1 . Gracing every continent of the Earth, wetlands are essential to the planet’s health, often compared to its vital organs, acting as arteries (动脉) that carry water and as kidneys that filter harmful substances.
Wetlands serve as protectors: they form protective barriers against tsunamis and absorb the excess rainfall. During the dry season in dry climates, wetlands release the stored water which helps delay the attack of drought and reduce water shortages. They also store vast quantities of carbon, helping ease climate change. Home to some of the most diverse and rich ecosystems, wetlands support one billion people. 40 percent of all plant and animal species live or breed in wetlands.
World Wetlands Day is observed each year on 2 February to increase people’s understanding of the importance of wetlands and raise awareness of the urgent need to protect the threatened natural treasure.
“We are proud to join in this celebration and recognize the unique and valuable ecosystem services provided by wetlands. We are committed to doing our part to conserve and protect wetlands, and we are calling on all of you to join us in this vital cause,” said UNCCD (The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification) Executive Secretary Ibrahim Thiaw.
To date, nearly 90 percent of the world’s wetlands have been degraded or lost, with 35 percent in the last 50 years alone. That is why on this World Wetlands Day, UNCCD is joining the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and other partners to highlight the examples of countries and communities making strides in wetland restoration.
As stressed by the UNCCD Executive Secretary Ibrahim Thiaw, successful wetland restoration requires a joint effort from governments, civil society and the private sector. Investments in science for technology innovation, infrastructure for effective management and financial mechanisms for project implementation (实施) can turn the tide toward a better future for wetlands.
1. How does the author present the current situation of wetlands in paragraph 5?A.By giving examples. | B.By listing figures. |
C.By making comparisons. | D.By analyzing causes. |
A.Follow the trend. | B.Break the ice. | C.Run the risk. | D.Change the game. |
A.Wetland ecosystem. | B.Wetland restoration. | C.Wetland exploration. | D.Wetland biodiversity. |
dominant maximum expansion release policy resolve trend undergo decline investment |
The fast shift toward clean energy technologies means global greenhouse gas emissions may fall in 2024. Recent analysis from the International Energy Agency (IEA), based on the public
A growing number of major economies have already passed their period of
A peak in global emissions is cause for optimism — but it is far from
Earth Day was founded in 1970 as a day of education about environmental problems, and Earth Day 2020
Denis Hayes, a young activist who had served as student president at Stanford University,
The first Earth Day was effective at raising
1. Where did Tom get the idea of becoming a businessman?
A.From his college friends. |
B.From his high school teachers. |
C.From the grown-ups around him. |
A.6%. | B.18%. | C.50%. |
A.Seller and buyer. |
B.Interviewer and Interviewee. |
C.Employer and employee. |
Global warming could make humans shorter, warn scientists who are said
In fact a team from the universities of Florida and Nebraska says it has found a link between the earth
“As temperatures went up,
Horses
6 . US forests could become a “substantial carbon source” by 2070, suggesting that forests could worsen global warming instead of easing it, a new Agriculture Department report says.
US forests currently absorb 11 percent of US carbon emissions (释放), equal to the combined emissions from 40 coal power plants. The report predicts that the ability of forests to absorb carbon will start declining after 2025 and that forests could emit up to 100 million metric tons of carbon a year as their emissions from decaying (腐烂) trees go beyond their carbon absorption.
The prediction suggests that this will require the US to cut emissions more rapidly to reach net zero, according to Lynn Riley, a senior manager of climate science. “Eleven percent of our domestic emissions. That is a really significant portion,” Riley said. “As we work to decarbonize... forests are one of the greatest tools available. If we were to lose that, it means the US will contribute that much more” in emissions. The report also assesses and predicts the extent of renewable resources provided by the nation’s forests and undeveloped landscapes, including farmlands, wetlands and grasslands.
According to the report, the loss of carbon absorption is driven in part by natural disasters which are increasing in frequency and strength as global temperatures rise. Development in forested areas, which the report predicts will continue to increase, is having the same effect as people increasingly move to the so-called wildland urban areas. Aging forests also contribute as older, mature trees absorb less carbon than younger trees of the same species, and the US forests are rapidly aging.
More aggressive forest management can help by cutting down a small portion of aging forests to make ways for younger trees that absorb more carbon. A thorough study of each forest should be done before removing older trees, Riley said.
1. Why could US forests become a “substantial carbon source”?A.They fail to absorb enough carbon. | B.They begin to emit carbon increasingly. |
C.They may emit more carbon than absorb. | D.Mature trees outnumber young trees. |
A.US forests have lost their role in carbon absorption. |
B.It is urgent for the US to reduce carbon emissions. |
C.The US has contributed to 11% carbon emissions. |
D.The loss of forests contributes to less carbon emissions. |
A.Improper tree species. | B.Removal of aging trees. |
C.Decreasing urban development. | D.Frequent severe natural disasters. |
A.Aging Forests —a Major Emitter of Carbon. |
B.Growing Forests —a Solution to Carbon Emissions. |
C.Reducing Forests —a Threat to Global Warming. |
D.Decaying Forests —a Consequence of Global Warming. |
7 . 阅读下面短文,在空白处填入1个适当的单词或括号内单词的正确形式。
Meat, milk, cheese—just some of the things provided by goats. But now we can also add fire safety to this list. Wildfires
8 . A small group of Cuban dive instructors have started a project to grow coral (珊瑚) and replant it. The divers hope to restore part of Cuba’s barrier reef (堡礁). And they are working with limited financial support and using materials recovered from the coast.
Luis is one of the project’s leaders. The 44-year-old fisherman grew up on Cuba’s north coast. He said, “It’s incredible to see the loss of coral in the past 30 years.” He added, “Our dream is to make the parts of the barrier reef that have lost their coral grow again.”
To make that happen, Luis worked with other dive instructors and neighborhood schoolchildren with the support from Cuba’s environmental organizations. They began collecting pieces of coral spread across the ocean floor after large storms three years ago. The pieces were then hung on branches of underwater “trees” made from old plastic pipes and supported by fishing lines recovered from the coast. They were then “replanted” on the coral reef, fixed by nails driven into the rock. In a year, most survive and grow enough to repopulate the part of the barrier reef between 60 to 80 meters in length.
Like many coral reefs around the world, the ones in Cuba are threatened by changing water temperatures, destructive plants and animals, pollution and over-fishing. It is reported that the world has already lost 30 to 50 percent of its coral reefs.
Karine is a French diver who just visited Cuba for the first time. She said the reef looked better than others she had seen on dives elsewhere in the world, including in Africa. “The coral needs to be protected,” she said after two dives on a recent trip to nearby Varadero. She said, “It’s good to see that in Cuba they take care of what they have, and that it is still not too affected by too much tourism.”
1. What can we infer from the recovery of the Cuba’s barrier reef?A.It is just a new project to start. |
B.It is a slow and difficult process. |
C.It is mainly carried out by schoolchildren. |
D.It is greatly supported by the government. |
A.They are fastened to the rock by fishing lines. |
B.They are supported by the trees on the ocean floor. |
C.They are placed firmly by nails driven into the rock. |
D.They are hung by old plastic pipes collected on the coast. |
A.Endangered. | B.Beneficial. | C.Plentiful. | D.Harmful. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Concerned. | C.Positive. | D.Disappointed. |
The heat wave that broke high temperature records in five European countries a week ago is now over Greenland,
Melting
Greenland, the world’s
10 . I strongly believe that individual actions make a difference to our environment. I’ve been a vegetarian for more than two decades, choose to be child-free partially because I can’t justify my genes’ importance over the shocking amount of resources needed for raising another American, and haven’t owned a car in four years. Those things, over time, will absolutely reduce my impact on our beautiful world, and the more people do them, the greater the impact is.
But it’s not nearly enough.
While I will continue to do my part to fight climate change, I have to wonder why there isn’t an equal effort by those who have the biggest impact. According to a recent report, 71% of greenhouse gases are produced by just 100 companies. Surely, working to minimize their emissions (排放物) will do far more, much faster than me talking people’s ears off on Facebook about eating less meat. After all, I have been doing that kind of work for 20 years now, and we are still headed towards climate disaster.
Why should so much of the solution to global warming be on the shoulders of individuals?
When President Kennedy decided we needed to beat the Russians to the moon landing, he didn’t encourage housewives to figure out bow to get there. He got the smartest and most talented people together to solve the challenges. NASA got us there, with lots of hard work and late nights, and also full encouragement and funding from the US government.
But this is not the case with climate change. Big companies are let off the hook while we take on the huge burden of dealing with the emissions of the biggest and most powerful. That strikes me as just plain unfair. The serious threats of climate change require an all-hand-on-deck response. Corporations need to do their part, because I can’t do it on my own.
1. Why does the author choose not to have a child?A.America doesn’t have large amounts of resources. |
B.A child can’t justify the importance of her genes. |
C.She tries to avoid the trouble of raising a child. |
D.She wants to reduce her impact on the environment. |
A.Minimizing companies’ emissions. |
B.Recommending a vegetarian diet. |
C.Talking with friends on Facebook. |
D.Heading towards climate disaster. |
A.To praise housewives’ contribution. |
B.To remember a former president. |
C.To stress the importance of government’s role. |
D.To encourage NASA to take on the challenge. |