A crisis is on the way. Global warming? The world economy? No, the decline of reading. People are just not doing it anymore, especially the young. Who’s responsible? What is responsible? The Internet, of course, and everything that comes with it—Facebook, Twitter, etc.
There’s been a warning about the coming death of literate civilization for a long time. In the 20th century, first it was the movies, then radio, then television that seemed to end the written world. None did. Reading survived; In fact, it not only survived, but it has developed better. The world is more literate than ever before — there are more and more readers and more and more books.
The fact that we often get our reading material online today is not something we should worry over. The electronic and digital revolution of the last two decades has arguably shown the way forward for reading and for writing. Interconnectivity allows for the possibility of a reading experience that was barely imaginable before. Where traditional books had to make do with photographs and illustrations(插图), an e-book can provide readers with an unlimited number of links:to texts, pictures, and videos.
On the other hand, there is the danger of trivialization(碎片化).One Twitter group is offering its followers single-sentence-long“digests”of the great novels. War and Peace in a sentence? You must be joking. We should fear the fragmentation(碎片)of reading. There is the danger that the high-speed connectivity of the Internet will reduce our attention span(时间)—that we will be incapable of reading anything of length or which requires deep concentration.
In such a fast-changing world, in which reality seems to be remade each day, we need the ability to focus and understand what is happening to us. This has always been the function of literature and we should be careful not to let it disappear. Our society needs to be able to imagine the possibility of someone entirely in pace with modern technology but able to make sense of a dynamic, confusing world.
1. In Paragraph 2,we can learn .A.the disappearance of traditional books |
B.the development of human civilization |
C.the historical challenges for reading |
D.the birth of pioneering e-books |
A.1imited link |
B.imaginative design |
C.low cost |
D.varied contents |
A.Doubtful | B.Worried |
C.Shocked | D.Hopeful |
A.Technology is an opportunity and a challenge for traditional reading. |
B.Technology pushes the way forward for reading and writing. |
C.Interconnectivity is a feature of new reading experience. |
D.Technology offers a greater variety of reading practice. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Scientists have found further evidence that dolphins call each other by "name".
Research has revealed that the marine mammals use a unique whistle to identify each other. A team from the University of St-Andrews in Scotland found that when the animals hear their own call played back to them, they respond.
Dr. Vincent Janik, from the university's Sea Mammal Research Unit, said, "Dolphins live in this three-dimensional (三维) environment, offshore without any kind of landmarks and they need to stay together as a group. These animals live in an environment where they need a very efficient system to stay in touch. "
It had been long suspected that dolphins use distinctive whistles in much the same way that humans use names. Previous research found that these calls were used frequently, and dolphins in the same group were able to learn and copy the unusual sounds. But this is the first time that the animals' response to being addressed by their "name" has been studied. To investigate, researchers recorded a group of wild bottlenose dolphins, capturing each animal's signature sound. They then played these calls back using underwater speakers.
“We played signature whistles of animals in the group; we also played other whistles in their repertoire (曲目) and then signature whistles of different populations-animals they had never seen in their lives," explained Dr. Janik.
The researchers found that individuals only responded to their own calls, by sounding their whistles back. The team believes the dolphins are acting like humans: when they hear their names, they answer.
Dr. Janik said this skill probably came about to help the animals to stick together in a group in their vast underwater habitat. He said, "Most of the time they can't see each other, they can't use smell underwater, which is a very important sense in mamma is tor recognition, and they also don't tend to hang out in one spot, so they don't have nests or burrows that they return to.”
1. How can the marine mammals distinguish their group members?A.By using a special whistle. | B.By using special gestures. |
C.By speaking special languages. | D.By different means of swimming in the sea. |
A.They can answer while being called. |
B.They can express their feelings with words. |
C.They can perform different whistles. |
D.They can live individually or in groups. |
A.See each other clearly. |
B.Use the smell underwater. |
C.Have nests and get back regularly. |
D.Call each other by name and make response. |
A.Protecting natural environment. |
B.The scientific discoveries. |
C.The development of scientific technology. |
D.The harmonious relationship between man and animals. |
This is the classic rule for mass media. “They want your eyeballs and don’t care how you’re feeling,” Jonah Berger, a psychologist at University of Pennsylvania told The New York Times.
But with social media getting increasingly popular, information is now being spread in different ways, and researchers are discovering new rules--good news can actually spread faster and farther than disasters and other sad stories.
Berger and his colleague Katherine Milkman looked at thousands of articles on The New York Times’ website and analyzed the “most e-mailed” list for six months.
One of his findings was that articles in the science section were much more likely to make the list. Those stories aroused feelings of awe (敬畏) and made the readers want to share this positive emotion with others.
Besides science stories, readers were also found to be likely to share articles that were exciting or funny. “The more positive an article was, the more likely it was to be shared,” Berger wrote in his new book. “For example, stories about newcomers falling in love with New York City,” he writes, “tended to be shared more than the death of a popular zookeeper.”
But does all this good news actually make the audience feel better? Not necessarily.
According to a study by researchers at Harvard University, people tend to say more positive things about themselves when they’re talking to a bigger audience, rather than just one person, which helps explain all the perfect vacations that keep showing up on microblogs. This, researchers found, makes people think that life is unfair and that they’re less happy than their friends.
But no worries. There’s a quick and easy way to relieve the depression you get from viewing other people’s seemingly perfect lives--turn on the television and watch the news. There is always someone doing worse than you are.
1. Bad news covers most papers because .
A.the public care for reading tragedies |
B.the public intend to express sympathy for victims |
C.mass media want to attract the public’s attention |
D.mass media appeal to the public to help victims |
A.The perfect vacation of your friend |
B.The story of a determined inventor |
C.The death of a popular zookeeper |
D.The flood hitting a small town |
A.bad news always makes people sad |
B.people prefer to share bad news with a bigger audience |
C.people can relieve the depression by reading good news |
D.good news sometimes has negative influence |
A.Good News Spreads Fast |
B.Bad News Travels Fast |
C.The Effect of Bad News |
D.The Power of Good News |
【推荐3】In late 2020, a tweet spread quickly: “Another day of sharing at the big screen while scrolling through my little screen so as to reward myself for staring at the medium screen all week.” It seems right on. We are glued to our screens. And it’s not only about watching movies and scrolling through TikTok. As remote work has set in, we’re relying entirely on digital tools to keep in touch with each other and get our work done.
This has led to a worrisome spike in “digital intensity”. A new survey from Microsoft tracked the habits of more than 30,000 users in 31 countries over 2021, and the results are alarming.
The good news is that something as simple as a 10-minute break, if used correctly, can help lessen the effects of digital intensity. “If you give yourself a break, and do something like meditation (冥想), reading, drawing — anything that turns your brain to something more relaxing,” says Dr. Michael Bohan, the director of Microsoft’s Human Factors Engineering Lab, “it will begin to produce alpha waves.” After the break, “you’ll be more engaged and focused,” he adds. “Taking breaks lets you reset, and maintain better brain health across the day.”
Finding new ways to connect with our colleagues, and reducing the number of daily meetings, emails and virtual check-ins will do more than “lessen the digital load”. It will also pave the way for a reinvented workplace, which most expect to be a hybrid of old and new. “We need to look at every process,” says Bohan, “and ask: Why are we doing this Is there a way to do this more effectively Let’s not repeat what we’ve always done. Let’s figure out how to do it better.”
1. What does the first paragraph mainly talk about?A.The popularity of digital products. | B.Our deep dependence on digital tools. |
C.The reasons for the rise of remote work. | D.The influence of social software on our life. |
A.A sharp increase. | B.An abrupt change. |
C.A sudden problem. | D.An unexpected result. |
A.It can make us sleep better. | B.It can cause tension and anxiety. |
C.It can help improve concentration. | D.It can improve logical thinking ability. |
A.Holding less everyday video meetings. |
B.Following daily virtual check-in system. |
C.Contacting colleagues through social media apps. |
D.Using emails to communicate as much as possible. |
【推荐1】Brainstorming usually means getting a group of people together to generate new ideas. I have found a unique way of brainstorming by getting the artificial intelligence program ChatGPT to generate interesting questions and answers.
I am now working on a chapter on musical consciousness and ChatGPT has generated great questions like “What are good questions about the role of consciousness in music?” Typically, ChatGPT produces 10-20 new questions including ones that probably would not have occurred to me even with quite a lot of research. The questions generated by ChatGPT are distinct. Many of them are surprising, and some of them are highly valuable. Therefore, ChatGPT’s question generation seems to me to qualify as creative.
After ChatGPT generates a list of questions, you can get it to answer one question at a time. This process of getting ChatGPT to provide questions and answers could go on and on and on, although some repetition will turn up. The questions are always interesting, but I don’t trust the answers until I can check them out in reliable sources because ChatGPT has a bad reputation for making stuff up.
I call this new method “ChatStorming”, but it raises some difficult questions: the first is whether it is plagiarism(剽窃)to use answers provided by ChatGPT. ChatGPT has no copyright to its materials. However, it would still be intellectually dishonest to claim the writing produced by ChatGPT as your own. The second: Is ChatGPT truly capable of generating new ideas? ChatGPT is skillful at producing creative questions, but how about concepts, hypotheses(假设), and methods? To my astonishment, the results are definitely novel and surprising, but I don’t yet know whether they can also be valuable. It will take much testing and evaluation to determine whether ChatGPT and even better models like GPT-4 can be creative with new ideas as well as questions.
A third question is what it would take for a large language model to dominate humans. Large language models are major advances in AI that can further improve human creativity, but they are to be confirmed.
1. For what purpose did the author use ChatGPT?A.To seek some musical help. | B.To improve his music taste. |
C.To question its safety. | D.To study its limitations. |
A.The author refuses to accept them. |
B.The author can easily understand them. |
C.The author thinks highly of them. |
D.The author is cautious of accepting them. |
A.It can be used as freely as possible. |
B.It can provide more valuable methods. |
C.Its creativity requires to be tested. |
D.It can benefit humans a lot. |
A.A technology report. | B.A product introduction. |
C.A natural science magazine. | D.A personal blog. |
【推荐2】Perhaps you have ever heard the saying: Change is the only constant. Everyone, without doubt, goes through changes in their life, whether it is a physical state of aging or a mental state of emotional maturity. However, some are afraid to make the conscious decision to move or they think it’s too late to have a fresh start.
I have a friend named Jack. At the age of 37, he is a Senior Manager at one of the Big Four. He has a great salary, owns his own apartment and enjoys the fine things in life, but not without the heavy burdens that his job brings. On the surface, it looks like he has got life figured out. Yet when I once asked if he was happy with his work, he answered that he sometimes wished to quit his job to do something less stressful. But he’d become accustomed to this lifestyle and felt that it would be too late to give it up to achieve a new ambition.
For him, the risks are too high, so whether he can’t abide his present job or not, he has to choose to suck it up. You might have come to a similar situation as Jack’s or you might be a Jack. You’re now facing a wall. No matter what it is-the stress of your job or the terrible feeling, it’s time that you had to decide whether you’ll tear down that wall or continue to let it enclose you. I suggest pushing back the boundaries and breaking the fixed patterns. Why do you feel it’s too late to start over?That is simply because you’re comparing yourself with others-younger or more successful individuals. In fact, you should compare yourself with the older version of you.
Don’t become that person who lets life pass by only to regret it when you are making your way into old age. Don’t let your life plateau (停滞不前) and waste away in the daily chores. Don’t give up the potential you still have hidden and be locked away by your current state. Now, you’d better bravely start going after the things you want to do, without abandoning your dreams, ambitions and responsibilities.
1. What kind of people does Jack represent according to the author?A.Those leading a happy life. | B.Those having an easeful career. |
C.Those thinking it’s too late to change. | D.Those having a high ambition to work. |
A.Value. | B.Recommend. | C.Understand. | D.Tolerate. |
A.Let life stand still. | B.Enjoy the present job. |
C.Have a small goal in life. | D.Consider ourselves as a failure. |
【推荐3】From this issue, we explore why the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institute hasn't turned up anything since its founding in the 1980s. (See page 30 for more.) We asked our Facebook followers: Do you think that astronomers will find evidence of alien life in your lifetime?
Loran McCormick: 1 think they already have it. Judging by the sudden industrialization, I figure they found something that's probably been here since before humans walked the Earth.
Jens Avery: We may find life, but it may not want anything to do with us. We are not very advanced and can't even get along with each other.
Steven Buhrow: I think the more important question is — will any government ever publicly admit it in our lifetime? I fully believe that we could discover alien life today and the government would simply say the public is not ready for this information.
Jenna Walsh: I think we already see it, but just don't realize what it is. Intelligent alien life probably doesn't want anything to do with the disaster that is Earth at this point, so no doubt they're playing it safe and observing from a safe distance.
Christopher Harvey: By alien life, do you mean intelligent alien life? Then no. It would be extremely hard to find, short of them coming down to Earth. But if you mean unintelligent alien life, like bacteria or single cell, we might.
1. Why did we ask the Facebook followers the question?A.To question the efficiency of SETI. |
B.To confirm the appearance of aliens on earth. |
C.To ensure the existence of aliens. |
D.To complain about the failure to find aliens. |
A.Loran McCormick. | B.Steven Buhrow. |
C.Jenna Walsh. | D.Christopher Harvey. |
A.An album. | B.A science fiction. |
C.A magazine. | D.A travel guide. |