in search of freedom.
As a result, he flew around the city. We were terrified that he’d succumb to (屈服于) the dangers of city life. Flaco had no experience living outside a cage, and New Yorkers initially doubted his chances of survival. We worried that he’d eat a rat with enough poison in its system to kill him. But Flaco never looked back. Perhaps freedom itself was the home he’d discovered.
And though we feared for him, his new life excited us. How many of us, our circumstances familiar and sale, are too frightened to seek our more fully realized selves?
How many of us, viewing our confinements as nothing out of the ordinary, have long stopped wondering what our wings are for?
Have we not all desired a life beyond the range of the one we lead? Flaco showed that our desire is not misplaced. His choice proved a truth that given a chance, living things choose freedom of movement.
1. What do the underlined words “reckon with” in Paragraph 2 probably mean?A.Bring up. | B.Deal with. | C.Reflect on. | D.Look into. |
A.He died a natural death. |
B.He was caught and returned to the zoo. |
C.He died from a collision with a building. |
D.He lived a free life but faced many threats. |
A.They were excited and supportive. |
B.They were worried about his survival. |
C.They were indifferent and unconcerned. |
D.They were angry and opposed to his release. |
A.The importance of protecting wildlife. |
B.The risks and rewards of seeking freedom. |
C.The value of overcoming challenges in life. |
D.The need for more awareness about animal rights. |