Thousands of years ago, Chinese characters appeared on animal bones and silk before they
Recently, a research team, drawing every little bit of
The team have shared the LLM on GitHub and other websites,
2 . A new study warns 1,500 endangered languages could no longer be spoken by the end of this century.
The study, led by The Australian National University (ANU), identified predictors that put endangered languages at high risk. Co-author Professor Lindell Bromham said that of the world’s 7, 000 recognized languages, around half were currently endangered. “We found that without immediate intervention, language loss could triple in the next 40 years. And by the end of this century,1,500 languages could cease (停止) to be spoken.”
Their study finds the widest range of factors ever putting endangered languages under pressure. One finding was that more years of schooling increased the level of language endangerment. The researchers say it shows we need to build curricula that support bilingual education, promoting both native language proficiency as well as use of regionally-dominant languages. “ Across the 51 factors or predictors we investigated, we also found some really unexpected and surprising pressure points. This included road density,“ Professor Bromham said. He added, “Contact with other local languages is not the problem. But we found that the more roads there are, connecting country to city, and villages to towns, the higher the risk of languages being endangered. It’s as if roads are helping dominant (主导的) languages ‘steam roll’ over other smaller languages.”
Professor Bromham said the study’s findings were a vital reminder that more action was urgently needed to preserve at-risk languages. He added, “When a language is lost, or is ‘sleeping’ as we say for languages that are no longer spoken, we lose so much of our human cultural diversity. Every the languages predicted to be lost this century still have fluent speakers, so there is still the chance to invest in supporting communities to bring native languages back to life and keep them strong for future generations.”
1. What do we know about language loss according to the study?A.It is hard to predict | B.It will lead to human death |
C.It is getting worse | D.It is out of our control |
A.Setting up bilingual courses. | B.Avoiding building more roads. |
C.Opening more local schools. | D.Contacting different languages. |
A.Some exact examples for the new research. | B.Detailed ways to help dominant languages. |
C.Different factors to brighten at-risk languages. | D.Elements to make endangered languages at risk. |
A.1,500 Endangered Languages at High Risk | B.A New Study Concerning Dominant Languages |
C.Reasons Putting Languages under Pressure | D.Some Good Ways to Save Endangered Languages |
In February 2022, I began learning Chinese with the
The one thing that truly makes me feel comfortable is making friends and engaging
During breaks from study, I frequently travels across China. I’ve explored cities like Shanghai, Chongqing, and Changsha in Hunan province, among others. Though I have experienced traveling on overnight trains for over 12 hours several times and explored
1.告知消息;
2.比赛安排。
注意:
1.词数100左右;
2.可以适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.推荐学习中文的方法(两种)。
2.推荐理由。
注意:
1.字数 100 词左右;
2.可适当增加细节,以使行文连贯。
Dear Mike,
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yours sincerely,
Li Hua
6 . In July 1915, severely tortured by his poor health, James Murray, one of the early editors of the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), defined one final word. After his 36 years’ dedication to the dictionary, his hard labour had taken a toll, knowing he would not see the project complete.
The poetic quality of Murray’s final days is one of the many memorable tales in The Dictionary People. Beginning in 1857, the OED was a huge crowdsourcing project - “the Wikipedia of the 19th century” - comprising 3, 000 people. The idea was to create a “descriptive” dictionary that tracked words’ use and meaning over time, unlike its “prescriptive”18th-century predecessor by Samuel Johnson, which told readers how to say and use words. Volunteers read widely, mailing in examples of how “rare, old-fashioned, new, strange” words were used. What is surprising about this fairly random method is that it worked.
The origin story of Sarah Ogilvie’s book is almost as improbable as that of the dictionary itself. Ms Ogilvie, a former scholar who served as an editor for the OED, went into the documents of Oxford University Press and came across an old notebook. It had belonged to Murray and contained the names and details of the dictionary volunteers, most of whom had previously been unknown. The Dictionary People is her work of detective scholarship, bringing the lives behind the names to readers.
Ms Ogilvie’s book is full of intriguing stories. The presentation of the book is unconventional, too, taking its structure from the work it describes. There are 26 alphabetical chapters, each celebrating a group of contributors ( memorably, “K” is for “kleptomaniac” people who desire to steal). This is a clever arrangement, though it sometimes means that broader issues emerge only in pieces.
Essentially, this is a story about ordinary people. It is concrete proof of those who, to cite dictionary-helper George Eliot, “lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs”.
1. What does the underlined expression “taken a toll” in paragraph 1 mean?A.Paid off. |
B.Proved in vain. |
C.Worn out the passion. |
D.Had a harmful effect. |
A.It serves as an example of dictionary editing. |
B.It provides precise directions for word usage. |
C.It is a cooperative work of many volunteers. |
D.It was edited with the help of Samuel Johnson. |
A.The story behind Sarah Ogilvie’s book. |
B.The detective methods of Sarah Ogilvie. |
C.Legends of the early OED editors. |
D.Murray’s role in editing the OED. |
A.A review of a book. |
B.A biography of an editor. |
C.An essay on dictionary editing. |
D.An introduction to a dictionary. |
Earlier this year, the Ugandan Ministry of Education introduced the Chinese language as a subject in secondary schools to some 60, 000 students and urged them
Besides having six Confucius Institutes, South Africa has rolled out Chinese language courses at 45 primary and secondary schools. More and more young people in this country are
Chinese Ambassador to South Africa Lin Songtian said that Beijing had provided technical and financial support to improve Chinese language teaching in the country. “Over the past 16 years, China and South Africa
Angie Motshekga, South Africa’s minister for basic education, said that teaching the Chinese language has been at the heart of education and cultural exchanges between Pretoria and Beijing
8 . While many of us may have been away somewhere nice last summer, few would say that we’ve “summered.” “Summer” is clearly a noun, more precisely, a verbed noun.
Way back in our childhood, we all learned the difference between a noun and a verb. With such a tidy definition, it was easy to spot the difference. Not so in adulthood, where we are expected to “foot” bills, “chair” committees, and “dialogue” with political opponents. Chances are that you didn’t feel uncomfortable about the sight of those verbed nouns.
“The verbing of nouns is as old as the English language,” says Patricia O’Conner, a former editor at The New York Times Book Review. Experts estimate that 20 percent of all English verbs were originally nouns. And the phenomenon seems to be snowballing. Since 1900, about 40 percent of all new verbs have come from nouns.
Even though conversion (转化) is quite universal, plenty of grammarians object to the practice. Some most leading experts, William Strunk Jr. and E. B. White, in The Elements of Style—the Bible for the use of American English—have this to say: “Many nouns lately have been pressed into service as verbs. Not all are bad, but all are questionable.” The Chicago Manual of Style takes a similar standpoint, advising writers to use verbs with great care.
“Sometimes people object to a new verb because they resist what is unfamiliar to them,” says O’Conner. That’s why we’re comfortable “hosting” a party, but we might feel upset by the thought of “medaling” in sports. So are there any rules for verbing? Benjamin Dreyer, copy chief at Random House, doesn’t offer a rule, but suggests that people think twice about “verbifying” a noun if it’s easily replaceable by an already existing popular verb. Make sure it’s descriptive but not silly-sounding, he says.
In the end, however, style is subjective. Easy conversion of nouns to verbs has been part of English grammar for centuries; it is one of the processes that make English “English”. Not every coined word passes into general use, but as for trying to end verbing altogether, forget it.
1. What can we learn about the verbing of nouns?A.It hasn’t recently been opposed by many grammarians. |
B.It is more commonly accepted by children than adults. |
C.It hasn’t been a rare phenomenon in the past century. |
D.It can be easily replaced by existing verbs in practice. |
A.Cautious | B.Objective. |
C.Optimistic. | D.Unconcerned. |
A.Predictable. | B.Practicable. |
C.Approaching. | D.Impossible. |
A.Are 40 Percent of all new verbs from nouns? |
B.Are Summering and Medaling Annoying? |
C.Are You Comfortable about a New Verb? |
D.Are There Any Rules for Verbing? |
9 . For adults, communicating in our first language feels easy and natural. Yet learning language is a complex process that is influenced by several factors. When young children are beginning to learn language, some influences, such as the amount of speech a child hears and the amount of time they spend in back-and-forth language interactions with others, have what may appear to be obvious connections to language learning. Perhaps less obvious is that children’s own physical experiences with their environment help them learn new words.
In new research in the cognitive sciences, we investigated how this is the case by considering how children learn words that refer to something they can touch, grasp and interact with. We asked parents to rate how easily a child can physically interact with the object, idea or experiences that a word refers to. We found words that refer to objects that are easy for children to interact with are also words that are learned at an earlier age.
For instance, a word such as spoon is usually learned earlier than a word such as sky. And this relationship remains even when we consider other things that can affect word learning, such as how common a word is in everyday language. Words such as spoon and sky are both relevant to everyday life, and so children will probably hear those words quite early in their development. One difference between them is that spoon refers to something they can touch, grasp and interact with, whereas sky does not.
Our findings agree with those of studies where babies wore small head-mounted body cameras to record their interactions with objects. Those studies show that the children’s own physical experiences helps them learn new words. For instance, in one study researchers found that 18-month-old babies were more likely to learn the name of a new object when they held that object, and less likely to learn the name if their parent held the new object. Another study found that 15-month-olds who spent more time using new objects had learned more nouns by the time they were 21 months old.
1. What is the aim of the new research?A.To see if babies’ physical experiences help them learn new words. |
B.To investigate how a baby learns names of everyday objects. |
C.To find out what influences a baby’s language learning. |
D.To study how a baby interacts with everyday objects. |
A.Bag. | B.Heart. | C.Milk. | D.Leaf. |
A.To further support their finding. | B.To summarize the research result. |
C.To point out new research directions. | D.To introduce results of other findings. |
A.The author is a parent. | B.The author is a researcher. |
C.The author is a professor. | D.The author is a journalist. |
As an educator, I know what is going on in the minds of my students. I look at
When students are interested in a lesson, they lean forward and look at me. People have a tendency
Some students are amused by something else. They spend all their time