1 . Cows produce much methane (甲烷) the world’s second worst greenhouse gas, as they break down the grass. They are a large source of the greenhouse gases that are driving climate change. Now scientists have shown the pollution from cows can be reduced by adding a little seaweed (海藻) to their food.
Recently, the researchers from the University of California studied 21 cows on a farm for about five months. They taught the cows to get their food from inside a special hood, which allowed the scientists to know the amount of the methane the cows were giving off. They used a small amount of seaweed, which they mixed with the cows’ food.
The consequences were surprisingly good. In some cases, the cows produced 82% less methane. The improvement depended on the kind of food the cows were given. Even the worst-polluting cows produced 33% less methane. Over the five months, the scientists didn’t see any signs that the cows’ stomachs were getting used to the seaweed and starting to produce more methane again. What’s more, the cows that were fed seaweed gained just as much weight as the other cows.
But there are still some big problems with the idea of feeding cows seaweed. For one thing, there’s not enough seaweed to feed all of the cows in the world. So farmers would have to figure out a way to grow lots of seaweed. A bigger problem is that for most of their lives, cows live in the fields, where they eat grass. That means there’s no chance to feed them seaweed every day.
Still, as the study shows, something as simple as feeding cows seaweed can help reduce some of the pollution causing the climate crisis.
1. Why did the researchers carry out the study?A.To improve the cows’ living conditions. |
B.To test the effects of the seaweed. |
C.To measure the amount of methane produced by cows. |
D.To discover healthier grass to reduce the pollution from cows. . |
A.The background of the subjects. | B.The process of the research. |
C.The content of the experiment. | D.The results of the study. |
A.Seaweed is pretty rare in the world. |
B.It’s hard to mix seaweed with grass. |
C.Cows can hardly have daily access to seaweed. |
D.Cows fed with seaweed gained weight easily. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Positive. | C.Unclear. | D.Negative. |
2 . “Is there going to be a flood?” asked Daniel. He looked nervously at his dad and mom. They both looked worried. Dad was completely wet and dirty. He and some other men in town had spent the morning piling bags of sand on top of the levee (防洪堤) along the river. For years the levee had kept the Mississippi from flooding its banks. After three straight days of rain, though, the water grew higher and higher. If the levee broke, Daniel’s neighborhood would be flooded for sure.
“We’ll be fine,” Dad placed a reassuring hand on Daniel’s shoulder. Outside, lightning flashed, followed by distant thunder. “Just in case,” said Dad. “I think we should start moving some things to Uncle Mike’s house.” Uncle Mike lived farther away from the river on higher ground. “And we’ll take everything we need to cook and eat upstairs,” he said, “like camping out in our own house.”
By nightfall, everything the family needed had been moved upstairs. Dad had taken their new couch and TV to Uncle Mike’s. Daniel helped his dad tie a fishing boat to the front (门廊). “Just in case,” said Dad.
Lying in bed that night, Daniel tossed and turned. He could hear the heavy rain beating on the roof. “Everything will be all right,” he said to himself just before falling asleep.
Several hours later, the sound of sirens (警报器) woke Daniel from a sound sleep. He sat straight up in bed, his heart pounding. In rushed Mom ,“Get dressed, Daniel! The levee just broke! We’ re leaving. We have no other choice.”
A few minutes later they all got into the fishing boat, leaving behind just about everything they owned. Daniel asked, “We’re going to lose everything, aren’t we?”
“No, not everything”, said Mom, pulling him close. We’ll always have each other.”
“That’s right,” said Dad. “We may lose the house, but we can always rebuild it. We can’t ever lose our home, though, because home is us.”
1. What caused the levee to break?A.Bad construction. | B.High water levels. |
C.Lack of sandbags. | D.People’s carelessness. |
A.shaking | B.disturbing | C.disappointing | D.comforting |
A.By taking a fishing boat. | B.By being saved by the police, |
C.With the help of Uncle Mike. | D.By camping out on higher ground. |
A.life isn’t a bed of roses | B.east or west,home is best |
C.home is where the family is | D.a man’s house is his castle |
3 . Seventy-year-old Tububatu and his wife Taoshengchagan live in a village near Badain Jaran, Inner Mongolia. They’ve been spending every day since they retired in 2002 fighting against
The retired couple have been slowly growing their little desert forest at their own expense, so that they live a very
Although they’ve been
Apart from
It’s reported that so far they have planted over 70000 trees,
The couple have received several
A.pollution | B.poverty | C.sandstorm | D.hunger |
A.changed | B.finished | C.failed | D.disappeared |
A.growing | B.buying | C.borrowing | D.protecting |
A.profits | B.efforts | C.dreams | D.difficulties |
A.comfortable | B.quiet | C.balanced | D.simple |
A.equally | B.slowly | C.naturally | D.healthily |
A.cheered up | B.laughed at | C.picked up | D.taken in |
A.plans | B.hopes | C.chances | D.ways |
A.overcoming | B.improving | C.slowing | D.following |
A.current | B.ordinary | C.former | D.popular |
A.losing | B.spending | C.wasting | D.collecting |
A.special | B.strange | C.messy | D.terrible |
A.continue | B.desert | C.start | D.announce |
A.cards | B.letters | C.prizes | D.reviews |
A.models | B.roles | C.organizers | D.survivors |
Since Japan began releasing nuclear-contaminated (核污染) wastewater
“The Chinese government will take necessary measures to firmly protect the marine environment
5 . Raising livestock (牲畜) is a big part of the carbon emission from agriculture. But it is hard to change people’s habits and get them to give up their hamburgers, especially since more than one-third of Americans eat fast food every day. We previously called for carbon labels on everything from buildings to burgers. Now, a new study from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health found that labels on fast food affected people's choices.
The study said shifting current dietary patterns to more sustainable diets with less red meat could reduce food-related greenhouse gas emissions by 55% and have health benefits.
The 5,000 participants in the study were shown fake menus. One group got menus with high climate impact labels on red meat items and another had low climate impact labels on fish or plant-based burgers. Both menus were effective in reducing the orders for red meat. But interestingly, the high-impact labels were far more effective, with 23% of the participants choosing a more environmentally sustainable selection, while menus listing low-impact choices encouraged only 10% participants to change.
“We found that labeling red meat items with high-climate impact labels was more effective in increasing sustainable selections than labeling non-red meat items with low-climate impact labels,” wrote the authors of the study.
Lead author, Julia Wolfson, said, “These results suggest that menu labeling, particularly labels warning that an item has high climate impact, can be an effective strategy for encouraging more sustainable food choices in a fast food setting.”
The study points out negative labels might be unpopular: “It is unlikely that the industry would voluntarily adopt a negative label approach; such an approach needs to be carried out via law. However, high climate impact labels may easily be adopted in settings like universities and hospitals.”
They have a point that this label is aggressively negative, more like a cigarette warning than a food label. In the study, the authors note that future research should test more label designs using qualitative and quantitative research on how people understand different climate impact labels.
1. What is paragraph 1 mainly about?A.The impact of carbon emission. |
B.The background of the new study. |
C.The request of giving up carbon labels. |
D.The difficulty in changing people's habits. |
A.They liked them very much. |
B.They stuck to their preferences. |
C.Some of them stopped eating fast food. |
D.Some of them changed their food choices. |
A.It will be banned by law. |
B.It will face some resistance. |
C.It will produce bad results. |
D.It will be accepted by all industries. |
A.Raising livestock causes carbon emission |
B.Fast food has a negative effect on climate |
C.Researchers are focusing on climate impact |
D.Labels on fast food help protect the environment |
6 . The area in front of Janet and Jeffrey Crouch’s house in Columbia, Maryland, does not look usual for their neighbourhood. That is because the Crouches do not have a grass lawn(草坪). Instead, they have some small trees and many native plants.
In recent years, support for replacing lawns with native plants has been increasing in the US. It can be costly to keep a lawn looking good and green. But the Crouches had to spend much more money for the right not to have one.
People living in a house next to them complained to their homeowner’s association, or HOA. HOAs can make rules about the plants that homeowners in a neighbourhood are permitted to grow. Many HOAs require grass lawns. The HOA ordered the Crouches to pull out their native plants and put in grass. However, they refused. “We knew we were doing things that were beneficial for the environment, ” said Janet Crouch.
Lawns are called environmental dead zones in part because they provide no food or shelter for wildlife. They also do not support pollinators like birds, bees, and butterflies. Bee populations have been getting smaller in North America and may be getting smaller around the world.
There are other reasons that lawns are bad for the environment. They require a lot of water and chemicals. Large amounts of water can remove nutrients from the soil. After the water removes the nutrients, people buy even more chemicals to put on their lawns. Scientists say some of these chemicals might cause cancer and other health problems. There are over 16million hectares of grass lawns in the US. That means lawns use more water than any other irrigated(灌溉)crop in the country.
The Crouches’ battle against their HOA took three years. They say they spent $60, 000 fighting to keep their natural garden. They won. Because of their efforts, the state of Maryland passed a law that lets people grow native plants instead of grass, no matter what their HOA wants.
1. Which is one of HOA’s responsibilities?A.Developing and interpreting all relevant laws. |
B.Protecting the balance of nature in the community. |
C.Maintaining a unified greenery within the community. |
D.Dealing with all the requirements of residents. |
A.To attract people’s attention. |
B.To improve the neighbourhood relations. |
C.To save on the cost of lawn maintenance. |
D.To better improve the ecological environment. |
A.Lawns are suitable for bee reproduction. |
B.Local plants are environmentally friendly. |
C.Local plants can prevent soil and water pollution. |
D.Lawns are beneficial for soil and water conservation. |
A.Determined. | B.Humorous. | C.Brave. | D.Careful. |
7 . The world is being alerted to the possibility of a severe drought crisis caused by the recent heatwave that has affected much of Asia and the arrival of El Niño, which can cause intense drought for 2 − 3 years, Minister of Natural Resources and Environment Varawut Silpa-archa has warned.
Thailand is susceptible (易受影响的) to the effects of El Niño, which is forecast to start in June. The world is expected to face an intense drought due to the occurrence of El Niño, leading to reduced rainfall during the rainy season, or possibly no rain at all.
In addition to the ongoing drought, Thailand is also facing another unprecedented (前所未有的) phenomenon, the so-called “Monster Asian heatwave”. This extreme heatwave underlined growing global warming concerns and has made it even more important to recognise the need to reduce plastic wastes and industrial air pollutants. There is no quick fix, however. Because we have been worsening the environment for many decades, it will take many years of intensive efforts to tackle the global warming problem.
“Preparing to deal with the severe drought crisis for the next 2 − 3 years is urgent,” Varawut stressed. In the past, Bangkok has experienced flooding and a rising sea level due to the melting of the polar ice caps. If the situation worsens beyond the current level, the El Niño issue will become even more severe in the next 2 − 3 years.
Solutions to this problem include building more reservoirs (水库) and expanding the waterways to accommodate rainfall during this rainy season. Although this year’s dry season is a concern, there are still adequate water reserves in the dams. However, the situation is expected to worsen next year and in 2025. Therefore, sufficient water storage facilities and efficient farmland irrigation system are vital preparations.
“Whether the issue of climate change will lead to the collapse of our world, or not, is still up in the air. We may not have reached that stage yet but if we do not speed up efforts to tackle this issue seriously, we may face a loss of biodiversity,” Varawut said.
1. What are the two main factors of the possible drought crisis?A.Flooding and sea level rising. | B.Extreme heat and the El Niño. |
C.Melting polar ice caps and plastic waste. | D.Industrial air pollutants and global warming. |
A.Good result. | B.Big decision. | C.Easy solution. | D.Perfect excuse. |
A.By reducing plastic waste. |
B.By expanding more farmland. |
C.By increasing the amount of rainfall. |
D.By constructing enough water storage facilities. |
A.The collapse of the world is on the way. |
B.The loss of biodiversity is not a major concern. |
C.The effects of climate change are still uncertain. |
D.Efforts to address climate change need to be sped up. |
8 . It's just past 7 a.m.on a February morning in Maya Bay, several weeks after authorities reopened what is one of Thailand's most popular tourist attractions to the world for the first time since June 2018 following a massive restoration program.
In the hours to follow, a slow but steady flow of tourists becomes in great numbers as dozens of tourists make their way to the white﹣sand beach, phones at the ready as they take photos. Swimming is not allowed, though visitors can take a few steps in. It's disappointing, but a huge improvement over what visitors once experienced here.
Maya Bay is located in a Thailand's national park.The destination was made famous by the 2000 film The Beach,starring Leonardo DiCaprio.As the film's popularity grew,so did tourists' desire to visit the location where much of it was shot —Maya Bay.
"Around 40 years ago, Maya Bay was already a tourism destination, but mainly for Thai tourists because you didn't have speedboats at that time, " says Thon, a marine biologist and professor who requested authorities to close the bay four years ago. Over the years, the number of tourists rose from less than 1, 000 to as many as 7, 000 or 8, 000 visitors a day at its peak. On average, around 5, 000 people entered the bay each day.
In 2018, the Thai government closed the bay and began to restore the damaged ecosystem.
Since then, Thon and a team of fellow marine experts and volunteers have replanted over 30, 000 pieces of coral, much of it grown off the coast of a nearby island. Meanwhile, the wildlife also returned and has been growing. "Only three months after we closed the bay, the blacktip sharks came back and gave birth…so there are a lot of things happening in Maya Bay."
1. What do the first two paragraphs mainly tell us about Maya Bay?A.Its business hours. |
B.Its massive restoration |
C.Its huge improvement. |
D.Its reopening. |
A.Maya Bay. |
B.The 2000 film The Beach. |
C.Leonardo DiCaprio. |
D.A Thailand's national park. |
A.The benefit from tourism. |
B.The long history of Maya Bay. |
C.The rapid growth in tourists. |
D.The reason for the film's popularity. |
A.the protection efforts for Maya Bay was a little late. |
B.the protection efforts for Maya Bay has no support from the government. |
C.the protection efforts for Maya Bay remains to be seen whether it's useful. |
D.the protection efforts for Maya Bay has been effective. |
9 . Now, Earth Day is celebrated every year on April 22. A man, called Senator Gaylord Nelson Take, was determined to change the way we treated our planet. He didn’t stop his work until he had made a difference.
In 1963, Senator Gaylord Nelson wasn’t happy with the earth’s condition. He wanted to clean up the planet and solve pollution and environmental problems. As a senator, Gaylord Nelson was someone chosen by US citizens to help make laws, so he had a lot of power. He went to John F. Kennedy, the President at the time, with his concerns. The President agreed that the planet’s environment was a serious issue, so President Kennedy went around the country on a fiveday tour to promote (宣传) the idea of cleaning up the planet. People began making small changes, but it wasn’t enough.
A few years later, Senator Nelson decided to put one day aside every year for the cause of saving the planet. On April 22,1970, the first Earth Day was celebrated; 20 million American demonstrators (示威者) took part in Earth Day activities. Since then, Earth Day has become an international holiday. People all over the world are doing something to make the earth a cleaner, better place. Today more than 500 million people in 164 countries participate (参与) in Earth Day festivities!
Then, what can you do to make a difference?
*Encourage your family to recycle on a regular basis. It is a good way to help the earth!
*Switch to energyefficient light bulbs in your house to reduce the effects of global warming.
*Every glass bottle you recycle saves enough energy to run a TV for an hour and a half, while recycling an aluminum (铝) bottle can save enough energy to run your TV for three hours!
*Turn out the lights when you leave a room — unless someone’s still there!
*Use reuseable containers for your school lunches and snacks.
1. What does a senator usually do according to the passage?A.Cleaning up the planet. | B.Solving population problems. |
C.Helping make laws. | D.Talking to the President. |
A.in America | B.in Britain |
C.in 164 countries | D.across the world |
A.For a half hour. | B.For an hour. |
C.For an hour and a half. | D.For three hours. |
A.It was in 1963 that Senator Nelson came up with the idea of choosing a day as Earth Day. |
B.John F. Kennedy agreed to put April 22 aside every year as Earth Day. |
C.President Kennedy agreed with Nelson’s idea of cleaning up the planet. |
D.More than 500 million people took part in the first Earth Day activities. |
10 . In 1620, about half the USA was covered by forests. Today the forests have almost gone. A lot of good land has gone with them, leaving only sand. China doesn’t want to copy the USA’s example. We’re planting more and more trees. We’ve built the “ Great Green Wall” of trees across northern part of our country. The Great Green Wall is 7,000 kilometres long, and between 400 and 1,700 kilometres wide. It will stop the wind from blowing the earth away. It will stop the sand from moving towards the rich farmland in the south. More “Great Green Walls” are needed. Trees must be grown all over the world. Great Green Walls will make the world better.
1. In 1620, about ________ the USA was covered by forests.A.a third | B.half | C.two thirds | D.a fourth |
A.sand | B.water | C.wind | D.forests |
A.7,000 kilometers | B.1,700 kilometers |
C.7,000 meters | D.400 kilometers |
A.China | B.the USA |
C.some countries | D.every part of the world |
A.The Great Wall | B.Tall buildings |
C.Great Green Walls | D.Flowers and grass |